Does the bluestore min alloc size apply for 4k block-size files [1]?
[1] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/blob/master/src/common/config_opts.h#L1063
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:51 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Pavel Shub wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Gregor
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Pavel Shub wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 1:26 PM, Pavel Shub wrote:
>>> Hey All,
>>>
>>> I'm running a test of bluestore in a small VM and seeing 2x overhead
>>> for each object in cephfs. Here's the ou
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 1:26 PM, Pavel Shub wrote:
>> Hey All,
>>
>> I'm running a test of bluestore in a small VM and seeing 2x overhead
>> for each object in cephfs. Here's the output of df detail
>> https://gist.github.com/pavel-citymaps
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 1:26 PM, Pavel Shub wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> I'm running a test of bluestore in a small VM and seeing 2x overhead
> for each object in cephfs. Here's the output of df detail
> https://gist.github.com/pavel-citymaps/868a7c4b1c43cea9ab86cdf2e79198ee
>
> This is on a VM with all
Hey All,
I'm running a test of bluestore in a small VM and seeing 2x overhead
for each object in cephfs. Here's the output of df detail
https://gist.github.com/pavel-citymaps/868a7c4b1c43cea9ab86cdf2e79198ee
This is on a VM with all daemons & 20gb disk, all pools are of size 1.
Is this the expect
Hey All,
I'm running a test of bluestore in a small VM and seeing 2x overhead
for each object. Here's the output of df detail:
GLOBAL:
SIZE AVAIL RAW USED %RAW USED OBJECTS
20378M 14469M5909M 29.00772k
POOLS:
NAMEID CA
