On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 12:52 AM, Jens-U. Mozdzen wrote:
> Hi Yan,
>
> Zitat von "Yan, Zheng" :
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> It's likely some clients had caps on unlinked inodes, which prevent
>> MDS from purging objects. When a file gets deleted, mds notifies all
>> clients, clients are supposed to drop cor
Hi Yan,
Zitat von "Yan, Zheng" :
[...]
It's likely some clients had caps on unlinked inodes, which prevent
MDS from purging objects. When a file gets deleted, mds notifies all
clients, clients are supposed to drop corresponding caps if possible.
You may hit a bug in this area, some clients fail
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 10:11 PM, Jens-U. Mozdzen wrote:
> Hi *,
>
> during the last weeks, we noticed some strange behavior of our CephFS data
> pool (not metadata). As things have worked out over time, I'm just asking
> here so that I can better understand what to look out for in the future.
>
>
Hi Webert,
Zitat von Webert de Souza Lima :
I have experienced delayed free in used space before, in Jewel, but that
just stopped happening with no intervention.
thank you for letting me know.
If none of the developers remembers fixing this issue, it might be a
still pending problem.
Bac
Hi John,
Zitat von John Spray :
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Jens-U. Mozdzen wrote:
[...]
Then we had one of the nodes crash for a lack of memory (MDS was > 12 GB,
plus the new Bluestore OSD and probably the 12.2.1 BlueStore memory leak).
We brought the node back online and at first had M
I have experienced delayed free in used space before, in Jewel, but that
just stopped happening with no intervention.
Back then, umounting all client's fs would make it free the space rapidly.
I don't know if that's related.
Regards,
Webert Lima
DevOps Engineer at MAV Tecnologia
*Belo Horizonte
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Jens-U. Mozdzen wrote:
> Hi *,
>
> during the last weeks, we noticed some strange behavior of our CephFS data
> pool (not metadata). As things have worked out over time, I'm just asking
> here so that I can better understand what to look out for in the future.
>
>
Hi *,
during the last weeks, we noticed some strange behavior of our CephFS
data pool (not metadata). As things have worked out over time, I'm
just asking here so that I can better understand what to look out for
in the future.
This is on a three-node Ceph Luminous (12.2.1) cluster with o
