Hello,
Yes 1) and 2) is correct, server provider does their only internal checking
before they allow a particular disk model to be used.
The two disk models are :
TOSHIBA MG06ACA10TEY
ST1NM0156-2AA111
They are just using the onboard motherboard SATA3 port's, again only
difference between eac
Hi Ashley,
Always interesting to see hardware benchmarks :)
Do I understand the following correctly?
1) your host (server provider) rates the Toshiba drives as faster
2) Ceph osd perf rates the Seagate drives as faster
Could you share the benchmark output and drive model numbers?
Presumably th
On 13/12/2018 09:53, Ashley Merrick wrote:
I have a Mimic Bluestore EC RBD Pool running on 8+2, this is currently
running across 4 node's.
3 Node's are running Toshiba disk's while one node is running Segate
disks (same size, spinning speed, enterprise disks e.t.c), I have
noticed huge diffe
Hello,
Thanks for your reply!, while the performance within CEPH is different the
two disk's are exactly the same in rated performance / type e.t.c just from
two different manufacturers. Obviously id expected such a big difference
between 5200 and 7200RPM or SMR and CMR for example but these are i
I have a Mimic Bluestore EC RBD Pool running on 8+2, this is currently
running across 4 node's.
3 Node's are running Toshiba disk's while one node is running Segate disks
(same size, spinning speed, enterprise disks e.t.c), I have noticed huge
difference in IOWAIT and disk latency performance betw
