A more common search term for this might be Rack failure domain. The
premise is the same for room as it is for rack, both can hold hosts and be
set as the failure domain. There is a fair bit of discussion on how to
achieve multi-rack/room/datacenter setups. Datacenter setups are more
likely to h
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 3:02 AM Zoran Bošnjak <
zoran.bosn...@sloveniacontrol.si> wrote:
> I am aware of monitor consensus requirement. It is taken care of (there is
> a third room with only monitor node). My problem is about OSD redundancy,
> since I can only use 2 server rooms for OSDs.
>
> I co
I am aware of monitor consensus requirement. It is taken care of (there is a
third room with only monitor node). My problem is about OSD redundancy, since I
can only use 2 server rooms for OSDs.
I could use EC-pools, lrc or any other ceph configuration. But I could not find
a configuration that
> Is it possible to configure crush map such that it will tolerate "room"
> failure? In my case, there is one
> network switch per room and one power supply per room, which makes a single
> point of (room) failure.
Hi,
You cannot achieve real room redundancy with just two rooms. At minimum you'
This is my planned OSD configuration:
root
room1
OSD host1
OSD host2
room2
OSD host3
OSD host4
There are 6 OSDs per host.
Is it possible to configure crush map such that it will tolerate "room"
failure? In my case, there is one network switch per room and
