-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
No solution so far, but I also asked in IRC and linuxkidd told me they
where looking for a workaround.
Micha Krause
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
On 11/26/13, 3:31 PM, Shain Miley wrote:
Micha,
Did you ever figure out a work around for this issue?
I also had plans of using s3cmd to put, and recursively set acl's on a
nightly basis...however we are getting the 403 errors as well during our
testing.
I was just wondering if you
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 4:46 AM, Sebastian webmas...@mailz.de wrote:
Hi,
we have a setup of 4 Servers running ceph and radosgw. We use it as an
internal S3 service for our files. The Servers run Debian Squeeze with Ceph
0.67.4.
The cluster has been running smoothly for quite a while, but
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Dominik Mostowiec
dominikmostow...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We have 2 clusters with copy of objects.
On one of them we splited all large buckets (largest 17mln objects) to
256 buckets each (shards) and we have added 3 extra servers (6-9).
Old bucket was created in
On 13/11/13 21:16, lixuehui wrote:
Hi ,list
We've ever reflected that ,radosgw-agent sync data failed all the time ,before.
We paste the concert log here to seek any help now .
application/json; charset=UTF-8
Wed, 13 Nov 2013 07:24:45 GMT
x-amz-copy-source:sss%2Frgwconf
/sss/rgwconf
On 11/13/2013 09:06 PM, lixuehui wrote:
And on the slave zone gateway instence ,the info is like this :
2013-11-14 12:54:24.516840 7f51e7fef700 1 == starting new
request req=0xb1e3b0 =
2013-11-14 12:54:24.526640 7f51e7fef700 1 == req done
req=0xb1e3b0
Hi ,list
We've ever reflected that ,radosgw-agent sync data failed all the time ,before.
We paste the concert log here to seek any help now .
application/json; charset=UTF-8
Wed, 13 Nov 2013 07:24:45 GMT
x-amz-copy-source:sss%2Frgwconf
/sss/rgwconf
2013-11-13T15:24:45.510
My ceph.conf looks like this:
...
[client.admin]
keyring = /etc/ceph/ceph.client.admin.keyring
[client.radosgw.gateway]
host = eatr
keyring = /etc/ceph/keyring.radosgw.gateway
rgw socket path = /tmp/radosgw.sock
log file = /var/log/ceph/radosgw.log
When I do: ceph daemon osd.0 config show | grep socket
admin_socket: \/var\/run\/ceph\/ceph-osd.0.asok,
ms_inject_socket_failures: 0,
rgw_socket_path: ,
rgw_ops_log_socket_path: ,
why is the rgw_socket_path ?
Best
Sebastian
Am 09.11.2013 um 06:16 schrieb Yehuda Sadeh
Hello,
I was able to fix the problem by removing the client from the auth list:
ceph auth del client.radosgw.gateway
then adding again:
ceph auth add client.radosgw.gateway --in-file=/etc/ceph/keyring.radosgw.gateway
The keyring has the following caps:
[client.radosgw.gateway]
key =
All,
I have configured a rados gateway as per the Dumpling quick instructions on a
Red Hat 6 server. The idea is to use Swift API to access my cluster via this
interface.
Have configured FastCGI, httpd, as per the guides, did all the user
creations/authtool commands for the Swift
Hi,
I'm trying to set public ACLs to an object, so that I can access the object via
Web-browser.
unfortunately without success:
s3cmd setacl --acl-public s3://test/hosts
ERROR: S3 error: 403 (AccessDenied):
The radosgw log says:
x-amz-date:Fri, 08 Nov 2013 12:56:55 +
/test/hosts?acl
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 5:09 AM, Micha Krause mi...@krausam.de wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to set public ACLs to an object, so that I can access the object
via Web-browser.
unfortunately without success:
s3cmd setacl --acl-public s3://test/hosts
ERROR: S3 error: 403 (AccessDenied):
The radosgw
For #2, I just wrote a document on setting up a federated
architecture. You can view it here:
http://ceph.com/docs/master/radosgw/federated-config/ This
functionality will be available in the Emperor release.
