Re: [ceph-users] ceph-fuse, fio largely better after migration Infernalis to Jewel, is my bench relevant?

On 06/06/2016 18:41, Gregory Farnum wrote: > We had several metadata caching improvements in ceph-fuse recently which I > think went in after Infernalis. That could explain it. Ok, in this case, it could be good news. ;) I had doubts concerning my fio bench. I know that benchs can be tricky

Re: [ceph-users] ceph-fuse, fio largely better after migration Infernalis to Jewel, is my bench relevant?

We had several metadata caching improvements in ceph-fuse recently which I think went in after Infernalis. That could explain it. -Greg On Monday, June 6, 2016, Francois Lafont wrote: > Hi, > > I have a little Ceph cluster in production with 5 cluster nodes and 2 > client

[ceph-users] ceph-fuse, fio largely better after migration Infernalis to Jewel, is my bench relevant?

Hi, I have a little Ceph cluster in production with 5 cluster nodes and 2 client nodes. The clients are using cephfs via fuse.ceph. Recently, I have upgraded my cluster from Infernalis to Jewel (servers _and_ clients). When the cluster was in Infernalis version the fio command below gave me