On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 2:27 AM, David Lang wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Dec 2012, Richard Brown wrote:
>
>> The wndr3700v4 is out, and appears to be a good hardware upgrade from
>> the 3800 series, but it's not supported by openwrt yet.
>>
>> I took a look at their GPL source distribution. And yea! it's o
Does anyone happen to know exactly what (Chinese) shop does the software for
Netgear? I bet Atheros/Qualcomm have a favorite outsourcing partner.
It is quite interesting that it is OpenWRT-based. The reason I mention this
is that one goal is to get all the goodies adopted in the commercial
On Sun, 23 Dec 2012, Dave Taht wrote:
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 2:27 AM, David Lang wrote:
On Thu, 20 Dec 2012, Richard Brown wrote:
The wndr3700v4 is out, and appears to be a good hardware upgrade from
the 3800 series, but it's not supported by openwrt yet.
I took a look at their GPL source
Ubiquiti has quite a list of products that could be good candidates for
debloating, as they all already run OpenWRT
and are based on the atheros soc and put out some decent watts
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 10:16 AM, David Lang wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Dec 2012, Dave Taht wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 23, 201
I'm actually looking for low power devices, I need to put a lot of them in a
small area, so I'll be turning the power down about as far as it will go.
I'll look over their devices
David Lang
On Sun, 23 Dec 2012, Outback Dingo wrote:
Ubiquiti has quite a list of products that could be good ca
As is probably not widely known, I already fairly regularly do a build
for two of ubiquity's products which use the same chipset as cerowrt.
https://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/cerowrt/wiki/Yurtlab
This is a highly specialized build to make it easy to deploy new
versions to the boxes in place th
In looking at their products, they seem to have almost nothing that's dual band,
am I missing something?
David Lang
On Sun, 23 Dec 2012, Dave Taht wrote:
I wouldn't mind adding explicit support for ubiquity's in-home product
to cerowrt.
___
Cerowrt
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 11:14 AM, David Lang wrote:
> In looking at their products, they seem to have almost nothing that's dual
> band, am I missing something?
Nope. I went single channel for the yurtlab backbone in part because I
wanted "hardware flow control" (the 100Mbit ethernet connected to
On Sun, 23 Dec 2012, Dave Taht wrote:
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 11:14 AM, David Lang wrote:
In looking at their products, they seem to have almost nothing that's dual
band, am I missing something?
Nope. I went single channel for the yurtlab backbone in part because I
wanted "hardware flow cont
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 11:57 AM, David Lang wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Dec 2012, Dave Taht wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 11:14 AM, David Lang wrote:
>>>
>>> In looking at their products, they seem to have almost nothing that's
>>> dual
>>> band, am I missing something?
>>
>>
>> Nope. I went singl
> * small DHCP-PD support
>
> Wide is not working out, isc and dibbler are too huge. It's time for
> someone to write a small one... (not me!)
https://github.com/sbyx/odhcp6c
odhcp6c - Embedded DHCPv6 Client
** Abstract **
odhcp6c is a minimalistic DHCPv6 client for use in embedded Linux syste
Oops... forgot the link.
http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero2/cerowrt/3.6/wndr/3.6.11-2/
Back to the eggnog, for me, I guess.
___
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
Oh, and optionally available and installable via opkg is are the "THC"
ipv6 test tools
(talked about here: http://www.thc.org/thc-ipv6/ )
Now you too can share my nightmares about making ipv6 universally available.
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
> Oops... forgot the link.
>
>
Hi,
just for you testers testing the latest bleeding edge in OpenWrt /
CeroWrt ipv6-support.
Documentation of the new functionality:
http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/uci/network6
For the extra brave who want to enable dnsmasq-support (requires version
2.66 which is not stable yet).
Put this int
Fantastic! I'll test the build with a upnp client and an ssdp device mid
next week.
Happy holidays!
Maciej
On 23 Dec 2012 21:08, "Dave Taht" wrote:
> I am not in a position to test this release at all - I gave my last
> wndr3800s to a deserving student in Paris, and the only other ones I
> have
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Maciej Soltysiak wrote:
> Fantastic! I'll test the build with a upnp client and an ssdp device mid
> next week.
I'd appreciate some confirmation that it actually booted from someone.
I just tried to update the only machine in the yurtlab I dared
reinstall remotely
16 matches
Mail list logo
