Hi Pieter,
At the time our cluster environment was Ubuntu 10.04 + Kernel-2.6.32 +
ocfs2-tools-1.4.3.
Later we did the upgrade to Ubuntu 10.10 + Kernel-2.6.35 +
ocfs2-tools-1.6.4.
We tried to use OCFS2 under production in 2010, but were forced to
migrate to a failover design cluster with Ex
5
Objet: [ceph-users] Designing a cluster with ceph and benchmark (ceph vs ext4)
Hi !
I have failover clusters for some aplications. Generally with 2 members
configured with Ubuntu + Drbd + Ext4. For example, my IMAP cluster works
fine with ~ 50k email accounts and my HTTP cluster hosts ~2k sit
stall/get-packages/#getting-packages
- Mail original -
De: "Listas@Adminlinux"
À: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
Envoyé: Vendredi 23 Mai 2014 20:31:35
Objet: [ceph-users] Designing a cluster with ceph and benchmark (ceph vs ext4)
Hi !
I have failover clusters for some apli
Hi !
I have failover clusters for some aplications. Generally with 2 members
configured with Ubuntu + Drbd + Ext4. For example, my IMAP cluster works
fine with ~ 50k email accounts and my HTTP cluster hosts ~2k sites.
See design here: http://adminlinux.com.br/cluster_design.txt
I would like
Am 26.05.2014 15:52, schrieb Listas@Adminlinux:
> Thanks Pieter!
>
> I tried using OCFS2 over DRBD, but was not satisfied. I was being affected by
> various bugs in OCFS2. But Oracle was not committed to solving them.
>
When did you try it? We use such a setup with ocfs2 ontop of rbd with 3.10.4
Thanks Pieter!
I tried using OCFS2 over DRBD, but was not satisfied. I was being
affected by various bugs in OCFS2. But Oracle was not committed to
solving them.
--
Thiago Henrique
Em 24-05-2014 09:14, Pieter Koorts escreveu:
If looking for a DRBD alternative and not wanting to use CephFS i
Thanks Cristian. I will reflect on what you told me. There is no free
lunch, I'll think it's worth paying the price.
--
Thiago Henrique
Em 24-05-2014 02:43, Christian Balzer escreveu:
Hello,
On Fri, 23 May 2014 15:41:23 -0300 Listas@Adminlinux wrote:
Hi !
I have failover clusters for some
On Sat, 24 May 2014 13:14:42 +0100 Pieter Koorts wrote:
> If looking for a DRBD alternative and not wanting to use CephFS is it
> not possible to just use something like OCFS2 or GFS on top of a RDB
> block device and all worker nodes accessing it via GFS or OCFS2
> (obviously with write-through m
What come first in my mind is GlusterFS, just my 2 cents.
Cheers
Le 23/05/2014 20:41, Listas@Adminlinux a écrit :
> Hi !
>
> I have failover clusters for some aplications. Generally with 2
> members configured with Ubuntu + Drbd + Ext4. For example, my IMAP
> cluster works fine with ~ 50k email a
If looking for a DRBD alternative and not wanting to use CephFS is it not
possible to just use something like OCFS2 or GFS on top of a RDB block device
and all worker nodes accessing it via GFS or OCFS2 (obviously with
write-through mode)?
Would this method not present some advantages over DRBD
Hello,
On Fri, 23 May 2014 15:41:23 -0300 Listas@Adminlinux wrote:
> Hi !
>
> I have failover clusters for some aplications. Generally with 2 members
> configured with Ubuntu + Drbd + Ext4. For example, my IMAP cluster works
> fine with ~ 50k email accounts and my HTTP cluster hosts ~2k sites
Hi !
I have failover clusters for some aplications. Generally with 2 members
configured with Ubuntu + Drbd + Ext4. For example, my IMAP cluster works
fine with ~ 50k email accounts and my HTTP cluster hosts ~2k sites.
See design here: http://adminlinux.com.br/cluster_design.txt
I would like
12 matches
Mail list logo