The use case I described involved two zones in a master region talking
to the same
1. To build a high performance yet cheap radosgw storage, which pools should
be placed on ssd and which on hdd backed pools? Upon installation of
radosgw, it created the following pools: .rgw, .rgw.buckets,
.rgw.buckets.index, .rgw.control, .rgw.gc, .rgw.root, .usage, .users,
.users.email.
On 11/07/2013 09:48 AM, lixuehui wrote:
Hi all :
After we build a region with two zones distributed in two ceph
cluster.Start the agent ,it start works!
But what we find in the radosgw-agent stdout is that it failed to sync
objects all the time .Paste the info:
Hi list
We deploied a master zone and a slave zone in two clusters to test the
multi-locals backup . The radosgw-anget sync buckets successfully .We can find
the same buckets info in the slave zone .
But the running radosgw-agent throw out error info that objects
failed to sync , just like
Good day ceph users,
I'm new to ceph but installation went well so far. Now I have a lot of
questions regarding radosgw. Hope you don't mind...
1. To build a high performance yet cheap radosgw storage, which pools
should be placed on ssd and which on hdd backed pools? Upon installation of
It works so cool !Thanks so much from your help!
lixuehui
From: Josh Durgin
Date: 2013-10-31 01:31
To: Mark Kirkwood; lixuehui; ceph-users
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] radosgw-agent error
On 10/30/2013 01:54 AM, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
On 29/10/13 20:53, lixuehui wrote:
Hi,list
From
Sorry to bump this, but does anyone have any idea what could be wrong here?
To resummarize, radosgw fails to start. Debug output seems to indicate it is
complaining about the keyring, but the keyring is present and readable, and
other Ceph functions which require the keyring can success. So
Not sure why you're able to run the 'rados' and 'ceph' command, and
not 'radosgw', just note that the former two don't connect to the
osds, whereas the latter does, so it might fail on a different level.
You're using the default client.admin as the user for radosgw, but
your ceph.conf file doesn't
-Original Message-
From: Yehuda Sadeh [mailto:yeh...@inktank.com]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2013 12:40 PM
To: Gruher, Joseph R
Cc: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] radosgw fails to start
Not sure why you're able to run the 'rados' and 'ceph' command, and not
'radosgw
Adding some debug arguments has generated output which I believe indicates the
problem is my keyring is missing, but the keyring seems to be here. Why would
this complain about the keyring and fail to start?
[ceph@joceph08 ceph]$ sudo /usr/bin/radosgw -d --debug-rgw 20 --debug-ms 1 start
On 11/1/13, 2:07 PM, Gruher, Joseph R wrote:
Adding some debug arguments has generated output which I believe indicates
the problem is my keyring is missing, but the keyring seems to be here. Why
would this complain about the keyring and fail to start?
Hi,
Are you sure the user you are
-Original Message-
From: Derek Yarnell [mailto:de...@umiacs.umd.edu]
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2013 12:20 PM
To: Gruher, Joseph R; ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] radosgw fails to start
On 11/1/13, 2:07 PM, Gruher, Joseph R wrote:
Adding some debug arguments has
Hi,
I have strange radosgw error:
==
2013-10-26 21:18:29.844676 7f637beaf700 0 setting object
tag=_ZPeVs7d6W8GjU8qKr4dsilbGeo6NOgw
2013-10-26 21:18:30.049588 7f637beaf700 0 WARNING: set_req_state_err
err_no=125 resorting to 500
2013-10-26 21:18:30.049738 7f637beaf700 2 req
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 6:22 AM, Dominik Mostowiec
dominikmostow...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have strange radosgw error:
==
2013-10-26 21:18:29.844676 7f637beaf700 0 setting object
tag=_ZPeVs7d6W8GjU8qKr4dsilbGeo6NOgw
2013-10-26 21:18:30.049588 7f637beaf700 0 WARNING: set_req_state_err
To: de...@umiacs.umd.edu; Shain Miley; ceph-us...@ceph.com
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Radosgw and large files
Along those lines, you might want to use something similar to the
attached to check for any failed/partial uploads that are taking up
space (note cannot be gc'd away automatically). I just got
: ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com [ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] on
behalf of Shain Miley [smi...@npr.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 1:27 PM
To: Mark Kirkwood; de...@umiacs.umd.edu; ceph-us...@ceph.com
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Radosgw and large files
Mark,
Thanks for the update
, October 31, 2013 1:27 PM
To: Mark Kirkwood; de...@umiacs.umd.edu; ceph-us...@ceph.com
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Radosgw and large files
Mark,
Thanks for the update.
