Hello everyone,
In my rather heterogeneous setup ...
-1 54.36 root default
-2 42.44 room 2.162
-4 6.09host le09091
3 2.03osd.3 up 1
1 2.03osd.1 up 1
9 2.03
Hello,
On Tue, 24 Feb 2015 06:28:25 + frank.zirkelb...@lew-verteilnetz.de
wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> In my rather heterogeneous setup ...
>
> -1 54.36 root default
> -2 42.44 room 2.162
> -4 6.09host le09091
> 3 2.03
Hello Christian,
hello everyone,
> That would be my guess, as a similar 4 node cluster here with a flat, host
> only topology is having its data distributed as expected by the weights.
To verify this, I eliminated the room buckets.
Now all hosts are located within the root bucket.
(Same tree as t
Hello everyone,
I think I figured out the reason, why in my setup
the three small hosts are almost nearly full
while there is plenty of free space on the only big one.
(ceph osd tree output below)
It's simply hitting the limit. The algorithm selects 3 hosts.
Even if one copy was always on the bi
