On 11/15/18 4:37 AM, Gregory Farnum wrote:
> This is weird. Can you capture the pg query for one of them and narrow
> down in which epoch it “lost” the previous replica and see if there’s
> any evidence of why?
So I checked it further and dug deeper into the logs and found this on
osd.1982:
201
This is weird. Can you capture the pg query for one of them and narrow down
in which epoch it “lost” the previous replica and see if there’s any
evidence of why?
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 8:09 PM Wido den Hollander wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm in the middle of expanding a Ceph cluster and while having 'cep
Hi,
I'm in the middle of expanding a Ceph cluster and while having 'ceph -s'
open I suddenly saw a bunch of Placement Groups go undersized.
My first hint was that one or more OSDs have failed, but none did.
So I checked and I saw these Placement Groups undersized:
11.3b54 active+undersized+degr