http://www.gov.ab.ca/home/index.cfm
~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.c
>Hello there,
>
>I was wondering if anyone on the list is currently working or is
>somewhat 'familiar' with the cf job scene in Alberta Canada...
>
>Are there any job opportunities out there?
>Jobs with large firms or smaller firms?
>Any idea on salaries?
>
>I am contemplating making a move to west
I was thinking today that there should be a law relating to politics threads
that is similar to "Godwin's Law" (the Hitler rule). Here is the new law:
"As an online discussion concerning the area of politics grows longer, the
probability of a comparison involving Bill Clinton approaches 1."
-
Hold on... you're saying that a bus driver makes more per year than
yourself?
In NYC, I can see that. It costs a lot of money to live there.
- Matt
- Original Message -
From: "Jerry Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community"
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 8:48 PM
Subject: Re:
Dow Jones, parent of The Wall Street Journal, taking strong exception
to the study:
"The research technique used in this study hardly inspires
confidence. In fact, it is logically suspect and simply baffling in
some of its details.
First, its measure of media bias consists entirely of cou
But Clinton didn't have a warrant, that was the point.
> -Original Message-
> From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 9:48 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: [politics] nobody else seems to be concerned
>
> I was not aware that Clinton did it, but I fin
well i am highly loveable :)
And if you ever go drinking with me make me drink beer. I have it on
words from people have drink with me that i'm much more fun with beer
and when i drink liquor i get mean I DONT see that but its just what
i'm told.
I think its just that i turn into a blubber mouth
did Clinton follow the procedures in place to protect the Constitution?
On 12/21/05, Scott Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If I remember correctly Aims was already the subject of an investigation
> by
> the FBI on federal espionage charges. Clinton authorized the search in the
> name of nat
http://www.cnn.com/US/OJ/arrest/
but there was a judge involved in the process, Nick.
On 12/21/05, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> IIRC they saw red spots on the outside of the bronco.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Scott Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednes
As opposed of course to patriots defending their country against a foreign
invader? As for civilians.. tell it to Fallujah.
On 12/21/05, G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >I am not sure that there is a difference. Bush's pre-emptive war
> > (terrorist action) has cost over 2,100 American lives, 15
hehe ;)
On 12/21/05, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I thought it was because they convinced the cities they set up shops in to
> waive taxes and provide special treatment to them.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 21
That was an incredible post man.
Seriously.
Tim
> -Original Message-
> From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 10:14 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: [politics] nobody else seems to be concerned
>
>
> > Greg wrote:
> > If I don't have any evi
that German they kidnapped in Albania or was it Macedonia -- he wasn't doing
anythng wrong either.
On 12/21/05, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Greg wrote:
> > If I don't have any evil plans of attack against American soil why
> > should I be afraid of them wiretapping my phone?
>
> Ho
that's what I get
Index of /
On 12/21/05, Ray Champagne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Can everyone who has a second try out this address:
>
> http://www.nhbiotech.com
>
> and tell me if a site actually pops up, or if you get something else?
>
> We're having trouble here with this client. I ca
> Greg wrote:
> If I don't have any evil plans of attack against American soil why
> should I be afraid of them wiretapping my phone?
How about if they put a camera in your bedroom? You're not doing
anything wrong so why should it matter? But just to make sure, maybe
they should question you onc
why did I know we'd have a Rush quote before it was all over.
On 12/21/05, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> RUSH ARCHIVE: I think it's amazing that the president got this from
> Congress, but I know why. It happened in the heat of the moment three
> days after September 11th when everybody wants
It's hard to know what to say to this. Did you happen to look at the article
I posted earlier that says otherwise?
I'm going by the fact that they say they're only taping al Qaeda.
Wow.
> They've been doing this sort of thing for over 30 years and in that
> time minus John Mitchell, they've p
ding ding ding folks we have here a lightbulb moment. Of course he
would stoop that low ;) This is the administration that detains American
citizens for years without legal recourse and had to backed into a corner
before it would promise not to torture people ;)
> That would be a crappy gov
no but he has needed one for a wiretap up to now.
