Re: [Cerowrt-devel] smart queue management conflict

2021-03-22 Thread Valdis Klētnieks
On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 20:50:50 -0400, "David P. Reed" said: > Let's say I have a sensor on my dog's collar, or on a fork lift in a > warehouse? Do these researchers honestly think that each sensor will make a > *phone call* over the LTE fabric and continue that phone call for all the time > the devic

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] smart queue management conflict

2021-03-22 Thread David P. Reed
I know I am seen as too outspoken on these things, but this paper was frank nonsense! I mean, starting from the idea that sensor and actuator devices use a small bit rate averaged over a 24 hour period means that they should be assigned a "narrowband channel" (which would be fine if real sensor

[Cerowrt-devel] smart queue management conflict

2021-03-21 Thread Dave Taht
see: https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/8/2324 I do kind of wish the authors hadn't overloaded our term "smart queue management" (SQM) with their interpretation in "End-to-End QoS “Smart Queue” Management" ( https://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/cerowrt/wiki/Smart_Queue_Management/ ) It's not trad