...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf Of Mykola
Dvornik
Sent: Friday, 15 July 2016 6:54 PM
To: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Lessons learned upgrading Hammer -> Jewel
I would also advice people to mind the SELinux if it is enabled on the OSD's
nodes.
The re-labeling should be done as the
> Op 16 juli 2016 om 9:06 schreef Zoltan Arnold Nagy
> :
>
>
> I’ve also upgraded last weekend our Hammer cluster to Jewel except for RGW.
> Reading the initial user stories on the list where you had to run some
> special script to create the default built-in zone discouraged me from doing
>
I’ve also upgraded last weekend our Hammer cluster to Jewel except for RGW.
Reading the initial user stories on the list where you had to run some special
script to create the default built-in zone discouraged me from doing so.
So on .2, the rgw upgrade went without any hitch just by upgrading r
> Op 15 juli 2016 om 10:48 schreef Mart van Santen :
>
>
>
> Hi Wido,
>
> Thank you, we are currently in the same process so this information is
> very usefull. Can you share why you upgraded from hammer directly to
> jewel, is there a reason to skip infernalis? So, I wonder why you didn't
> d
Hello,
On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 10:48:40 +0200 Mart van Santen wrote:
>
> Hi Wido,
>
> Thank you, we are currently in the same process so this information is
> very usefull. Can you share why you upgraded from hammer directly to
> jewel, is there a reason to skip infernalis? So, I wonder why you did
users] Lessons learned upgrading Hammer -> Jewel
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 10:48:40 +0200
Hi Wido,
Thank you, we are currently in the same process so this information
is very usefull. Can you share why you upgraded from hammer
directly
to jewel, is there a reason
Hi Matt,
I have too followed the upgrade from hammer to jewel, I think it is pretty
accepted to upgrade between LTS releases (H>J) skipping the 'stable'
releases (I) in the middle.
Thanks
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 9:48 AM, Mart van Santen wrote:
>
> Hi Wido,
>
> Thank you, we are currently in th
Hi Wido,
Thank you, we are currently in the same process so this information is
very usefull. Can you share why you upgraded from hammer directly to
jewel, is there a reason to skip infernalis? So, I wonder why you didn't
do a hammer->infernalis->jewel upgrade, as that seems the logical path
for
good job, thank you for sharing, Wido~
it's very useful~
2016-07-14 14:33 GMT+08:00 Wido den Hollander :
> To add, the RGWs upgraded just fine as well.
>
> No regions in use here (yet!), so that upgraded as it should.
>
> Wido
>
> > Op 13 juli 2016 om 16:56 schreef Wido den Hollander :
> >
> >
>
To add, the RGWs upgraded just fine as well.
No regions in use here (yet!), so that upgraded as it should.
Wido
> Op 13 juli 2016 om 16:56 schreef Wido den Hollander :
>
>
> Hello,
>
> The last 3 days I worked at a customer with a 1800 OSD cluster which had to
> be upgraded from Hammer 0.94.
Thanks for sharing Wido.
>From your information you only talk about MON and OSD. What about the
RGW nodes? You stated in the beginning that 99% is rgw...
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The last 3 days I worked at a customer with a 1800 OSD cluster which h
Hello,
The last 3 days I worked at a customer with a 1800 OSD cluster which had to be
upgraded from Hammer 0.94.5 to Jewel 10.2.2
The cluster in this case is 99% RGW, but also some RBD.
I wanted to share some of the things we encountered during this upgrade.
All 180 nodes are running CentOS 7.
12 matches
Mail list logo
