[ GoGo does not need to run “Man in the Middle Attacks” on YouTube ](
http://www.reed.com/blog-dpr/?p=174 )___
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 9:26 AM, wrote:
> GoGo does not need to run “Man in the Middle Attacks” on YouTube
re: http://www.reed.com/blog-dpr/?p=174
I amplified via g+ and mentioned to slashdot.
(http://slashdot.org/submission/4107907/gogo-airline-network-blocks-youtube-when-they-could-just-fix-th
On Tue, 6 Jan 2015, Dave Taht wrote:
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 9:26 AM, wrote:
GoGo does not need to run “Man in the Middle Attacks” on YouTube
re: http://www.reed.com/blog-dpr/?p=174
I amplified via g+ and mentioned to slashdot.
(http://slashdot.org/submission/4107907/gogo-airline-network-bl
One note: on my flight to Hawaii for the IETF, I tried running
netperf-wrapper to see just how bloated the airplane system was (I presume
it was GoGo, but don't know for sure: I was on United).
On my second attempt to run the test, the on board system crashed
entirely. I did not try again.
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Dave Taht wrote:
>
> I also tend to wish that streaming video had got it's own control port
> rather than being layered over 80 and 443.
>
In my experience, that was due to the corporate firewalls' default rule of
disallowing outbound connections. Port 80 can be
