Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"

On 3/3/2015 12:20 PM, Fred Baker (fred) wrote: > >> On Mar 1, 2015, at 7:57 PM, Dave Taht > > wrote: >> >> How can we fix this user perception, short of re-prioritizing ping in >> sqm-scripts? > > IMHO, ping should go at the same priority as general traffic - the > def

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] some good bloat related stuff on the ICCRG agenda, IETF #86 Tuesday, March 12 2013, 13:00-15:00, room Caribbean 6

On 2/28/2013 2:55 PM, Matt Mathis wrote: > Two of the tests in my model based metrics draft (for IPPM) are for > AQM (like) tests. One we have pretty good theory for (preventing > standing queues in congestion avoidance) and the other we don't > (exiting from slowstart at a reasonable window). >

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] some good bloat related stuff on the ICCRG agenda, IETF #86 Tuesday, March 12 2013, 13:00-15:00, room Caribbean 6

On 2/28/2013 10:53 AM, Dave Taht wrote: > > For those that don't attend ietf meetings in person, there is usually > live audio and jabber chat hooked up into the presentations. > > See y'all there, next month, in one form or another. > In the TSVAREA meeting, we've also set aside some time to

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Codel] [Bloat] RFC: Realtime Response Under Load (rrul) test specification

On 11/6/2012 8:56 AM, Dave Taht wrote: > On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh > wrote: >> On Tue, 06 Nov 2012, Dave Taht wrote: >>> I have been working on developing a specification for testing networks >>> more effectively for various side effects of bufferbloat, notably >>