Hello Chad,
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Chad William Seys
wrote:
> Thanks John! I see that a pool can have more than one "application". Should
> I feel free to combine uses (e.g. cephfs,rbd) or is this counterindicated?
That's not currently possible but we are thinking about changes which
Thanks John! I see that a pool can have more than one "application".
Should I feel free to combine uses (e.g. cephfs,rbd) or is this
counterindicated?
Thanks!
Chad.
Just to stern this up a bit...
In the future, you may find that things stop working if you remove the
application tags.
For e
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 5:28 PM, Chad William Seys
wrote:
> Scrolled down a bit and found this blog post:
> https://ceph.com/community/new-luminous-pool-tags/
>
> If things haven't changed:
>
>>Could someone tell me / link to what associating a ceph pool to an
>> application does?
>
>
> ATM it'
Scrolled down a bit and found this blog post:
https://ceph.com/community/new-luminous-pool-tags/
If things haven't changed:
Could someone tell me / link to what associating a ceph pool to an
application does?
ATM it's a tag and does nothing to the pool/PG/etc structure
I hope this info
Hi All,
Could someone tell me / link to what associating a ceph pool to an
application does?
I hope this info includes why "Disabling an application within a pool
might result in loss of application functionality" when running 'ceph
osd application disable '
Thanks!
Chad.
___