When your ex wife has been brutally stabbed to death, and an office coming
> to your home finds blood on your white bronco, does he need a warrant to
> jump the fence? No.
>
~|
but they love you anyway
On 12/21/05, Bill Wheatley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> bah you guys are crazy :P
>
>
>
> On 12/21/05, Ben Doom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Stable != correct
> >
> > William Bowen wrote:
> > >>it seems pretty stable so far.
> > >
> > >
> > > This after reading some of
I was not aware that Clinton did it, but I find it conceivable. And even
maybe acceptable, if a judge issued a warrant for it. This whole claim that
it is just Bush haters bashing him is just incredibly tired after six years
of heavy use.
On 12/21/05, Kevin Graeme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Fo
Maybe it shouldn't matter, but tell that to all the Islamic men who have
harassed over the past few years. And perhaps they won't discover evidence
that you are a terrorist but if you aren't but they may well discover
evidence that you are oh, homosexual, or behind on your child support
payments, o
oh puh-leeze.
On 12/21/05, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 12/21/05, Dana wrote:
> > I know Sam had trouble getting this through his head, so maybe you are
> > having the same problem. Carter and Clinton are no longer president.
>
>
> We learn from history while you pretend it doesn't exist.
I'd guess that if you are afraid to expain to a panel of judges that
overwhelming approves such orders why a search is reasonable, odds are that
it isn't.
On 12/21/05, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Isn't it?
>
> Reasonable is one of those words that can mean different things to
> dif
would you now :)
On 12/21/05, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I was asking what the 4th Amendment said, not the Patriot act.
>
> I haven't read the patriot act, and I'd be willing you haven't read all of
> it either.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
> Jerry wrote:
> So, I say fine the crap out of them, and process their resignation
> letters as fast as you get them.
>
> They are very well paid,
I hear 25% more than private bus drivers. Do whatever to get rid of
them - they will be better off once they learn responsibility
~~
Hello there,
I was wondering if anyone on the list is currently working or is
somewhat 'familiar' with the cf job scene in Alberta Canada...
Are there any job opportunities out there?
Jobs with large firms or smaller firms?
Any idea on salaries?
I am contemplating making a move to western Canada
They usually get "bonus strike pay" during a strike, actually.
On 12/21/05, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah, maybe. Of course one thing is for sure. The union bosses that order
> the strike never get laid off because they are paid by the union.
~
> Sam wrote:
> > I do, in fact, have that right.
>
> Nope
>
What is it that trumps my freedom of association?
~|
Protect your mail server with built in anti-virus protection. It's not only
good for you, it's good for everybody.
This might be co vered below (I am coming in late), but they are
PUBLIC workers, working on the public dime. They provide what have
been designated as vital services.
Those are the only workers who cannot strike. Public employees in
vital service jobs.
They know this when they take the job. It ha
> Sam wrote:
> Also, that supports my point that over the last thirty years the
> government has used this power without abusing it.
>
You like big government and you trust it. I'm a conservative - I'm
for a small limited government, state's rights, etc. And I NEVER
trust it. You are about the
bah you guys are crazy :P
On 12/21/05, Ben Doom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stable != correct
>
> William Bowen wrote:
> >>it seems pretty stable so far.
> >
> >
> > This after reading some of the output?
> >
> > :-P
> >
> > --
> > will
> >
> >
> > "If my life weren't funny, it would just be tr
LOL shit if it was the fire date it would be a fun 20 day job lol
On 12/21/05, Larry C. Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is the 2005 the hire or fire date?
>
> just kidding of course ;)
>
> larry
>
> On 12/21/05, Bill Wheatley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Woo hoo my name plaque came in.
> > Wil
Except for those occasional bugs and outbursts and fits of rage err blue screen.
