> On 14 Sep 2016, at 23:07, Gregory Farnum wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 7:19 AM, Dan Van Der Ster
> wrote:
>> Indeed, seems to be trimmed by osd_target_transaction_size (default 30) per
>> new osdmap.
>> Thanks a lot for your help!
>
> IIRC we had an entire separate issue before adding
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 7:19 AM, Dan Van Der Ster
wrote:
> Indeed, seems to be trimmed by osd_target_transaction_size (default 30) per
> new osdmap.
> Thanks a lot for your help!
IIRC we had an entire separate issue before adding that field, where
cleaning up from bad situations like that would
.871.2799 |
> > If you are not the intended recipient of this message or received it
> > erroneously, please notify the sender and delete it, together with any
> > attachments, and be advised that any dissemination or copying of this
> > message is prohibited.
> > ______________
ted.
>
> From: ceph-users [ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] on behalf of Dan Van Der
> Ster [daniel.vanders...@cern.ch]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 3:45 AM
> To: ceph-us...@ceph.com
> Subject: [ceph-users] Cleanup old osdmaps
]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 3:45 AM
> To: ceph-us...@ceph.com
> Subject: [ceph-users] Cleanup old osdmaps after #13990 fix applied
>
> Hi,
>
> We've just upgraded to 0.94.9, so I believe this issue is fixed:
>
>http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13990
&g
___
From: ceph-users [ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] on behalf of Dan Van Der
Ster [daniel.vanders...@cern.ch]
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 3:45 AM
To: ceph-us...@ceph.com
Subject: [ceph-users] Cleanup old osdmaps after #13990 fix applied
Hi,
We've just upgraded to 0.9
Hi,
We've just upgraded to 0.94.9, so I believe this issue is fixed:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13990
AFAICT "resolved" means the number of osdmaps saved on each OSD will not grow
unboundedly anymore.
However, we have many OSDs with loads of old osdmaps, e.g.:
# pwd
/var/lib/ceph/osd
