On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 8:58 PM Rom Freiman wrote:
>
> Same kernel :)
Not exactly the point I had in mind, but sure ;)
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019, 12:49 Brad Hubbard wrote:
>>
>> Haha, in the email thread he says CentOS but the bug is opened against RHEL
>> :P
>>
>> Is it worth recommending a
Done.
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 3:36 PM Ilya Dryomov wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 11:58 AM Rom Freiman wrote:
> >
> > Same kernel :)
>
> Rom, can you update your CentOS ticket with the link to the Ceph BZ?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ilya
>
___
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 11:58 AM Rom Freiman wrote:
>
> Same kernel :)
Rom, can you update your CentOS ticket with the link to the Ceph BZ?
Thanks,
Ilya
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listin
Same kernel :)
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019, 12:49 Brad Hubbard wrote:
> Haha, in the email thread he says CentOS but the bug is opened against
> RHEL :P
>
> Is it worth recommending a fix in skb_can_coalesce() upstream so other
> modules don't hit this?
>
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 7:39 PM Ilya Dryomov
Haha, in the email thread he says CentOS but the bug is opened against RHEL :P
Is it worth recommending a fix in skb_can_coalesce() upstream so other
modules don't hit this?
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 7:39 PM Ilya Dryomov wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 1:38 AM Brad Hubbard wrote:
> >
> > On Fr
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 1:38 AM Brad Hubbard wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 9:57 AM Jason Dillaman wrote:
> >
> > I think Ilya recently looked into a bug that can occur when
> > CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY is enabled and the IO's TCP message goes
> > through the loopback interface (i.e. co-locat
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 9:57 AM Jason Dillaman wrote:
>
> I think Ilya recently looked into a bug that can occur when
> CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY is enabled and the IO's TCP message goes
> through the loopback interface (i.e. co-located OSDs and krbd).
> Assuming that you have the same setup, you m
I think Ilya recently looked into a bug that can occur when
CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY is enabled and the IO's TCP message goes
through the loopback interface (i.e. co-located OSDs and krbd).
Assuming that you have the same setup, you might be hitting the same
bug.
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 6:46 PM Br
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 12:20 AM Rom Freiman wrote:
>
> Hey,
> After upgrading to centos7.6, I started encountering the following kernel
> panic
>
> [17845.147263] XFS (rbd4): Unmounting Filesystem
> [17846.860221] rbd: rbd4: capacity 3221225472 features 0x1
> [17847.109887] XFS (rbd4): Mounting
Hey,
After upgrading to centos7.6, I started encountering the following kernel
panic
[17845.147263] XFS (rbd4): Unmounting Filesystem
[17846.860221] rbd: rbd4: capacity 3221225472 features 0x1
[17847.109887] XFS (rbd4): Mounting V5 Filesystem
[17847.191646] XFS (rbd4): Ending clean mount
[17861.66
10 matches
Mail list logo