Just an FYI I ran into an issue using the script when it turned out that the
last part of the file was exactly 0 bytes. in length
...@lists.ceph.com] on behalf of Shain Miley
[smi...@npr.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 1:27 PM
To: Mark Kirkwood; de...@umiacs.umd.edu; ceph-us...@ceph.com
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Radosgw and large files
Mark,
Thanks for the update.
Just an FYI I ran into an issue using the script when it turned
Hi Derek,
I've the same problem with the usage. How does your pools list look like
now ('radosgw-admin pools list') ?
Cheers,
Valery
On 23/10/13 22:32 , Derek Yarnell wrote:
Hi,
So the problem was that '.usage' pool was not created. I haven't
traversed the code well enough yet to know
On 29/10/13 20:53, lixuehui wrote:
Hi,list
From the document that a radosgw-agent's right info should like this
INFO:radosgw_agent.sync:Starting incremental sync
INFO:radosgw_agent.worker:17910 is processing shard number 0
INFO:radosgw_agent.worker:shard 0 has 0 entries
Hi Derek,
I'm wondering if your radosgw client does not have read-write (rw) caps on
mon? See the section Monitor Key CAPS on
http://ceph.com/docs/next/radosgw/config/ for more info.
-Matt
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Derek Yarnell de...@umiacs.umd.edu wrote:
Hi,
So the problem was
On 10/30/13, 5:48 AM, Matt Thompson wrote:
Hi Derek,
I'm wondering if your radosgw client does not have read-write (rw) caps
on mon? See the section Monitor Key CAPS
on http://ceph.com/docs/next/radosgw/config/ for more info.
Hi Matt,
You are right. I had forgotten that I didn't allow
On 10/30/13, 4:53 AM, Valery Tschopp wrote:
radosgw-admin pools list
Hi Valery,
That command lists the data placement pool(s) within radosgw (different
than what I was having problems with). My problem was that I didn't
have the correct underlying rados pool(s) created. They are listed here:
On 10/30/2013 01:54 AM, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
On 29/10/13 20:53, lixuehui wrote:
Hi,list
From the document that a radosgw-agent's right info should like this
INFO:radosgw_agent.sync:Starting incremental sync
INFO:radosgw_agent.worker:17910 is processing shard number 0
Hi all-
Trying to set up object storage on CentOS. I've done this successfully on
Ubuntu but I'm having some trouble on CentOS. I think I have everything
configured but when I try to start the radosgw service it reports starting, but
then the status is not running, with no helpful output as
On 31/10/13 06:31, Josh Durgin wrote:
Note that the wip in the url means it's a work-in-progress branch,
so it's not totally ready yet either. If anything is confusing or
missing, let us know.
It's great people are interested in trying this early. It's very
helpful to find issues sooner (like
Along those lines, you might want to use something similar to the
attached to check for any failed/partial uploads that are taking up
space (note cannot be gc'd away automatically). I just got caught by this.
In fact the previous code I posted should probably use a try:... except:
block to
On 29/10/13 18:08, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
On 29/10/13 17:46, Yehuda Sadeh wrote:
The multipart abort operation is supposed to remove the objects (no gc
needed for these). Were there any other issues during the run, e.g.,
restarted gateways, failed requests, etc.?
Note that the objects here are
Hi,list
From the document that a radosgw-agent's right info should like this
INFO:radosgw_agent.sync:Starting incremental sync
INFO:radosgw_agent.worker:17910 is processing shard number 0
INFO:radosgw_agent.worker:shard 0 has 0 entries after ''
INFO:radosgw_agent.worker:finished processing shard 0
: Monday, October 28, 2013 1:04 AM
To: de...@umiacs.umd.edu; Shain Miley; ceph-us...@ceph.com
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Radosgw and large files
I was looking at the same thing myself, and Boto seems to work ok
(tested a 6G file - some sample code attached).
