Re: [ceph-users] Fwd: Re: Ubuntu xenial and ceph jewel systemd

2016-04-13 Thread James Page
Patched up version is now in Xenial - Alfredo is looking to produce a new release soon... On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 at 13:00 hp cre wrote: > fyi, i tested ceph-deploy master branch and it worked fine. > > On 13 April 2016 at 11:28, hp cre wrote: > >> Great! Please let me know when the patched version

Re: [ceph-users] Fwd: Re: Ubuntu xenial and ceph jewel systemd

2016-04-13 Thread hp cre
fyi, i tested ceph-deploy master branch and it worked fine. On 13 April 2016 at 11:28, hp cre wrote: > Great! Please let me know when the patched version is up. > > Thanks for your help, much appreciated. > > On 13 April 2016 at 11:19, James Page wrote: > >> n Wed, 13 Apr 2016 at 10:09 hp cre

Re: [ceph-users] Fwd: Re: Ubuntu xenial and ceph jewel systemd

2016-04-13 Thread hp cre
Great! Please let me know when the patched version is up. Thanks for your help, much appreciated. On 13 April 2016 at 11:19, James Page wrote: > n Wed, 13 Apr 2016 at 10:09 hp cre wrote: > >> I am using version .31 from either the ceph repo or the one you updated >> in the ubuntu repo. >> It s

Re: [ceph-users] Fwd: Re: Ubuntu xenial and ceph jewel systemd

2016-04-13 Thread James Page
n Wed, 13 Apr 2016 at 10:09 hp cre wrote: > I am using version .31 from either the ceph repo or the one you updated in > the ubuntu repo. > It seems that these commits were not "commited" in version .31 ? > Yes - they post-date the .31 release; a patched version of .31 should be in Xenial shortl

Re: [ceph-users] Fwd: Re: Ubuntu xenial and ceph jewel systemd

2016-04-13 Thread hp cre
I am using version .31 from either the ceph repo or the one you updated in the ubuntu repo. It seems that these commits were not "commited" in version .31 ? On 13 April 2016 at 10:58, James Page wrote: > OK - so my test was with the master branch of ceph-deploy which does work > correctly - spec

Re: [ceph-users] Fwd: Re: Ubuntu xenial and ceph jewel systemd

2016-04-13 Thread James Page
OK - so my test was with the master branch of ceph-deploy which does work correctly - specifically: https://github.com/ceph/ceph-deploy/commit/b796a45b119afb9186301a868c25a9ba70642891 https://github.com/ceph/ceph-deploy/commit/374088665e43654e97512ab40f2cc141e238f21c are post .31 so only the basi

Re: [ceph-users] Fwd: Re: Ubuntu xenial and ceph jewel systemd

2016-04-13 Thread hp cre
To answer Oliver's question, a standard ubuntu server install is just an iso of the server being installed in an automated mode. no software specific options are made except in tasksel, i choose openssh server only. On 13 April 2016 at 10:49, hp cre wrote: > I'll give it one more try. > > I trie

Re: [ceph-users] Fwd: Re: Ubuntu xenial and ceph jewel systemd

2016-04-13 Thread hp cre
I'll give it one more try. I tried to inspect and follow the code for ceph-deploy, though i'm no python developer. It seems that in hosts/debian/__init__.py, line number 20, that if distro.lower == ubuntu then it will return upstart. maybe thats the problem ? On 13 April 2016 at 10:19, James Pag

Re: [ceph-users] Fwd: Re: Ubuntu xenial and ceph jewel systemd

2016-04-13 Thread Oliver Dzombic
Hi, maybe you should clearify what is "standard" install for both of you. Is it minimal ? Or some other selectable compilation ? Did you install via Netinstall or via DVD ? -- Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Best regards Oliver Dzombic IP-Interactive mailto:i...@ip-interactive.de Anschrift: IP

Re: [ceph-users] Fwd: Re: Ubuntu xenial and ceph jewel systemd

2016-04-13 Thread James Page
Hello On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 at 22:08 hp cre wrote: > Hey James, > Did you check my steps? What did you do differently and worked for your? > Your steps look OK to me; I did pretty much the same, but with three nodes instead on a single node - but I'm scratching my head as to why I don't see the s

Re: [ceph-users] Fwd: Re: Ubuntu xenial and ceph jewel systemd

2016-04-11 Thread hp cre
Hey James, Did you check my steps? What did you do differently and worked for your? Thanks for sharing.. On 11 Apr 2016 22:39, "James Page" wrote: > On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 at 21:35 hp cre wrote: > >> I wanted to try the latest ceph-deploy. Thats why i downloaded this >> version (31). Latest ubuntu

Re: [ceph-users] Fwd: Re: Ubuntu xenial and ceph jewel systemd

2016-04-11 Thread James Page
On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 at 21:35 hp cre wrote: > I wanted to try the latest ceph-deploy. Thats why i downloaded this > version (31). Latest ubuntu version is (20). > > I tried today at the end of the failed attempt to uninstall this version > and install the one that came with xenial, but whatever i

Re: [ceph-users] Fwd: Re: Ubuntu xenial and ceph jewel systemd

2016-04-11 Thread hp cre
I wanted to try the latest ceph-deploy. Thats why i downloaded this version (31). Latest ubuntu version is (20). I tried today at the end of the failed attempt to uninstall this version and install the one that came with xenial, but whatever i did, it always defaulted to version 31. Maybe someone

Re: [ceph-users] Fwd: Re: Ubuntu xenial and ceph jewel systemd

2016-04-11 Thread Peter Sabaini
On 2016-04-11 18:15, hp cre wrote: > -- Forwarded message -- > From: "hp cre" mailto:hpc...@gmail.com>> > Date: 11 Apr 2016 15:50 > Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Ubuntu xenial and ceph jewel systemd > To: "James Page" mailto:james.p...@ubuntu.com>> > Cc: > > Here is exactly what has be

[ceph-users] Fwd: Re: Ubuntu xenial and ceph jewel systemd

2016-04-11 Thread hp cre
-- Forwarded message -- From: "hp cre" Date: 11 Apr 2016 15:50 Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Ubuntu xenial and ceph jewel systemd To: "James Page" Cc: Here is exactly what has been done (just started from scratch today): 1- install default xenial beta 2 2- run apt-get update && apt