On 2017-06-30T16:48:04, Sage Weil wrote:
> > Simply disabling the tests while keeping the code in the distribution is
> > setting up users who happen to be using Btrfs for failure.
>
> I don't think we can wait *another* cycle (year) to stop testing this.
>
> We can, however,
>
> - prominentl
Le 04/07/2017 à 19:00, Jack a écrit :
> You may just upgrade to Luminous, then replace filestore by bluestore
You don't just "replace" filestore by bluestore on a production cluster
: you transition over several weeks/months from the first to the second.
The two must be rock stable and have predic
You may just upgrade to Luminous, then replace filestore by bluestore
Don't be scared, as Sage said:
> The only good(ish) news is that we aren't touching FileStore if we can
> help it, so it less likely to regress than other things. And we'll
> continue testing filestore+btrfs on jewel for some
Le 30/06/2017 à 18:48, Sage Weil a écrit :
> On Fri, 30 Jun 2017, Lenz Grimmer wrote:
>> Hi Sage,
>>
>> On 06/30/2017 05:21 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
>>
>>> The easiest thing is to
>>>
>>> 1/ Stop testing filestore+btrfs for luminous onward. We've recommended
>>> against btrfs for a long time and are
Hi Sage,
On 06/30/2017 06:48 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
> Ah, crap. This is what happens when devs don't read their own
> documetnation. I recommend against btrfs every time it ever comes
> up, the downstream distributions all support only xfs, but yes, it
> looks like the docs never got updated...
> Op 30 juni 2017 om 18:48 schreef Sage Weil :
>
>
> On Fri, 30 Jun 2017, Lenz Grimmer wrote:
> > Hi Sage,
> >
> > On 06/30/2017 05:21 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
> >
> > > The easiest thing is to
> > >
> > > 1/ Stop testing filestore+btrfs for luminous onward. We've recommended
> > > against btrf
On 30/06/2017 18:48, Sage Weil wrote:
> We can, however,
>
> - prominently feature this in the luminous release notes, and
> - require the 'enable experimental unrecoverable data corrupting features =
> btrfs' in order to use it, so that users are explicitly opting in to
> luminous+btrfs territ
On Fri, 30 Jun 2017, Lenz Grimmer wrote:
> Hi Sage,
>
> On 06/30/2017 05:21 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
>
> > The easiest thing is to
> >
> > 1/ Stop testing filestore+btrfs for luminous onward. We've recommended
> > against btrfs for a long time and are moving toward bluestore anyway.
>
> Searching
On Fri, 30 Jun 2017 16:29:43 + David Turner wrote:
> I actually don't see either of these as issues with just flat out saying
> that Btrfs will not be supported in Luminous. It's a full new release and
> it sounds like it is no longer a relevant Filestore backend in Luminous.
> People can eit
I actually don't see either of these as issues with just flat out saying
that Btrfs will not be supported in Luminous. It's a full new release and
it sounds like it is no longer a relevant Filestore backend in Luminous.
People can either plan to migrate their OSDs to Bluestore once they reach
Lumi
On Fri, 30 Jun 2017, Lenz Grimmer said:
> > 1/ Stop testing filestore+btrfs for luminous onward. We've recommended
> > against btrfs for a long time and are moving toward bluestore anyway.
>
> Searching the documentation for "btrfs" does not really give a user any
> clue that the use of Btrfs is
Hi Sage,
On 06/30/2017 05:21 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
> The easiest thing is to
>
> 1/ Stop testing filestore+btrfs for luminous onward. We've recommended
> against btrfs for a long time and are moving toward bluestore anyway.
Searching the documentation for "btrfs" does not really give a user an
On 06/30/17 05:21, Sage Weil wrote:
> We're having a series of problems with the valgrind included in xenial[1]
> that have led us to restrict all valgrind tests to centos nodes. At teh
> same time, we're also seeing spurious ENOSPC errors from btrfs on both
> centos on xenial kernels[2], makin
We're having a series of problems with the valgrind included in xenial[1]
that have led us to restrict all valgrind tests to centos nodes. At teh
same time, we're also seeing spurious ENOSPC errors from btrfs on both
centos on xenial kernels[2], making trusty the only distro where btrfs
works
14 matches
Mail list logo