Regards
Mark
On 27/10/13 11:46, Derek
That looks like a permissions problem. I've updated the draft
document here: http://ceph.com/docs/wip-doc-radosgw/radosgw/federated-config/
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 2:25 AM, lixuehui lixue...@chinacloud.com.cn wrote:
Hi all
Today I'd like to replicated one cluster with gateway.After master
I have a radosgw instance (ceph 0.71-299-g5cba838 src build), running on
Ubuntu 13.10. I've been experimenting with multipart uploads (which are
working fine). However while *most* objects (from radosgw perspective)
have their storage space gc'd after a while post deletion, I'm seeing
what
I was looking at the same thing myself, and Boto seems to work ok
(tested a 6G file - some sample code attached).
Regards
Mark
On 27/10/13 11:46, Derek Yarnell wrote:
Hi Shain,
Yes we have tested and have working S3 Multipart support for files 5GB
(RHEL64/0.67.4).
However, crossftp unless
Hi,
radosgw-admin object unlink can do stomething like 'blind bucket'
(object in bucket without rgw index)?
--
Regards
Dominik
2013/10/13 Dominik Mostowiec dominikmostow...@gmail.com:
hmm, 'tail' - do you mean file/object content?
I thought that this command might be workaround for 'blind
No. The object unlink option is to delete an object via radosgw-admin.
It has nothing to do with index-less buckets.
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Dominik Mostowiec
dominikmostow...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
radosgw-admin object unlink can do stomething like 'blind bucket'
(object in bucket
Hi,
I am wondering if anyone has successfully been able to upload files larger than
5GB using radosgw.
I have tried using various clients, including dragondisk, crossftp, s3cmd,
etc...all of them have failed with a 'permission denied' response.
Each of the clients say they support multi-part
Hi Shain,
Yes we have tested and have working S3 Multipart support for files 5GB
(RHEL64/0.67.4).
However, crossftp unless you have pro it would seem does not support
multipart. Dragondisk gives the error that I have seen when using a PUT
and not multipart, EntityTooLarge. My guess is that it
; ceph-us...@ceph.com
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Radosgw and large files
Hi Shain,
Yes we have tested and have working S3 Multipart support for files 5GB
(RHEL64/0.67.4).
However, crossftp unless you have pro it would seem does not support
multipart. Dragondisk gives the error that I have seen when
[smi...@npr.org]
Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2013 7:25 PM
To: de...@umiacs.umd.edu; ceph-us...@ceph.com
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Radosgw and large files
I'll try the pro version of crossftp as soon as I have a chance.
Here is the output using s3cmd version 1.1.0-beta3:
root@theneykov:/mnt/samba
...@lists.ceph.com] on
behalf of Shain Miley [smi...@npr.org]
Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2013 7:25 PM
To: de...@umiacs.umd.edu; ceph-us...@ceph.com
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Radosgw and large files
I'll try the pro version of crossftp as soon as I have a chance.
Here is the output using s3cmd version 1.1.0-beta3
On 10/23/2013 09:27 AM, lixuehui wrote:
Hi all
We know that radosgw supported a subset of Amazon s3 functional
features.Does radosgw support server-side encryption algorithm ,when
creating an object,through Amazon s3 api support AES256 on server-side?
Or can we use client-side encryption
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Derek Yarnell de...@umiacs.umd.edu wrote:
So I have tried to enable usage logging on a new production Ceph RadosGW
cluster but nothing seems to show up.
I have added to the [client.radosgw.] section the following
rgw enable usage log = true
rgw usage log
Try moving the above configurables to the global section, if it's
working then you're probably using the wrong section.
Moving sections doesn't seem to change the behavior. My two other test
gateways seems to be working fine with similar configs all running
0.67.4 (slightly patched for
So I have tried to enable usage logging on a new production Ceph RadosGW
cluster but nothing seems to show up.
I have added to the [client.radosgw.] section the following
rgw enable usage log = true
rgw usage log tick interval = 30
rgw usage log flush threshold = 1024
rgw usage max shards = 32
Hi Derek,
Sorry, I added the caps, but didn't restarted the radosgw process. After
a restart it works :)
Cheers,
Valery
On 16/10/13 17:20 , Derek Yarnell wrote:
On 10/16/13 4:26 AM, Valery Tschopp wrote:
Hi Derek,
Thanks for your example.
