Ok, thanks for confirming.
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 7:32 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote:
> Nope. This is a theoretical possibility but would take a lot of code
> change that nobody has embarked upon yet.
> -Greg
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 2:16 PM Sergio A. de Carvalho Jr. <
>
Nope. This is a theoretical possibility but would take a lot of code change
that nobody has embarked upon yet.
-Greg
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 2:16 PM Sergio A. de Carvalho Jr. <
scarvalh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is it possible to create a pool where the minimum number of replicas for
>
Hi all,
Is it possible to create a pool where the minimum number of replicas for
the write operation to be confirmed is 2 but the minimum number of replicas
to allow the object to be read is 1?
This would be useful when a pool consists of immutable objects, so we'd
have:
* size 3 (we always keep