Hi,Sage.
Yes, Firefly.
[root@ceph05 ~]# ceph --version
ceph version 0.80.8 (69eaad7f8308f21573c604f121956e64679a52a7)
Yes, I have seen this behavior.
[root@ceph08 ceph]# rbd info vm-160-disk-1
rbd image 'vm-160-disk-1':
size 32768 MB in 8192 objects
order 22 (4096 kB objects)
On Wed, 28 Jan 2015, Irek Fasikhov wrote:
> Sage.
> Is a sentence when deleting objects bypass the cache tier pool.
There's currently no knob or hint to do that. It would be pretty simple
to add, but it's a heuristic that only works for certain workloads..
sage
> Thank
>
> Wed Jan 28 2015
Sage.
Is a sentence when deleting objects bypass the cache tier pool.
Thank
Wed Jan 28 2015 at 5:13:36 PM, Irek Fasikhov :
> Hi,Sage.
>
> Yes, Firefly.
> [root@ceph05 ~]# ceph --version
> ceph version 0.80.8 (69eaad7f8308f21573c604f121956e64679a52a7)
>
> Yes, I have seen this behavior.
>
> [root@
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015, Irek Fasikhov wrote:
> Hi,All.
> Indeed, there is a problem. Removed 1 TB of data space on a cluster is not
> cleared. This feature of the behavior or a bug? And how long will it be
> cleaned?
Your subject says cache tier but I don't see it in the 'ceph df' output
below. The
Hi,All.
Indeed, there is a problem. Removed 1 TB of data space on a cluster is not
cleared. This feature of the behavior or a bug? And how long will it be
cleaned?
Sat Sep 20 2014 at 8:19:24 AM, Mikaël Cluseau :
> Hi all,
>
> I have weird behaviour on my firefly "test + convenience storage" clu
Hi all,
I have weird behaviour on my firefly "test + convenience storage"
cluster. It consists of 2 nodes with a light imbalance in available space:
# idweighttype nameup/downreweight
-114.58root default
-28.19host store-1
12.73osd.1up
