Re: [ceph-users] Placement Groups undersized after adding OSDs

2018-11-15 Thread Wido den Hollander
On 11/15/18 4:37 AM, Gregory Farnum wrote: > This is weird. Can you capture the pg query for one of them and narrow > down in which epoch it “lost” the previous replica and see if there’s > any evidence of why? So I checked it further and dug deeper into the logs and found this on osd.1982: 201

Re: [ceph-users] Placement Groups undersized after adding OSDs

2018-11-14 Thread Gregory Farnum
This is weird. Can you capture the pg query for one of them and narrow down in which epoch it “lost” the previous replica and see if there’s any evidence of why? On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 8:09 PM Wido den Hollander wrote: > Hi, > > I'm in the middle of expanding a Ceph cluster and while having 'cep

[ceph-users] Placement Groups undersized after adding OSDs

2018-11-14 Thread Wido den Hollander
Hi, I'm in the middle of expanding a Ceph cluster and while having 'ceph -s' open I suddenly saw a bunch of Placement Groups go undersized. My first hint was that one or more OSDs have failed, but none did. So I checked and I saw these Placement Groups undersized: 11.3b54 active+undersized+degr