I just noticed that this went to cerowrt-users. There aren't a whole
lot of people on that list and this stuff is in heavy development so,
forwarding the thread here
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Dave Taht wrote:
> Radvd is going away in the BB ("barrier breaker" - openwrt head)
> version
I just noticed this thread went over to cerowrt-users and
cerowrt-devel is the right place to discuss these issues.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Steven Barth
Date: Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 9:38 AM
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-users] IPv6 router advertisements on custom interfaces
To: cerowr
-- Forwarded message --
From: Steven Barth
Date: Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 9:38 AM
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-users] IPv6 router advertisements on custom interfaces
To: cerowrt-users
Fyi I've commited a new ipv6-support version to OpenWrt yesterday.
This includes (partly untested) all fea
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Dave Taht wrote:
> I just noticed this thread went over to cerowrt-users and
> cerowrt-devel is the right place to discuss these issues.
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Steven Barth
> Date: Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 9:38 AM
> Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Steven Barth wrote:
> On 10.12.2012 10:15, Dave Taht wrote:
>>>
>>> * Prefixes are automatically split up and distributed over
>>> downstream-interfaces OR by choice mapped to an ULA-address (NPT66).
>>
>>
>> Hmm. The homenet folk have a prefix assignment and rout
On 10.12.2012 12:40, Dave Taht wrote:
Well, I abhor bridging 2.4 and 5 ghz wireless together, and then there
is the ever more popular concept of a "guest" network...
Yes I'm talking about the default setup of OpenWrt here which does not
have a guest-interface etc. though I agree in general we
On 10 December 2012 08:38, Steven Barth wrote:
>
> So far the current IPv6-featureset is:
>
> * Support for native IPv6 with static configuration
> * Support for native IPv6 with DHCPv6-Prefix Delegation
> * Support for native IPv6 without PD via relaying or masquerading
> * Support for 6in4, 6to
> "Dave" == Dave Taht writes:
Dave> I worry about encapsulating protocols copying the inner TOS/Diffserv
Dave> bits to the outer IP header. Using a shaper that is aware of these
Dave> bits would end up delivering packets that depend on a sequential
Dave> encrypted stream out o
I haven't seen the 3800 in any store for months. It's not at
frys...there are only two available via amazon...
too bad, we're almost done debloating it, with just the wifi left to go.
I've been dreading this... I know there are tons of other routers on
the market with this chipset, but I imagine
Do we know what chip the 4300 (that Amazon is suggesting instead) is using?
Bill Katsak
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 10, 2012, at 2:11 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
> I haven't seen the 3800 in any store for months. It's not at
> frys...there are only two available via amazon...
>
> too bad, we're almost
> Do we know what chip the 4300 (that Amazon is suggesting instead) is using?
http://www.wikidevi.com/wiki/Netgear_WNDR4300
CPU1: Atheros AR9344 (560 MHz)
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 9:02 PM, William Katsak wrote:
> Do we know what chip the 4300 (that Amazon is suggesting instead) is using?
>
> B
On 10.12.2012 10:15, Dave Taht wrote:
* Prefixes are automatically split up and distributed over
downstream-interfaces OR by choice mapped to an ULA-address (NPT66).
Hmm. The homenet folk have a prefix assignment and router discovery
process defined in their PD over ospf (somewhat crazy)
implem
12 matches
Mail list logo