Ok back to serenity :)
On 12/21/05, Jillian Koskie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My first install was with the William Wheatley 2005 release and it seems
> pretty stable so far.
>
> >I'm waiting for the William Whea
HAHA
anyone who gets the dvd watch the outtakes they are some good stuff.
Some of my favorites.
Did you see us fight???
No
TRAP!!!1
JAYNE TRY NOT TO STEAL TOO MUCH OF THEIR SHIT!
ahh good times i'm such a dork :)
On 12/21/05, Bill Wheatley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> speaking of
I already told you.
On 12/21/05, Bill Wheatley wrote:
> What the hell is there nobody that lives in NYC that wants to give
> their thoughts on the strike? Only people who live in the city really
> have any thing they could really know the inside scoop.
>
> So come on lay it out.
>
~~~
On 12/21/05, Gruss Gott wrote:
> I do, in fact, have that right.
Nope
> You would give up your liberty because you are frightened of
> terrorists. You would allow terrorists to dictate American policy and
> change our lifestyle - that's cowardly and un-American. Possibly
> treasonous. Your wobb
They can't get to their computers,' cause they are work, and there are
no buses to get to work. Duh. :)
Bill Wheatley wrote:
> What the hell is there nobody that lives in NYC that wants to give
> their thoughts on the strike? Only people who live in the city really
> have any thing they could r
What the hell is there nobody that lives in NYC that wants to give
their thoughts on the strike? Only people who live in the city really
have any thing they could really know the inside scoop.
So come on lay it out.
~|
Find out h
speaking of firefly the ups man just got here at 716pm with my serenity dvd :)
Poor guy said he still have another 4 hours or so to go after he takes
his lunch.
Oh well at least all of us will get our gifts. And he liked that i
gave him a coke lol.
--
William Wheatley
Coldfusion Guru
~~~
> Sam wrote:
> You don't have the right to give aid, comfort or information to al
> Qeada unless you want to crawl into one of their caves, nor should
> you.
>
I do, in fact, have that right.
You would give up your liberty because you are frightened of
terrorists. You would allow terrorists to d
On 12/21/05, Gruss Gott wrote:
> > Sam wrote:
> > RUSH ARCHIVE
>
> Regarding this issue, I could give a shit what the founding fathers
> intended, wanted, or thought.
I noticed.
> What I want is to have my liberty protected by law, and to pursue my
> life without government intervention. I don'
She sure looks like it here:
http://tinyurl.com/b7mxl
~|
Sams Teach Yourself Regular Expressions in 10 Minutes by Ben Forta
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=40
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.
> Sam wrote:
> RUSH ARCHIVE
Regarding this issue, I could give a shit what the founding fathers
intended, wanted, or thought.
What I want is to have my liberty protected by law, and to pursue my
life without government intervention. I don't trust government and I
want as small a gov't as possibl
Stable != correct
William Bowen wrote:
>>it seems pretty stable so far.
>
>
> This after reading some of the output?
>
> :-P
>
> --
> will
>
>
> "If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
> and that would just be unacceptable."
> - Carrie Fisher
>
>
I've only seen the screenshots...
>> it seems pretty stable so far.
>
>This after reading some of the output?
>
>:-P
>
>--
>will
~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble
Ticket application
http://www
> Ken wrote:
> Yes, it says, "we must stay the course"
>
Yeah, but it doesn't sound like that. It's more like this:
Yoo liiikkkee BBBIIGGG govvvernmmmennnt.
Ttttrrr govvvernmmmennnt. Ttttrrr
govvvernmmmennnt.
Of course if you play forward then
Actually, to my point - that's what cf-community says.
