On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 5:44 AM, George Mihaiescu wrote:
> Hi Yehuda,
>
> I've ran the "radosgw-admin orphans find" command again, but captured its
> output this time.
>
> There are both "shadow" files and "multipart" files detected as leaked.
>
> leaked:
>
Hi Yehuda,
I've ran the "radosgw-admin orphans find" command again, but captured its
output this time.
There are both "shadow" files and "multipart" files detected as leaked.
leaked:
default.34461213.1__multipart_data/d2a14aeb-a384-51b1-8704-fe76a9a6f5f5.-j0vqDrC0wr44bii2ytrtpcrlnspSyE.44
oid is object id. The orphan find command generates a list of objects
that needs to be removed at the end of the run (if finishes
successfully). If you didn't catch that, you should be able to still
run the same scan (using the same scan id) and retrieve that info
again.
Yehuda
On Fri, Feb 24,
Hi Yehuda,
Thank you for the quick reply.
What is the you're referring to that I should backup and then delete?
I extracted the files from the ".log" pool where the "orphan find" tool
stored the results, but they are zero bytes files.
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Feb 24 12:45
Hi,
we wanted to have more confidence in the orphans search tool before
providing a functionality that actually remove the objects. One thing
that you can do is create a new pool, copy these objects to the new
pool (as a backup, rados -p --target-pool=
cp ), and remove these objects (rados -p
Hi,
I updated http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/18331 with my own issue, and I am
hoping Orit or Yehuda could give their opinion on what to do next.
What was the purpose of the "orphan find" tool and how to actually clean up
these files?
Thank you,
George
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 2:22 PM, Wido den
> Op 24 december 2016 om 13:47 schreef Wido den Hollander :
>
>
>
> > Op 23 december 2016 om 16:05 schreef Wido den Hollander :
> >
> >
> >
> > > Op 22 december 2016 om 19:00 schreef Orit Wasserman :
> > >
> > >
> > > HI Maruis,
> > >
>
On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
> > Op 23 december 2016 om 16:05 schreef Wido den Hollander :
> >
> >
> >
> > > Op 22 december 2016 om 19:00 schreef Orit Wasserman <
> owass...@redhat.com>:
> > >
> > >
> > > HI Maruis,
> > >
> > > On
> Op 23 december 2016 om 16:05 schreef Wido den Hollander :
>
>
>
> > Op 22 december 2016 om 19:00 schreef Orit Wasserman :
> >
> >
> > HI Maruis,
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Marius Vaitiekunas
> > wrote:
> > >
> Op 22 december 2016 om 19:00 schreef Orit Wasserman :
>
>
> HI Maruis,
>
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Marius Vaitiekunas
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Marius Vaitiekunas
> > wrote:
> >>
>
HI Maruis,
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Marius Vaitiekunas
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Marius Vaitiekunas
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> 1) I've written before into mailing list, but one more time. We have big
>> issues
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Marius Vaitiekunas <
mariusvaitieku...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 1) I've written before into mailing list, but one more time. We have big
> issues recently with rgw on jewel. because of leaked data - the rate is
> about 50GB/hour.
>
> We've hitted these bugs:
>
Hi,
1) I've written before into mailing list, but one more time. We have big
issues recently with rgw on jewel. because of leaked data - the rate is
about 50GB/hour.
We've hitted these bugs:
rgw: fix put_acls for objects starting and ending with underscore (
issue#17625
13 matches
Mail list logo