Re: [ceph-users] Fwd: HEALTH_WARN pool vol has too few pgs

Hi - As per the OSD calculations: no of OSD * 100/pool size => 96 *100/3 = 3200 => 4096 So 4096 is correct pg_num. this case - PG are correct number as per the recommended. On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 2:14 AM, Ferhat Ozkasgarli wrote: > As message satates, you must increase

Re: [ceph-users] Fwd: HEALTH_WARN pool vol has too few pgs

As message satates, you must increase placement group number for the pool. Because 108T data require larger pg mumber. On Feb 3, 2016 8:09 PM, "M Ranga Swami Reddy" wrote: > Hi, > > I am using ceph for my storage cluster and health shows as WARN state > with too few pgs. >

Re: [ceph-users] Fwd: HEALTH_WARN pool vol has too few pgs

Fwd: HEALTH_WARN pool vol has too few pgs Current pg_num: 4096. As per the PG num formula, no OSD * 100/pool size -> 184 * 100/3 = 6133, so I can increase to 8192. Is this solves the problem? Thanks Swami On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 2:14 AM, Ferhat Ozkasgarli <ozkasga...@gmail.com> wrote: > As

Re: [ceph-users] Fwd: HEALTH_WARN pool vol has too few pgs

Regards > Somnath > -Original Message- > From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf Of M > Ranga Swami Reddy > Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2016 9:48 PM > To: Ferhat Ozkasgarli > Cc: ceph-users > Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Fwd: HEALTH_WARN

Re: [ceph-users] Fwd: HEALTH_WARN pool vol has too few pgs

Current pg_num: 4096. As per the PG num formula, no OSD * 100/pool size -> 184 * 100/3 = 6133, so I can increase to 8192. Is this solves the problem? Thanks Swami On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 2:14 AM, Ferhat Ozkasgarli wrote: > As message satates, you must increase placement

[ceph-users] Fwd: HEALTH_WARN pool vol has too few pgs

Hi, I am using ceph for my storage cluster and health shows as WARN state with too few pgs. == health HEALTH_WARN pool volumes has too few pgs == The volume pool has 4096 pgs -- ceph osd pool get volumes pg_num pg_num: 4096 --- and >ceph df NAME ID USED %USED