Re: Catholic Church no longer swears by truth of the Bible

2005-10-09 Thread Dana
I know I was taught that Genesis was literally true. On 10/9/05, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well, not always. Talk to Gallileo. Or anyone touched by the > Inquisition. The church has gotten better, but I think they still have > a ways to go. > > What has changed is what parts are

Re: Catholic Church no longer swears by truth of the Bible

2005-10-09 Thread Jerry Johnson
Well, not always. Talk to Gallileo. Or anyone touched by the Inquisition. The church has gotten better, but I think they still have a ways to go. What has changed is what parts are open for interpretation and non-literal reflection. I have been a little concerned since the new Pope was put into p

Re: Catholic Church no longer swears by truth of the Bible

2005-10-09 Thread Larry C. Lyons
Its been like that since the middle ages. Even St. Augustine railed against biblical literalism. The church has always said that parts are allegorical. larry On 10/9/05, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Saw this on the arch-l mailing list, and thought it worth passing along. > > http://

Re: Catholic Church no longer swears by truth of the Bible

2005-10-09 Thread Dana
that's very interesting. And somewhat encouraging. Dana On 10/9/05, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Saw this on the arch-l mailing list, and thought it worth passing along. > > http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,13509-1811332,00.html > > Catholic Church no longer swears by trut

Catholic Church no longer swears by truth of the Bible

2005-10-09 Thread Jerry Johnson
Saw this on the arch-l mailing list, and thought it worth passing along. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,13509-1811332,00.html Catholic Church no longer swears by truth of the Bible THE hierarchy of the Roman Catholic Church has published a teaching document instructing the faithful that

Re: 3200+ Miles in ONE WEEK!

2005-10-09 Thread DRE
Go here. I've always wanted to go myself. DRE http://www.silversprings.com/ On 10/8/05, Erika L. Walker-Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've been trying to tell him this > > > > ##| > ##| Sounds like you need to invest in a digital camera, take > ##| pics of your > ##| travels, and wh

Re: Great Political Summary

2005-10-09 Thread Dana
ya, that is the problem with that model all right. On 10/9/05, Larry C. Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > many times wise old kings are succeeded by young stupid ones. > > larry > > On 10/9/05, brobborb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sometimes i like to think of an old and wise king who looked

Re: Great Political Summary

2005-10-09 Thread Larry C. Lyons
many times wise old kings are succeeded by young stupid ones. larry On 10/9/05, brobborb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sometimes i like to think of an old and wise king who looked out for us! I > wouldnt mind serving that guy! yes, Serving! > > - Original Message - > From: "Gruss Gott" <

Re: [rant] election results

2005-10-09 Thread Dana
that's pretty sad but probably true. No doubt why attack ads work whether true or not. I just wish I knew how reality could be re-introduced to the public arena Dana On 10/9/05, Jerry Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > True, he was, but apparently he had known the woman who got him there > >

Re: [rant] election results

2005-10-09 Thread Jerry Barnes
> True, he was, but apparently he had known the woman who got him there > since > high school or something, that's sort of a low blow isn't it? > Dana > Yeah, you don't expect your old friends to turn on you. I don't know the details, but she was probably bailing her own tail out of the fire. She

Re: Great Political Summary

2005-10-09 Thread brobborb
Sometimes i like to think of an old and wise king who looked out for us! I wouldnt mind serving that guy! yes, Serving! - Original Message - From: "Gruss Gott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Community" Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2005 9:59 AM Subject: Great Political Summary > "With the

Great Political Summary

2005-10-09 Thread Gruss Gott
"With the Democrats once in power feeling so righteous about their public policies that they think they can do whatever they want in their private lives, and the Republicans so righteous about their private lives that they think they can do whatever they want with respect to public policy, is it an