On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 10:53:50 +0200 Alwin Antreich wrote:
>
> On 04/12/2016 01:48 AM, Christian Balzer wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 09:25:35 -0400 (EDT) Jason Dillaman wrote:
> >
> > > In general, RBD "fancy" striping can help under certain workloads
> > > where small IO would normally be hittin
On 04/12/2016 01:48 AM, Christian Balzer wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 09:25:35 -0400 (EDT) Jason Dillaman wrote:
>
> > In general, RBD "fancy" striping can help under certain workloads where
> > small IO would normally be hitting the same object (e.g. small
> > sequential IO).
> >
>
> While the ab
On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 09:25:35 -0400 (EDT) Jason Dillaman wrote:
> In general, RBD "fancy" striping can help under certain workloads where
> small IO would normally be hitting the same object (e.g. small
> sequential IO).
>
While the above is very true (especially for single/few clients), I never
nt: Thursday, April 7, 2016 2:48:45 PM
> Subject: [ceph-users] ceph striping
>
> Hi All,
>
> first I wanted to say hello, as I am new to the list.
>
> Secondly, we want to use ceph for VM disks and cephfs for our source
> code, image data, login directories, etc.
Hi All,
first I wanted to say hello, as I am new to the list.
Secondly, we want to use ceph for VM disks and cephfs for our source
code, image data, login directories, etc.
I would like to know, if striping would improve performance if we would
set something like the following and move away from
