> -Original Message-
> From: ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:ceph-devel-
> ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Somnath Roy
> Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 8:46 AM
>
> Thanks Haomai..
> Since Async messenger is always using a constant number of threads , there
> could be a potent
itial performance cluster SimpleMessenger vs
AsyncMessenger results
Hi Haomai,
Great! I haven't had a chance to dig in and look at it with valgrind yet, but
if I
get a chance after I'm done with newstore fragment testing and somnath's
writepath work I'll try to go back and di
?
-Xiaoxi
> -Original Message-
> From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf Of
> Mark Nelson
> Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 9:03 PM
> To: Haomai Wang
> Cc: ceph-devel; ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Initial performance clust
On 10/12/2015 11:12 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Mark Nelson wrote:
Hi Guy,
Given all of the recent data on how different memory allocator
configurations improve SimpleMessenger performance (and the effect of memory
allocators and transparent hugepages on RSS memo
Hi Haomai,
Great! I haven't had a chance to dig in and look at it with valgrind
yet, but if I get a chance after I'm done with newstore fragment testing
and somnath's writepath work I'll try to go back and dig in if you
haven't had a chance yet.
Mark
On 10/12/2015 09:56 PM, Haomai Wang wro
On Tue, 13 Oct 2015, Haomai Wang wrote:
> resend
>
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Haomai Wang wrote:
> > COOL
> >
> > Interesting that async messenger will consume more memory than simple, in my
> > mind I always think async should use less memory. I will give a look at this
Yeah.. I was su
gt;
> Regards
> Somnath
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Haomai Wang [mailto:haomaiw...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 11:35 PM
> To: Somnath Roy
> Cc: Mark Nelson; ceph-devel; ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Initial performance cluste
aomai Wang [mailto:haomaiw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 11:35 PM
To: Somnath Roy
Cc: Mark Nelson; ceph-devel; ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Initial performance cluster SimpleMessenger vs
AsyncMessenger results
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Somnath Roy
.ceph.com] On Behalf Of
> Haomai Wang
> Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 7:57 PM
> To: Mark Nelson
> Cc: ceph-devel; ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Initial performance cluster SimpleMessenger vs
> AsyncMessenger results
>
>
>
> COOL
>
>
&g
sers] Initial performance cluster SimpleMessenger vs
AsyncMessenger results
COOL
Interesting that async messenger will consume more memory than simple, in my
mind I always think async should use less memory. I will give a look at this
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 12:50 AM, Mark Nelson
mailto:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Mark Nelson wrote:
> Hi Guy,
>
> Given all of the recent data on how different memory allocator
> configurations improve SimpleMessenger performance (and the effect of memory
> allocators and transparent hugepages on RSS memory usage), I thought I'd run
> some test
resend
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Haomai Wang wrote:
> COOL
>
> Interesting that async messenger will consume more memory than simple, in my
> mind I always think async should use less memory. I will give a look at this
>
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 12:50 AM, Mark Nelson wrote:
>>
>> Hi Guy
COOL
Interesting that async messenger will consume more memory than simple, in
my mind I always think async should use less memory. I will give a look at
this
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 12:50 AM, Mark Nelson wrote:
> Hi Guy,
>
> Given all of the recent data on how different memory allocator
> conf
Hi Guy,
Given all of the recent data on how different memory allocator
configurations improve SimpleMessenger performance (and the effect of
memory allocators and transparent hugepages on RSS memory usage), I
thought I'd run some tests looking how AsyncMessenger does in
comparison. We spoke
14 matches
Mail list logo
