Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [aqm] ping loss considered harmful

2015-03-03 Thread Fred Baker (fred)
On Mar 1, 2015, at 7:57 PM, Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote: How can we fix this user perception, short of re-prioritizing ping in sqm-scripts? IMHO, ping should go at the same priority as general traffic - the default class, DSCP=0. When I send one, I am asking whether a random packet

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [aqm] [Bloat] ping loss considered harmful

2015-03-03 Thread Fred Baker (fred)
On Mar 3, 2015, at 9:29 AM, Wesley Eddy w...@mti-systems.com wrote: On 3/3/2015 12:20 PM, Fred Baker (fred) wrote: On Mar 1, 2015, at 7:57 PM, Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com mailto:dave.t...@gmail.com wrote: How can we fix this user perception, short of re-prioritizing ping in

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [sqm-scripts] not started at boot?

2015-03-03 Thread Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Alan Jenkins alan.christopher.jenk...@gmail.com writes: The scripts work for reboot manual ifdown/ifup. So I'd love to see this fix in openwrt CC. It's been pushed to the CC packages git repo, so should show up there after the next build cycle :) -Toke

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] A simple poll

2015-03-03 Thread Rich Brown
On Feb 28, 2015, at 12:02 PM, Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote: A) What do you like about cerowrt? - It just works - It gives me a lot of cool features that I rely on (no bufferbloat, IPv6, routing on interfaces) and some that I don't (DNSSEC, babel) - Pride in my (small) contribution to

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [sqm-scripts] not started at boot?

2015-03-03 Thread Alan Jenkins
On 3 March 2015 at 17:06, Sebastian Moeller moell...@gmx.de wrote: Hi Alan, I would be delighted if you could try the etc/hotplug.d/iface/11-sqm and the updated usr/lib/sqm/run.sh from the attached files (I am not sure about the root to the files in the attached folder, but you will figure

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [sqm-scripts] not started at boot?

2015-03-03 Thread Alan Jenkins
On 03/03/2015, Sebastian Moeller moell...@gmx.de wrote: Hi Alan, Excellent, now we have positive results from CC (you are running CC I believe) and cerowrt. I'm afraid I'm running BB with this package manually installed. It still logs errors. In the boot log? I tend to

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [sqm-scripts] not started at boot?

2015-03-03 Thread Sebastian Moeller
Hallo Alan, On Mar 3, 2015, at 23:39 , Alan Jenkins alan.christopher.jenk...@gmail.com wrote: On 03/03/2015, Sebastian Moeller moell...@gmx.de wrote: Hi Alan, Excellent, now we have positive results from CC (you are running CC I believe) and cerowrt. I'm afraid I'm running BB with

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [aqm] [Bloat] ping loss considered harmful

2015-03-03 Thread Dave Taht
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Fred Baker (fred) f...@cisco.com wrote: On Mar 3, 2015, at 9:29 AM, Wesley Eddy w...@mti-systems.com wrote: On 3/3/2015 12:20 PM, Fred Baker (fred) wrote: On Mar 1, 2015, at 7:57 PM, Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com mailto:dave.t...@gmail.com wrote: How can

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] [aqm] ping loss considered harmful

2015-03-03 Thread Wesley Eddy
On 3/3/2015 12:20 PM, Fred Baker (fred) wrote: On Mar 1, 2015, at 7:57 PM, Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com mailto:dave.t...@gmail.com wrote: How can we fix this user perception, short of re-prioritizing ping in sqm-scripts? IMHO, ping should go at the same priority as general traffic - the

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [homenet] Routing protocol comparison document

2015-03-03 Thread JF Tremblay
On Mar 2, 2015, at 2:45 PM, Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote: I currently plan to enable some form of ipv6 translation by default in the next version of cerowrt - and make direct access optional - (or the reverse! I'm easy ) if somehow we get it together enough to actually have a way to