-Cameron
On 12/21/05, Ken Ketsdever <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, it says, "we must stay the course"
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Cameron Childress [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 2:05 PM
> To: CF-
RUSH ARCHIVE: I think it's amazing that the president got this from
Congress, but I know why. It happened in the heat of the moment three
days after September 11th when everybody wants to show unity and
resolve and all that. But here: Let me just read the relevant section
here from the op-ed itself
Yes, it says, "we must stay the course"
-Original Message-
From: Cameron Childress [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 2:05 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: [politics] nobody else seems to be concerned
If a hair splits and no-one from cf-community is there to poi
Same rule applies when US Armed Forces are imminently involved in hostilities.
On 12/21/05, William Bowen wrote:
> > The declaration of war is just a
> > formality.
>
> A formality, yes, but a very important one, nonetheless.
>
> An actual declaration is the lynchpin here, there isn't one, so it
>
Oh yeah, jimmy split just the other day and hasn't shut-up sense!
> -Original Message-
> From: Cameron Childress [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 5:05 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: [politics] nobody else seems to be concerned
>
> If a hair splits and n
If a hair splits and no-one from cf-community is there to point it
out, does it make a sound?
-Cameron
On 12/21/05, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think the point is that American troops have been on combat in more than 5
> different events.
>
> War in my mind has a very specific out
I think the point is that American troops have been on combat in more than 5
different events.
War in my mind has a very specific outcome. Out right annihilation of the
enemy. Anything that can assist him is a target. A food processing plant
thus is a target.
The word civilian no-longer exists. J
> Congress has only declared war five times:
> War of 1812
> Mexican-American
> Spanish-American
> WW I and II
yes, and?
--
will
"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable."
- Carrie Fisher
~
> The declaration of war is just a
> formality.
A formality, yes, but a very important one, nonetheless.
An actual declaration is the lynchpin here, there isn't one, so it
follows your argument is without merit.
--
will
"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be u
> it seems pretty stable so far.
This after reading some of the output?
:-P
--
will
"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable."
- Carrie Fisher
~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading Co
Congress has only declared war five times:
War of 1812
Mexican-American
Spanish-American
WW I and II
On 12/21/05, Tim Heald wrote:
> Fighting a police action in an undeclared war, that I supported.
>
> I've always said that that was my biggest problem with every deployment I
> went on, no actual
On 12/21/05, Tim Heald wrote:
> BTW don't use my service to back up your weak points.
I don't think they're weak.
> I'll be the only one to do that thank you. It's my service.
You're right, sorry. Won't happen again.
~|
Prote
As commander-in-chief of the military the president does have the
authority send U.S. troops into battle.
The constitution recognizes that wars would be lost if we had to wait
for congress to approve them. The declaration of war is just a
formality. Congress can use its powers to control the money
With Afghanistan, who would we have declared war on?
The diplomatic lines were so blurry wouldn't we have had to declare war on a
country we didn't even recognize. Does that even work?
> -Original Message-
> From: Tim Heald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 4
As long as it doesn't say 'RIP' after his name, I think he's okay.
>Is the 2005 the hire or fire date?
>
>just kidding of course ;)
>
>larry
~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support
efficiency by 100
Is the 2005 the hire or fire date?
just kidding of course ;)
larry
On 12/21/05, Bill Wheatley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Woo hoo my name plaque came in.
> William Wheatley 2005 :>
>
> --
>
> William Wheatley
> Coldfusion Guru
>
>
~~
After the fact, my point being, that a search was made without a warrant,
and the judge ruled that the blood drops gave police enough to search the
residence.
It was ruled a reasonable search based on the information available to the
officers.
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Stewart [m
BTW don't use my service to back up your weak points.
I'll be the only one to do that thank you. It's my service.
> -Original Message-
> From: Sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 3:55 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: [politics] nobody else seems to be
Fighting a police action in an undeclared war, that I supported.
I've always said that that was my biggest problem with every deployment I
went on, no actual declaration of war. With a declaration of war the
military gets far broader powers, and much much more money and resources.
Resources and
My first install was with the William Wheatley 2005 release and it seems pretty
stable so far.
>I'm waiting for the William Wheatley 2006 release. The 2004 version is
>still working okay here.
