Re: [ceph-users] Crush Rules with multiple Device Classes

2018-07-19 Thread Oliver Freyermuth
om:* ceph-users on behalf of Oliver > Freyermuth > *Sent:* Thursday, 19 July 2018 6:13:25 AM > *To:* ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > *Cc:* Peter Wienemann > *Subject:* [ceph-users] Crush Rules with multiple Device Classes >   > Dear Cephalopodians, > > we use an SSD-only pool

Re: [ceph-users] Crush Rules with multiple Device Classes

2018-07-19 Thread Oliver Freyermuth
Am 19.07.2018 um 05:57 schrieb Konstantin Shalygin: >> Now my first question is: >> 1) Is there a way to specify "take default class (ssd or nvme)"? >>Then we could just do this for the migration period, and at some point >> remove "ssd". >> >> If multi-device-class in a crush rule is not s

Re: [ceph-users] Crush Rules with multiple Device Classes

2018-07-18 Thread Linh Vu
behalf of Oliver Freyermuth Sent: Thursday, 19 July 2018 6:13:25 AM To: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com Cc: Peter Wienemann Subject: [ceph-users] Crush Rules with multiple Device Classes Dear Cephalopodians, we use an SSD-only pool to store the metadata of our CephFS. In the future, we will add a few

Re: [ceph-users] Crush Rules with multiple Device Classes

2018-07-18 Thread Konstantin Shalygin
Now my first question is: 1) Is there a way to specify "take default class (ssd or nvme)"? Then we could just do this for the migration period, and at some point remove "ssd". If multi-device-class in a crush rule is not supported yet, the only workaround which comes to my mind right now is

[ceph-users] Crush Rules with multiple Device Classes

2018-07-18 Thread Oliver Freyermuth
Dear Cephalopodians, we use an SSD-only pool to store the metadata of our CephFS. In the future, we will add a few NVMEs, and in the long-term view, replace the existing SSDs by NVMEs, too. Thinking this through, I came up with three questions which I do not find answered in the docs (yet).