> On Mar 3, 2015, at 9:29 AM, Wesley Eddy wrote:
>
> On 3/3/2015 12:20 PM, Fred Baker (fred) wrote:
>>
>>> On Mar 1, 2015, at 7:57 PM, Dave Taht >> <mailto:dave.t...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> How can we fix this user perception, shor
> On Mar 1, 2015, at 7:57 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
>
> How can we fix this user perception, short of re-prioritizing ping in
> sqm-scripts?
IMHO, ping should go at the same priority as general traffic - the default
class, DSCP=0. When I send one, I am asking whether a random packet can get to
a g
On Jul 1, 2014, at 1:37 AM, Dave Taht wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Fred Baker (fred) wrote:
>> There is in fact a backbone. Once upon a time, it was run by a single
>> company, BBN. Then it was more like five, and then ... and now it’s 169.
>> There are, if
On Jun 27, 2014, at 9:58 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
> One of the points in the wired article that kicked this thread off was
> this picture of what the internet is starting to look like:
>
> http://www.wired.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/net_neutral.jpg.jpeg
>
> I don't want it to look like that.
On Apr 29, 2014, at 3:08 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Apr 2014, Dave Taht wrote:
>
>> pretty wonderful experiment and video http://livingwithlag.com/
>
> Just so that everybody realises that this is an advertisement.
>
> Also, what access method has 300 ms access latency, let al
