Re: [ceph-users] The first infernalis dev release will be v9.0.0

2015-05-06 Thread Joao Eduardo Luis
On 05/05/2015 08:54 PM, Steffen W Sørensen wrote: > >> On 05/05/2015, at 18.52, Sage Weil wrote: >> >> On Tue, 5 May 2015, Tony Harris wrote: >>> So with this, will even numbers then be LTS? Since 9.0.0 is following >>> 0.94.x/Hammer, and every other release is normally LTS, I'm guessing 10.x.x,

Re: [ceph-users] The first infernalis dev release will be v9.0.0

2015-05-05 Thread Steffen W Sørensen
> On 05/05/2015, at 18.52, Sage Weil wrote: > > On Tue, 5 May 2015, Tony Harris wrote: >> So with this, will even numbers then be LTS? Since 9.0.0 is following >> 0.94.x/Hammer, and every other release is normally LTS, I'm guessing 10.x.x, >> 12.x.x, etc. will be LTS... > > It looks that way n

Re: [ceph-users] The first infernalis dev release will be v9.0.0

2015-05-05 Thread Sage Weil
On Tue, 5 May 2015, Tony Harris wrote: > So with this, will even numbers then be LTS?  Since 9.0.0 is following > 0.94.x/Hammer, and every other release is normally LTS, I'm guessing 10.x.x, > 12.x.x, etc. will be LTS... It looks that way now, although I can't promise the pattern will hold! sage_

Re: [ceph-users] The first infernalis dev release will be v9.0.0

2015-05-05 Thread Tony Harris
So with this, will even numbers then be LTS? Since 9.0.0 is following 0.94.x/Hammer, and every other release is normally LTS, I'm guessing 10.x.x, 12.x.x, etc. will be LTS... On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Sage Weil wrote: > On Tue, 5 May 2015, Joao Eduardo Luis wrote: > > On 05/04/2015 05:09

Re: [ceph-users] The first infernalis dev release will be v9.0.0

2015-05-05 Thread Sage Weil
On Tue, 5 May 2015, Joao Eduardo Luis wrote: > On 05/04/2015 05:09 PM, Sage Weil wrote: > > The first Ceph release back in Jan of 2008 was 0.1. That made sense at > > the time. We haven't revised the versioning scheme since then, however, > > and are now at 0.94.1 (first Hammer point release).

Re: [ceph-users] The first infernalis dev release will be v9.0.0

2015-05-05 Thread Joao Eduardo Luis
On 05/04/2015 05:09 PM, Sage Weil wrote: > The first Ceph release back in Jan of 2008 was 0.1. That made sense at > the time. We haven't revised the versioning scheme since then, however, > and are now at 0.94.1 (first Hammer point release). To avoid reaching > 0.99 (and 0.100 or 1.00?) we ha

Re: [ceph-users] The first infernalis dev release will be v9.0.0

2015-05-04 Thread Loic Dachary
+1 ;-) On 04/05/2015 18:09, Sage Weil wrote: > The first Ceph release back in Jan of 2008 was 0.1. That made sense at > the time. We haven't revised the versioning scheme since then, however, > and are now at 0.94.1 (first Hammer point release). To avoid reaching > 0.99 (and 0.100 or 1.00?)

[ceph-users] The first infernalis dev release will be v9.0.0

2015-05-04 Thread Sage Weil
The first Ceph release back in Jan of 2008 was 0.1. That made sense at the time. We haven't revised the versioning scheme since then, however, and are now at 0.94.1 (first Hammer point release). To avoid reaching 0.99 (and 0.100 or 1.00?) we have a new strategy. This was discussed a bit on