~|
All-in-one: antivirus, antispam,
This is a case where the judge made the call on constitutionality.
sas
Scott A. Stewart
ColdFusion Developer
GNSI
11820 Parklawn Dr
Rockville, MD 20852
(301) 770-9610
-Original Message-
From: Nick McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 4:21 PM
To: CF-Co
In some ways I wish we had name plaques here. I can't tell you the number of
times I've had to wander around this huge building trying to find somebody I've
never met.
However, I kind of like that some people walk through the IS department and
aren't sure who everybody is.
>nah we all get n
I'm waiting for the William Wheatley 2006 release. The 2004 version is
still working okay here.
On 12/21/05, Ray Champagne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want a name plaque!
>
> Do you work at a bank or something? :)
>
> Bill Wheatley wrote:
> > Woo hoo my name plaque came in.
> > William Wheatle
IIRC they saw red spots on the outside of the bronco.
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 4:17 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: [politics] nobody else seems to be concerned
>
> Did they give a justification for the
> I agree, I think the wiretaps that Bush is speaking of should only be
> used to counter terrorist attacks.. I don't think anyone should abuse
> it to check up on an individual just because said person doesnt like
> them...
Umm... hence the reason for the special court, to prevent potential abuse
> Jim wrote:
> Yeah... this really does strike of white-collar elitism on his part.
>
Ok, let's take my father-in-law who's a machinist. He saw that
manufacturing was on the way out years ago and switched to the
millwrights. Then he got his security clearance for nuclear power
plants and he trav
Did they give a justification for the search of Brentwood then?
sas
Scott A. Stewart
ColdFusion Developer
GNSI
11820 Parklawn Dr
Rockville, MD 20852
(301) 770-9610
-Original Message-
From: Nick McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 4:09 PM
To: CF-Commu
Agreed, if not for Aldrich Aimes, we might not even be having this
conversation.
I'm not necessarily against this, but it must be tightly controlled. I think
what many are afraid of (myself included) is Bush's seemingly cavalier
attitude toward the whole thing.
I watched the press conference and
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 8:54 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: "Firefly" all done according to Joss Whedon
>
> I wonder what the box office sales from the rest of the world is like.
> That's saved a numbe
> Matt wrote:
> So are you being sarcastic or serious?
>
Serious! That's a great line and a succinct way of describing the yield loss.
~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support
efficiency by 100%
htt
> I always called them 'suicide seats' :)
Easier to get people to ride in them when not refered to as "suicide seats"
;-)
--
will
"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable."
- Carrie Fisher
~~
The bodies were found at Nicole's house, not at the Brentwood estate.
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 3:52 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: [politics] nobody else seems to be concerned
>
> Here's how they'd just
But he didn't know he was being investigated.
What Bush is doing is also for National Security. I'm not saying
Clinton was wrong, just that he went a lot further than Bush did and
very few complained.
Apparently this wire-tapping prevented the Brooklyn Bridge Bombing
On 12/21/05, Scott Stewart wro
> I wonder what Tim was doing in Afghanistan.
Fighting. As per powers granted the president by Congress without a
Declaration of War...
Congress _did_not_ grant the President the right to overrule or
circumvent the Constitution, they did not declare War!
--
will
"If my life weren't funny, it
> Bush is a bozo.
Hey! That's President Bozo!
You watch your step. Careful about any "international" calls.
--
will
"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable."
- Carrie Fisher
~|
Fi
If I remember correctly Aims was already the subject of an investigation by
the FBI on federal espionage charges. Clinton authorized the search in the
name of national security.
Now are you implying that it was not alright for Clinton to do this, but
it's alright for Bush to, for exactly the s
I wonder what Tim was doing in Afghanistan.
