Hi,
I’m slightly confused about one thing we are observing at the moment. We’re
testing the shutdown/removal of OSD servers and noticed twice as much
backfilling as expected. This is what we did:
1. service ceph stop on some OSD servers.
2. ceph osd out for the above OSDs (to avoid waiting for
Here’s a more direct question. Given this osd tree:
# ceph osd tree |head
# idweight type name up/down reweight
-1 2952root default
-2 2952room 0513-R-0050
-3 262.1 rack RJ35
...
-14 135.8 rack RJ57
-51 0
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 6:27 AM, Dan Van Der Ster
daniel.vanders...@cern.ch wrote:
Here’s a more direct question. Given this osd tree:
# ceph osd tree |head
# idweight type name up/down reweight
-1 2952root default
-2 2952room 0513-R-0050
-3 262.1
Thanks Greg. One thought I had is that I might try just crush rm'ing the OSD
instead of or just after marking it out... That should avoid the double
rebalance, right?
Cheers, Dan
On Jan 9, 2014 7:57 PM, Gregory Farnum g...@inktank.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 6:27 AM, Dan Van Der Ster
