Re: [ceph-users] Question: CephFS + Bluestore

That's right. I didn't actually use Jewel for very long. I'm glad it worked for you. On Fri, May 11, 2018, 4:49 PM Webert de Souza Lima wrote: > Thanks David. > Although you mentioned this was introduced with Luminous, it's working > with Jewel. > > ~# ceph osd pool stats

Re: [ceph-users] Question: CephFS + Bluestore

Thanks David. Although you mentioned this was introduced with Luminous, it's working with Jewel. ~# ceph osd pool stats Fri May 11 17:41:39 2018 pool rbd id 5 client io 505 kB/s rd, 3801 kB/s wr, 46 op/s rd, 27 op/s wr pool rbd_cache id 6 client io 2538 kB/s rd,

Re: [ceph-users] Question: CephFS + Bluestore

`ceph osd pool stats` with the option to specify the pool you are interested in should get you the breakdown of IO per pool. This was introduced with luminous. On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 2:39 PM Webert de Souza Lima wrote: > I think ceph doesn't have IO metrics will filters

Re: [ceph-users] Question: CephFS + Bluestore

I think ceph doesn't have IO metrics will filters by pool right? I see IO metrics from clients only: ceph_client_io_ops ceph_client_io_read_bytes ceph_client_io_read_ops ceph_client_io_write_bytes ceph_client_io_write_ops and pool "byte" metrics, but not "io":

Re: [ceph-users] Question: CephFS + Bluestore

Hey Jon! On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 12:11 PM, John Spray wrote: > It depends on the metadata intensity of your workload. It might be > quite interesting to gather some drive stats on how many IOPS are > currently hitting your metadata pool over a week of normal activity. > Any

Re: [ceph-users] Question: CephFS + Bluestore

On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 3:32 PM, Webert de Souza Lima wrote: > Hello, > > Currently, I run Jewel + Filestore for cephfs, with SSD-only pools used for > cephfs-metadata, and HDD-only pools for cephfs-data. The current > metadata/data ratio is something like 0,25% (50GB