I've added caps='metadata=*', but I still have an
Hello,
when i set a read permission for all users to the bucket i read only the
content of the bucket but i received access denied for all directory
and sub-directory inside this bucket.
Where i wrong???
Many thanks
Fabio
___
ceph-users mailing list
On 10/16/13 5:15 AM, Fabio - NS3 srl wrote:
Hello,
when i set a read permission for all users to the bucket i read only the
content of the bucket but i received access denied for all directory
and sub-directory inside this bucket.
Where i wrong???
Hi Fabio,
This is the default S3
On 10/16/13 4:26 AM, Valery Tschopp wrote:
Hi Derek,
Thanks for your example.
I've added caps='metadata=*', but I still have an error and get:
send: 'GET /admin/metadata/user?format=json HTTP/1.1\r\nHost:
objects.bcc.switch.ch\r\nAccept-Encoding: identity\r\nDate: Wed, 16 Oct
2013
Thanks, Yehuda, for your reply. I think you may be right because I did
another experiment which seems there might be a reference to an object. I
am just curious to do that for some corner case.
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 12:39 AM, Yehuda Sadeh yeh...@inktank.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at
Hi Derek,
Thanks. Is the 'radosgw-admin metadata list user' also available as REST
API?
Cheers,
Valery
On 15/10/13 03:21 , Derek Yarnell wrote:
root@ineri:~# radosgw-admin user info
could not fetch user info: no user info saved
Hi Valery,
You need to use
radosgw-admin metadata list
On 10/15/13 12:00 PM, Valery Tschopp wrote:
Hi Derek,
Thanks. Is the 'radosgw-admin metadata list user' also available as REST
API?
Hi Valery,
Yes, it is. Not well documented I believe right now. I have this
tested and working in my python bindings[1] for the radosgw (get_users).
You
We upgraded from 0.61.8 to 0.67.4.
The metadata commands works for the users and the buckets:
root@ineri ~$ radosgw-admin metadata list bucket
[
a4mesh,
61a75c04-34a5-11e3-9bea-8f8d15b5cf20,
6e22de72-34a5-11e3-afc4-d3f70b676c52,
...
root@ineri ~$ radosgw-admin metadata list user
[
Hi ceph-users,
I uploaded an object successfully to radosgw with 3 replicas. And I located
all the physical paths of 3 replicas on different OSDs.
i.e, one of the 3 physical paths is
/var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-2/current/3.5_head/DIR_D/default.4896.65\\u20131014\\u1__head_0646563D__3
Then I manually
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 4:04 AM, david zhang zhang.david2...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi ceph-users,
I uploaded an object successfully to radosgw with 3 replicas. And I located
all the physical paths of 3 replicas on different OSDs.
i.e, one of the 3 physical paths is
root@ineri:~# radosgw-admin user info
could not fetch user info: no user info saved
Hi Valery,
You need to use
radosgw-admin metadata list user
Thanks,
derek
--
---
Derek T. Yarnell
University of Maryland
Institute for Advanced Computer Studies
This sends the objects through the removal process. If the object has
a 'tail', then it's going to be removed later by the garbage
collector.
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Dominik Mostowiec
dominikmostow...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks :-)
This command removes object from rgw index (not mark
hmm, 'tail' - do you mean file/object content?
I thought that this command might be workaround for 'blind bucket'.
Am I wrong?
--
Regards
Dominik
2013/10/13 Yehuda Sadeh yeh...@inktank.com:
This sends the objects through the removal process. If the object has
a 'tail', then it's going to be
Hi,
How works radosgw-admin object unlink?
After:
radosgw-admin object unlink --bucket=testbucket 'test_file_1001.txt'
File still exists in bucket list:
s3 -u list testbucket | grep 'test_file_1001.txt'
test_file_1001.txt 2013-10-11T11:46:54Z 5
ceph -v
ceph
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Dominik Mostowiec
dominikmostow...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
How works radosgw-admin object unlink?
