Alright thanks, I'll run some more tests tonight after other people are
done using the connection.
Regarding your other questions:
Yes, the machine I am using to test is wired to the Atom via a small
netgear managed switch.
The only thing that is running on this Atom box is routing, iptables
kill offloads.
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Aaron Wood wrote:
> Bill,
>
> I'd recommend setting the bandwidth values low (very low) at first, just to
> establish that the setup is working correctly. I'm able to get better
> control of latency at those bitrates on an WNDR3800:
>
> http://burn
Bill,
I'd recommend setting the bandwidth values low (very low) at first, just to
establish that the setup is working correctly. I'm able to get better
control of latency at those bitrates on an WNDR3800:
http://burntchrome.blogspot.com/2014/05/fixing-bufferbloat-on-comcasts-blast.html
I'd star
Dave,
Thanks for the reply. I should have made it clearer that I am not
running this on a Netgear 3800, I am running the sqm system on an Atom
D510 box at 1.66 GHz (two cores + hyperthreads) with 2 GB RAM and good
Intel NICs. While running the rrul, the CPU is barely breaking a sweat.
The OS
well, cerowrt's inbound shaper runs out of cpu at +60mbits. That is
possibly part of your problem.
the peaks you are seeing are not bad - but to me, probably indicative
of running out of cpu, which will among other things, drop packets
burstily.
As comcast has rolled out 100mbit+ service in a ton
