I can confirm, we used to run all our nodes on btrfs and I cannot recommend
anyone of doing that at this time. We had problems with deadlocks and very
slow performance and even corruption over time all the way up to kernel
3.13, I haven't tried 3.14 but there's some patches mentioning performance
a
On 05/28/2014 09:19 AM, Cedric Lemarchand wrote:
Le 28/05/2014 16:15, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG a écrit :
Am 28.05.2014 16:13, schrieb Wido den Hollander:
On 05/28/2014 04:11 PM, VELARTIS Philipp Dürhammer wrote:
Is someone using btrfs in production?
I know people say it’s still not stable
On 5/28/14 07:19 , Cedric Lemarchand wrote:
Le 28/05/2014 16:15, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG a écrit :
Am 28.05.2014 16:13, schrieb Wido den Hollander:
On 05/28/2014 04:11 PM, VELARTIS Philipp Dürhammer wrote:
Is someone using btrfs in production?
I know people say it’s still not stable. But
Le 28/05/2014 16:15, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG a écrit :
> Am 28.05.2014 16:13, schrieb Wido den Hollander:
>> On 05/28/2014 04:11 PM, VELARTIS Philipp Dürhammer wrote:
>>> Is someone using btrfs in production?
>>> I know people say it’s still not stable. But do we use so many features
>>> with
Am 28.05.2014 16:13, schrieb Wido den Hollander:
> On 05/28/2014 04:11 PM, VELARTIS Philipp Dürhammer wrote:
>> Is someone using btrfs in production?
>> I know people say it’s still not stable. But do we use so many features
>> with ceph? And facebook uses it also in production. Would be a big spee
On 05/28/2014 04:11 PM, VELARTIS Philipp Dürhammer wrote:
Is someone using btrfs in production?
I know people say it’s still not stable. But do we use so many features
with ceph? And facebook uses it also in production. Would be a big speed
gain.
As far as I know the main problem is still perfo
Is someone using btrfs in production?
I know people say it's still not stable. But do we use so many features with
ceph? And facebook uses it also in production. Would be a big speed gain.
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://li