After:
radosgw-admin object unlink --bucket=testbucket 'test_file_1001.txt'
Try:
$ radosgw-admin object unlink --bucket=testbucket --object='test_file_1001.txt'
Hi,
Since we upgraded ceph to 0.67.4, the radosgw-admin doesn't list all the
users anymore:
root@ineri:~# radosgw-admin user info
could not fetch user info: no user info saved
But it still work for single user:
root@ineri:~# radosgw-admin user info --uid=valery
{ user_id: valery,
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Valery Tschopp
valery.tsch...@switch.ch wrote:
Hi,
Since we upgraded ceph to 0.67.4, the radosgw-admin doesn't list all the
users anymore:
root@ineri:~# radosgw-admin user info
could not fetch user info: no user info saved
But it still work for single
Hello again,
In fact, I have still a problem...
I can do GET requests without problems,
but when I try to do a PUT request, to create a user, then I get a
Code: AccessDenied return.
I do it with this code :
def user_create (uid, acess_key, secret_key, email):
url =
On 10/10/13 2:36 PM, Matt Thompson wrote:
Accidentally replied to Alexis directly, but this works for me:
url =
'http://%s/admin/user?uid=someuserdisplay-name=somenameformat=json' %
server
r = requests.put(url, auth=S3Auth(aws_key, secret, server))
Note that display-name is a required
Hello to all,
I can't succeed in using the Admin Ops REST API for radosgw.
Where can I find an example, in any language (Perl, Python, Bash) ?
For instance, how to proceed to get info for user xxx ?
Via cli, i do radosgw user info --uid=xxx
but with the REST API ?
Thanks for your answers.
Via cli, i do radosgw user info --uid=xxx
but with the REST API ?
Hi Alexis,
Here is a simple python example on how to use the admin api. You will
need to get a few packages from the cheese shop (virtualenv + pip makes
this easy).
pip install requests-aws
You will also need to set the
Great !
Thanks a lot. It works.
I didn't know awsauth module.
Thanks again.
2013/10/9 Derek Yarnell de...@umiacs.umd.edu:
Via cli, i do radosgw user info --uid=xxx
but with the REST API ?
Hi Alexis,
Here is a simple python example on how to use the admin api. You will
need to get a few
On 10/1/13 11:37 AM, Fuchs, Andreas (SwissTXT) wrote:
What we need to do is to have a key/secret with read write permission and one
with read only permission to a certain bucket, is this possible? How?
Hi Andi,
Yes this is possible. You can either create accounts for the radosgw
through the
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Jefferson Alcantara
jefferson22alcant...@gmail.com wrote:
hi ,
I need help for show all users created on radosgw-admin all users using
buckets or not ,I dont find any attribute for show this , I tried
radosgw-admin user info -iud=* but this options does
After upgrading from Cuddlefish to Dumpling I am no longer able to obtain user
information from the rados gateway.
radosgw-admin user infocould not fetch user info: no user info saved
radosgw-admin user create --uid=bob --display-name=bobcould not create user:
unable to create user, unable to
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Mike O'Toole mike.oto...@outlook.com wrote:
After upgrading from Cuddlefish to Dumpling I am no longer able to obtain
user information from the rados gateway.
radosgw-admin user info
could not fetch user info: no user info saved
radosgw-admin user create
-
From: ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com [mailto:ceph-users-
boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf Of Yehuda Sadeh
Sent: Donnerstag, 26. September 2013 16:52
To: Mike O'Toole
Cc: ceph-us...@ceph.com
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] radosgw-admin unable to list or store user info
after upgrade
On Thu
: { access_key: ,
secret_key: },
placement_pools: []}
rados lspools
data
metadata
rbd
.rgw
.rgw.gc
.rgw.control
.users.uid
.users
.users.email
.rgw.buckets
.log
.usage
.rgw.root
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 09:05:08 -0700
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] radosgw-admin unable to list
/radosgw_user_create.out
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 10:02:51 -0700
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] radosgw-admin unable to list or store user info
after upgrade
From: yeh...@inktank.com
To: mike.oto...@outlook.com; ceph-de...@vger.kernel.org
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Mike O'Toole mike.oto...@outlook.com
Hi guys,
How do I get a list of all users with the radosgw-admin command and/or
REST API?
