On 7/10/2015 1:01 AM, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
...
> You can flash back the factory firmware without serial, you just use
> sysupgrade with the Linksys factory image.
How does that differ from mtd, e.g., as indicated here (which doesn't
mention sysinstall)?:
...
>> Can you
> On Jul 10, 2015, at 12:03 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 7 Jul 2015, Joe Touch wrote:
>>
>> Some questions:
>>
>>> On 7/6/2015 11:16 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>>> ...
>>> You can flash back the factory firmware wit
Hi, Sebastian,
On 7/8/2015 1:15 PM, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> On Jul 8, 2015, at 20:37 , Joe Touch wrote:
...
>> The other step, IMO, would be two flags in the OpenWRT list of hardware:
>>
>> - a flag/color that indicates that the most recent hardw
Hi, Matt,
On 7/7/2015 11:19 AM, Matt Taggart wrote:...
> This message made me realize I hadn't posted the CC+SQM HOWTO I
> wrote, maybe it will be useful,
>
> https://we.riseup.net/lackof/openwrt
FWIW, this is a big step in the direction I was suggesting.
Thanks!
The other step, IMO, would be t
Some questions:
On 7/6/2015 11:16 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
...
> You can flash back the factory firmware without serial, you just use
> sysupgrade with the Linksys factory image.
How does that differ from mtd, e.g., as indicated here (which doesn't
mention sysinstall)?:
http://wiki.openwrt.
- make a short-list of a few currently available routers
for which an integrated build exists *for the most recent
motherboard version*
All of this could be done on the CeroWRT site until it can be put on
OpenWRT.
These are fairly direct ways to lower the bar, which seems unn
Hi, all,
I'm posting because of my recent frustration with the claim that
bufferbloat solutions have been "pushed up into the OpenWRT and
commercial routers.
I spent the bulk of last weekend trying to find a COTS WIFI router that
supported OpenWRT with bufferbloat (SQM) extensions.
I tried a Lin
On 3/2/2015 3:14 PM, David Lang wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Mar 2015, Joe Touch wrote:
>
>> On 3/2/2015 1:40 AM, Brian Trammell wrote:
>> ...
>>> The real solution is to create a utility called "ping" that uses
>>> traffic that gets prioritized the same wa
On 3/2/2015 1:40 AM, Brian Trammell wrote:
...
> The real solution is to create a utility called "ping" that uses
> traffic that gets prioritized the same way as the traffic you care
> about instead of ICMP echo request/reply. Users don't care about
> the packets on the wire so much as they do t
