this thread was quite interesting on high density wifi deployments
http://seclists.org/nanog/2015/Jun/1006
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jeremy Bresley
Date: Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 9:53 PM
Subject: Re: Whats' a good product for a high-density Wireless network setup?
To: na...@nanog
huh? I pulled from the repo you were committing to, I thought is
that not correct?
I can do a build of a newer cake... before I get on the plane...
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 5:46 AM, Jonathan Morton wrote:
> It looks like your cake is new enough to support set associative hashing,
> but not th
It looks like your cake is new enough to support set associative hashing,
but not the new overhead handling. The ATM flag was put in a long time ago.
Looking at the code which grabs those options (cake_change), there doesn't
seem to be a way to detect whether an unsupported option was provided by
On 20/06/15 12:00, Jonathan Morton wrote:
I can probably glean more information from "tc -s qdisc".
However, my hypothesis is still that the version of cake you have is
old, while the version of tc that you have is newer.
- Jonathan Morton
Hi
I missed that, thanks. (Error checking in qd
I can probably glean more information from "tc -s qdisc".
However, my hypothesis is still that the version of cake you have is old,
while the version of tc that you have is newer.
- Jonathan Morton
___
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
Cerowrt-devel@lists.buff
On 19/06/2015, Dave Taht wrote:
> Fresh bits! Get your fresh bits here! (totally untested)
>
> http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero3/lupin/ar71xx/
Good news: it lives! Yum, fresh bits.
So now I can update and install packages. Including tc-adv. It looks
like it was overriding tc already th