# radosgw-admin --version
ceph version 0.61.8 (a6fdcca3bddbc9f177e4e2bf0d9cdd85006b028b)
Cheers,
Valery
--
SWITCH
--
Valery Tschopp, Software Engineer, Peta Solutions
Werdstrasse
Hi Ceph Users
We setup a radosgw per ceph doku. While everything works fine we found out that
different access_keys share the same bucket namespace.
So when access_key A creates a bucket test access_key B cannot create a
bucket with name test.
Is it possible to separate the account's so that
hello
i do not understand what is mean An admin API request will be done on a
URI that starts with the configurable ‘admin’ resource entry point. live in
http://ceph.com/docs/master/radosgw/adminops/ , can anyone explain what should
i do in my ceph ! it is mean configure the ceph.conf??
Hi,
currently different users share the same namespace. This follows the
S3 semantics, and allows accessing buckets directly via a virtual host
name. We do have multiple namespaces in mind though, and I also
prototyped it not too long ago:
hi
So what am I doing wrong? when i run commond:
radosgw-admin bucket list --uid=johdone the return is []
and the commond
radosgw-admin bucket list --uid=wkp4666 the return is []
and the commond
radosgw-admin bucket listthe return is [mybucket1, mybucket2]
mybucket1's owner is
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 7:21 PM, 鹏 wkp4...@126.com wrote:
hi
So what am I doing wrong? when i run commond:
radosgw-admin bucket list --uid=johdone the return is []
and the commond
radosgw-admin bucket list --uid=wkp4666 the return is []
and the commond
radosgw-admin bucket list
Thanks, I'll disable it later. perhaps that's related to another problem I
had here.
By my network topology plan. I expect that the max bandwidth could reach
to 10Gb. I double checked every connection in this cluster by iperf.
*[Iperf]*
From BM to RadosGW
local 192.168.2.51 port 5001 connected
= false to client.radosgw01.hostname in ceph.conf
No change in terms of performance
-Original Message-
From: Yehuda Sadeh [mailto:yeh...@inktank.com]
Sent: Donnerstag, 12. September 2013 06:38
To: Kuo Hugo
Cc: Fuchs, Andreas (SwissTXT); ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
Subject: Re: [ceph-users
to use also the radosgw admin socket (if you manage to set it up).
Yehuda
-Original Message-
From: Yehuda Sadeh [mailto:yeh...@inktank.com]
Sent: Donnerstag, 12. September 2013 06:38
To: Kuo Hugo
Cc: Fuchs, Andreas (SwissTXT); ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] [RadosGW
Cc: Fuchs, Andreas (SwissTXT); ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] [RadosGW] Performance for Concurrency
Connections
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 9:34 PM, Kuo Hugo tonyt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Yehuda,
Here's my ceph.conf
root@p01:/tmp# cat /etc/ceph/ceph.conf
Hi Yehuda,
Here's my ceph.conf
root@p01:/tmp# cat /etc/ceph/ceph.conf
[global]
fsid = 6e05675c-f545-4d88-9784-ea56ceda750e
mon_initial_members = s01, s02, s03
mon_host = 192.168.2.61,192.168.2.62,192.168.2.63
auth_supported = cephx
osd_journal_size = 1024
filestore_xattr_use_omap = true
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 9:34 PM, Kuo Hugo tonyt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Yehuda,
Here's my ceph.conf
root@p01:/tmp# cat /etc/ceph/ceph.conf
[global]
fsid = 6e05675c-f545-4d88-9784-ea56ceda750e
mon_initial_members = s01, s02, s03
mon_host = 192.168.2.61,192.168.2.62,192.168.2.63
Hmm Interesting now.
I have no admin socket opened around.
root@p01:/var/run/ceph# ls /var/run/ceph -al
total 0
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 40 Sep 9 07:47 .
drwxr-xr-x 17 root root 600 Sep 11 21:23 ..
root@p01:/var/run/ceph# lsof | grep radosgw.asok
root@p01:/var/run/ceph#
I review the
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 9:57 PM, Kuo Hugo tonyt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm Interesting now.
I have no admin socket opened around.
Maybe your radosgw process doesn't have permissions to write into /var/run/ceph?
root@p01:/var/run/ceph# ls /var/run/ceph -al
total 0
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root
801 - 900 of 966 matches
Mail list logo
