Hi - As per the OSD calculations: no of OSD * 100/pool size => 96
*100/3 = 3200 => 4096
So 4096 is correct pg_num.
this case - PG are correct number as per the recommended.
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 2:14 AM, Ferhat Ozkasgarli wrote:
> As message satates, you must increase placement group number for
Original Message-
> From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf Of M
> Ranga Swami Reddy
> Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2016 9:48 PM
> To: Ferhat Ozkasgarli
> Cc: ceph-users
> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Fwd: HEALTH_WARN pool vol has too few pgs
>
>
Fwd: HEALTH_WARN pool vol has too few pgs
Current pg_num: 4096. As per the PG num formula, no OSD * 100/pool size ->
184 * 100/3 = 6133, so I can increase to 8192. Is this solves the problem?
Thanks
Swami
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 2:14 AM, Ferhat Ozkasgarli wrote:
> As message satates, you mus
Current pg_num: 4096. As per the PG num formula, no OSD * 100/pool size ->
184 * 100/3 = 6133, so I can increase to 8192. Is this solves the problem?
Thanks
Swami
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 2:14 AM, Ferhat Ozkasgarli wrote:
> As message satates, you must increase placement group number for the pool
As message satates, you must increase placement group number for the pool.
Because 108T data require larger pg mumber.
On Feb 3, 2016 8:09 PM, "M Ranga Swami Reddy" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using ceph for my storage cluster and health shows as WARN state
> with too few pgs.
>
> ==
> health HEALTH_WA
Hi,
I am using ceph for my storage cluster and health shows as WARN state
with too few pgs.
==
health HEALTH_WARN pool volumes has too few pgs
==
The volume pool has 4096 pgs
--
ceph osd pool get volumes pg_num
pg_num: 4096
---
and
>ceph df
NAME ID USED %USED