On 12/21/05, William Bowen wrote:
> > I read the constitution gives the president to use force in time of
> > war to protect its citizens
>
> Yeah, strange how I read at only Congress shall have the ability to
> declare War. Which they haven't done in mo
Here's how they'd justify that... because the bodies were found at the
Simpson residence, the entire residence becomes a crime scene, and eligible
for a search
Whether or not that's legal is up for debate, the judge in this case said it
was, and no one challenged it.
sas
Scott A. Stewart
Col
So again anyone of you guys who posted so far live in NYC? Just
curious on the local view i guess mikeyd still is walking to work :)
On 12/21/05, William Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> good point!
>
> Which I think we too often do (as a society...)
>
> On 12/21/05, Chesty Puller <[EMAIL PROT
nah we all get name plaques. Was just suprised they got it to me
before my 90 days are up.
On 12/21/05, Ray Champagne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want a name plaque!
>
> Do you work at a bank or something? :)
>
> Bill Wheatley wrote:
> > Woo hoo my name plaque came in.
> > William Wheatley 20
Is it hump day again?
OK, time to talk about the Iraq war and all the innocent live lost again
On 12/21/05, G wrote:
> >I am not sure that there is a difference. Bush's pre-emptive war
> > (terrorist action) has cost over 2,100 American lives, 15,000+ Americans
> > injured, and tens of thous
> I read the constitution gives the president to use force in time of
> war to protect its citizens
Yeah, strange how I read at only Congress shall have the ability to
declare War. Which they haven't done in more than 60 years.
So while we may be involved in a War on Terror, we are not actually
_
Before
http://www.fas.org/irp/offdocs/eo/eo-12949.htm
On 12/21/05, Scott Stewart wrote:
> Before or after the arrest?
>
~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble
Ticket application
http://www.houseof
> That depends.. you can't be arrested for an opinion.
Not yet. And at this rate, it won't be too much longer.
> I'm sure they
> could hound you and try to find something but come on.. the gov't
> doesn't have anything better to do?
> They'd wiretap an angry voter over an actual danger?
How man
i get the site but no images load
~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cf
One site, that is a little slanted, claims the search warrant was issued 3
hours after officers first went into the Simpson residence, and that he was
arrested after that.
The glove was found by Furman while OJ was still in Chicago, he had not been
arrested, and no warrant was obtained.
http://ww
>I am not sure that there is a difference. Bush's pre-emptive war
> (terrorist action) has cost over 2,100 American lives, 15,000+ Americans
> injured, and tens of thousands of injured or killed Iraqis, most of
> which were innocent civilians caught in the cross fire, collateral
> damage etc...
M
Before or after the arrest?
sas
Scott A. Stewart
ColdFusion Developer
GNSI
11820 Parklawn Dr
Rockville, MD 20852
(301) 770-9610
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 3:33 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: [politics] nobody else seem
He was the American spy and Clinton ordered his home searched without a warrant.
On 12/21/05, Scott Stewart wrote:
> Huh?
>
> Aldrich Ames was his name
~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support
effic
Voluntarily donning the uniform of an armed military, actively engaging in
war..pretty much strips you of your innocence. Even if your cause is
just.
> You mean like the over 2100 innocent men and women sent by their
> President into Iraq in a pre-emptive war based on fictitious evidence.
>
I am not sure that there is a difference. Bush's pre-emptive war
(terrorist action) has cost over 2,100 American lives, 15,000+ Americans
injured, and tens of thousands of injured or killed Iraqis, most of
which were innocent civilians caught in the cross fire, collateral
damage etc...
We had no
I'm trying to find a timeline but I can't find anything on the web.
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 3:25 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: [politics] nobody else seems to be concerned
>
> The first arrest was eit
The first arrest was either after 1) finding the bodies on his front
doorstep or 2) the low speed chase. The glove was found in a search after
one of these arrests.
sas
Scott A. Stewart
ColdFusion Developer
GNSI
11820 Parklawn Dr
Rockville, MD 20852
(301) 770-9610
-Original Message-
1 - 100 of 369 matches
Mail list logo
