Yes, this is common practice.
Daniel
On 12/22/2016 02:34 PM, Gerald Spencer wrote:
Wonderful, just as I expected. Do folks normally have several RGW
running on individual machines with a load balancer at larger scales?
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 8:22 AM, LOPEZ Jean-Charles mailto:jelo...@redhat.c
Wonderful, just as I expected. Do folks normally have several RGW running
on individual machines with a load balancer at larger scales?
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 8:22 AM, LOPEZ Jean-Charles
wrote:
> Hi Gerald,
>
> for the s3 and swift case, the clients are not accessing the ceph cluster.
> They ar
Hi Gerald,
for the s3 and swift case, the clients are not accessing the ceph cluster. They
are s3 and swift clients and only discuss with the RGW over HTTP. The RGW is
the ceph client that does all the interaction with the ceph cluster.
Best
JC
> On Dec 21, 2016, at 07:27, Gerald Spencer wrot
I was under the impression that when a client talks to the cluster, it
grabs the osd map and computes the crush algorithm to determine where it
stores the object. Does the rgw server do this for clients? If I had 12
clients all talking through one gateway, would that server have to pass all
of the
> Op 20 december 2016 om 3:24 schreef Gerald Spencer :
>
>
> Hello all,
>
> We're currently waiting on a delivery of equipment for a small 50TB proof
> of concept cluster, and I've been lurking/learning a ton from you. Thanks
> for how active everyone is.
>
> Question(s):
> How does the raids
Hello all,
We're currently waiting on a delivery of equipment for a small 50TB proof
of concept cluster, and I've been lurking/learning a ton from you. Thanks
for how active everyone is.
Question(s):
How does the raids gateway work exactly?
Does it introduce a single point of failure?
Does all of
