[ceph-users] bcache vs flashcache vs cache tiering

2017-02-14 Thread Dongsheng Yang
Hi Sage and all, We are going to use SSDs for cache in ceph. But I am not sure which one is the best solution, bcache? flashcache? or cache tier? I found there are some CAUTION in ceph.com about cache tiering. Is cache tiering is already production ready? especially for rbd. thanx in adv

Re: [ceph-users] bcache vs flashcache vs cache tiering

2017-02-14 Thread Nick Fisk
> -Original Message- > From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf Of > Dongsheng Yang > Sent: 14 February 2017 09:01 > To: Sage Weil > Cc: ceph-de...@vger.kernel.org; ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > Subject: [ceph-users] bcache vs flashc

Re: [ceph-users] bcache vs flashcache vs cache tiering

2017-02-14 Thread Wido den Hollander
t; Cc: ceph-de...@vger.kernel.org; ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > > Subject: [ceph-users] bcache vs flashcache vs cache tiering > > > > Hi Sage and all, > > We are going to use SSDs for cache in ceph. But I am not sure which > > one is the best solution, bcache? flashcache? or c

Re: [ceph-users] bcache vs flashcache vs cache tiering

2017-02-14 Thread Nick Fisk
> -Original Message- > From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@42on.com] > Sent: 14 February 2017 16:25 > To: Dongsheng Yang ; n...@fisk.me.uk > Cc: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > Subject: Re: [ceph-users] bcache vs flashcache vs cache tiering > > > > Op 14 febru

Re: [ceph-users] bcache vs flashcache vs cache tiering

2017-02-14 Thread Tomasz Kuzemko
h-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf Of >>> Dongsheng Yang >>> Sent: 14 February 2017 09:01 >>> To: Sage Weil >>> Cc: ceph-de...@vger.kernel.org; ceph-users@lists.ceph.com >>> Subject: [ceph-users] bcache vs flashcache vs cache tiering >>> >>&g

Re: [ceph-users] bcache vs flashcache vs cache tiering

2017-02-14 Thread Gregory Farnum
>> > Sent: 14 February 2017 09:01 >> > To: Sage Weil >> > Cc: ceph-de...@vger.kernel.org; ceph-users@lists.ceph.com >> > Subject: [ceph-users] bcache vs flashcache vs cache tiering >> > >> > Hi Sage and all, >> > We are going to u

Re: [ceph-users] bcache vs flashcache vs cache tiering

2017-02-14 Thread Nick Fisk
> -Original Message- > From: Gregory Farnum [mailto:gfar...@redhat.com] > Sent: 14 February 2017 21:05 > To: Wido den Hollander > Cc: Dongsheng Yang ; Nick Fisk > ; Ceph Users > Subject: Re: [ceph-users] bcache vs flashcache vs cache tiering > > On Tue, Fe

Re: [ceph-users] bcache vs flashcache vs cache tiering

2017-02-14 Thread Christian Balzer
> -Original Message- > > >> > From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On > > >> > Behalf Of Dongsheng Yang > > >> > Sent: 14 February 2017 09:01 > > >> > To: Sage Weil > > >> > Cc: ceph-de...@

Re: [ceph-users] bcache vs flashcache vs cache tiering

2017-02-14 Thread Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
>>> Cc: Dongsheng Yang ; Nick Fisk >>> ; Ceph Users >>> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] bcache vs flashcache vs cache tiering >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 8:25 AM, Wido den Hollander >>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Op 14 febr

Re: [ceph-users] bcache vs flashcache vs cache tiering

2017-02-15 Thread Dongsheng Yang
Hollander Cc: Dongsheng Yang ; Nick Fisk ; Ceph Users Subject: Re: [ceph-users] bcache vs flashcache vs cache tiering On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 8:25 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: Op 14 februari 2017 om 11:14 schreef Nick Fisk : -Original Message- From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun

Re: [ceph-users] bcache vs flashcache vs cache tiering

2017-02-15 Thread Nick Fisk
> -Original Message- > From: Christian Balzer [mailto:ch...@gol.com] > Sent: 15 February 2017 01:42 > To: 'Ceph Users' > Cc: Nick Fisk ; 'Gregory Farnum' > Subject: Re: [ceph-users] bcache vs flashcache vs cache tiering > > On Tue

Re: [ceph-users] bcache vs flashcache vs cache tiering

2017-02-15 Thread Nick Fisk
> -Original Message- > From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf Of > Nick Fisk > Sent: 15 February 2017 09:53 > To: 'Christian Balzer' ; 'Ceph Users' us...@lists.ceph.com> > Subject: Re: [ceph-users] bcache vs flashca

Re: [ceph-users] bcache vs flashcache vs cache tiering

2017-02-15 Thread Sage Weil
On Wed, 15 Feb 2017, Nick Fisk wrote: > Just an update. I spoke to Sage today and the general consensus is that > something like bcache or dmcache is probably the long term goal, but work > needs to be done before its ready for prime time. The current tiering > functionality won't be going away in

Re: [ceph-users] bcache vs flashcache vs cache tiering

2017-02-15 Thread Nick Fisk
> On Wed, 15 Feb 2017, Nick Fisk wrote: > > Just an update. I spoke to Sage today and the general consensus is > > that something like bcache or dmcache is probably the long term goal, > > but work needs to be done before its ready for prime time. The current > > tiering functionality won't be goi

Re: [ceph-users] bcache vs flashcache vs cache tiering

2017-02-15 Thread Christian Balzer
Hello Sage, On Wed, 15 Feb 2017 22:10:26 + (UTC) Sage Weil wrote: > On Wed, 15 Feb 2017, Nick Fisk wrote: > > Just an update. I spoke to Sage today and the general consensus is that > > something like bcache or dmcache is probably the long term goal, but work > > needs to be done before its

Re: [ceph-users] bcache vs flashcache vs cache tiering

2017-02-16 Thread Dongsheng Yang
: Gregory Farnum [mailto:gfar...@redhat.com] Sent: 14 February 2017 21:05 To: Wido den Hollander Cc: Dongsheng Yang ; Nick Fisk ; Ceph Users Subject: Re: [ceph-users] bcache vs flashcache vs cache tiering On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 8:25 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: Op 14 februari 2017 om 11:14

Re: [ceph-users] bcache vs flashcache vs cache tiering

2017-02-16 Thread Benjeman Meekhof
17, 06:42, Nick Fisk wrote: >>>> >>>> -Original Message- >>>> From: Gregory Farnum [mailto:gfar...@redhat.com] >>>> Sent: 14 February 2017 21:05 >>>> To: Wido den Hollander >>>> Cc: Dongsheng Yang ; Nick Fisk >>>&g