RE: Feds Subpoena Google

Did you even read this article that you posted? Tim > -Original Message- > From: Sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 5:14 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: Feds Subpoena Google > > > I agree but you have to do what you can to save lives. > > http://www.u

Re: Feds Subpoena Goggle

Larry tried to tie the two together but it was an honest mistake. I also thought it was a privacy issue when I read the AP version, it was the mention of the ACLU that convinced me there was more to this story. On 1/19/06, Loathe wrote: > How many Al Queda sponsored google searches do you think th

Re: Feds Subpoena Google

I hate to be the bearer of bad news but this is a public list :) On 1/19/06, dana tierney wrote: > ok. I hereby declare that you are a member of al Qaeda. See my point? > > Dana > > PS - hi, Carnivore. ~| Message: http://www.hous

Re: How I bruised my arm

dude, like lay off the ho ho's heh ehhehhheeh ehhheehhh On 1/19/06, Jim Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Robert Munn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 4:38 PM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: How I bruised my arm > > > >

RE: How I bruised my arm

> -Original Message- > From: Robert Munn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 4:38 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: How I bruised my arm > > So I have a big nasty bruise (fading now) on my left elbow and biceps. > Here is a photo of how I earned it. Check out the lo

Re: So what story SHOULD be made into a movie?

Agreed >The Dragon riders of Pern series. Man would that be cool. > >> ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:193415 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.ho

Re: So what story SHOULD be made into a movie?

Good Omens! alright. >> I'd like to see either Larry Niven's Ringworld or Man/Kzin War series made >> into a movie. > >, that reminds me of another couple of Larry Niven and Jerry >Pournelle novels: > >The Mote in God's Eye and The Gripping Hand. > >Decent scifi with lots of stuff for the CG/p

Re: Feds Subpoena Google

ok. I hereby declare that you are a member of al Qaeda. See my point? Dana PS - hi, Carnivore. >Didn't we already do this argument? >Anyway our constitution does not apply to al Qaeda members > >On 1/19/06, Loathe wrote: >> Not at the cost of the constitution. ~~

Re: GMAIL - Delete button in Inbox now!!

I have one now. Maybe you have to wish for it really really hard :) >its been in the drop down forever. >i have an actual button now... some do, and most dont. >tw > >On 1/19/06, Chris Stoner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> ~| Mess

Re: Blogs

Mine is usually pointless too. :-) But that's ok I like it. Yves On 1/19/06, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > its funny larry. mine is pointless. but you know what. sometimes i > have technical stuff that i just want to remember, events that happen > in my life that might be cool to

Your digital dirt and job searches

http://www.careerjournal.com/jobhunting/usingnet/20060112-flesher.html?cjpos=jobhunting_whatsnew http://tinyurl.com/9bc38 How to Clean Up Your Digital Dirt Before It Trashes Your Job Search Unflattering personal information drifting around the Internet, known by some as "digital dirt," can doom

Re: If you had to change your name, what might you change it to?

Herbert Blogwell. Michael B. - Original Message - From: "Jason Lemahieu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Community" Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 10:47 PM Subject: Re: If you had to change your name, what might you change it to? > Why would anyone change Chris Stoner?? > > that's what

RE: Feds Subpoena Goggle

heheheheheh Scott A. Stewart ColdFusion Developer GNSI 11820 Parklawn Dr Rockville, MD 20852 (301) 770-9610 -Original Message- From: Loathe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 7:33 PM To: CF-Community Subject: RE: Feds Subpoena Goggle How many Al Queda sponsor

RE: Feds Subpoena Goggle

How many Al Queda sponsored google searches do you think there are? Tim > -Original Message- > From: Scott Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 7:24 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: Feds Subpoena Google > > > But it does to American citizens, and it's

RE: Feds Subpoena Google

But it does to American citizens, and it's American citizen's phones that are being tapped Scott A. Stewart ColdFusion Developer GNSI 11820 Parklawn Dr Rockville, MD 20852 (301) 770-9610 -Original Message- From: Sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 7:12 PM T

Re: Feds Subpoena Google

Didn't we already do this argument? Anyway our constitution does not apply to al Qaeda members On 1/19/06, Loathe wrote: > Not at the cost of the constitution. ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:193405 Ar

RE: Feds Subpoena Google

Not at the cost of the constitution. Tim > -Original Message- > From: Sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 5:14 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: Feds Subpoena Google > > > I agree but you have to do what you can to save lives. > > http://www.upi.com/News

RE: So what story SHOULD be made into a movie?

Only one of the best Sci Fi/satire series ever written. Tim > -Original Message- > From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 5:11 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: So what story SHOULD be made into a movie? > > > > Matt wrote: > > It's too bad that

Re: GMAIL - Delete button in Inbox now!!

http://mail.google.com/mail/help/about_whatsnew.html ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:193402 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists

Re: Feds Subpoena Google

Here's the obvious solution: http://blog.outer-court.com/patriot/privacy.html ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:193401 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://w

Re: How I bruised my arm

It was pretty sweet. :-) That day was nice, but the day before was even bigger and super-clean in the morning. There is a shot of me from that day as well, 9.jpg on this page: http://68.15.13.68/1-7-06/1_7_2006.html me paddling into a breaking wave, but the photos on that page are huge format

Re: Blogs

its funny larry. mine is pointless. but you know what. sometimes i have technical stuff that i just want to remember, events that happen in my life that might be cool to look back on. right now, most of my 20's is a fucking blur. if i had a blog since then, holy shit, i would no longer be gues

Re: GMAIL - Delete button in Inbox now!!

imagine a 12 year old girl saying it as slyly as possible not sure where i saw or heard it first, but someone said it in that kinda voice (as described above) tw On 1/19/06, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I read neener neener neener, and the sound in my head is an annoying > police c

Re: How I bruised my arm

damn dog looks like one killer swell. tw On 1/19/06, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So I have a big nasty bruise (fading now) on my left elbow and biceps. Here > is a photo of how I earned it. Check out the lower left image on the page: > > http://68.15.13.68/1-8-06/1-8-06.html > > > >

Re: Feds Subpoena Google

Exactly. of the almost 1000 warrents that went before the FISA court, only 8, repeat 8 were rejected. So what gives about the most recent illegal wiretaps. Was he worried that they would be rejected out of hand. larry On 1/19/06, Kevin Graeme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ha! If that article is

Re: So what story SHOULD be made into a movie?

The really strange part of the whole thing is that Hubbard published more novels after he died than before. Neat trick that. That said, he did one thiing that was really brilliant, establishing a prize for previously unpublished SF writers that gurarenteed publication. larry On 1/19/06, Kevin Gr

How I bruised my arm

So I have a big nasty bruise (fading now) on my left elbow and biceps. Here is a photo of how I earned it. Check out the lower left image on the page: http://68.15.13.68/1-8-06/1-8-06.html Rob ~| Message: http://www.houseoffu

Re: Feds Subpoena Google

Ha! If that article is credible, what that tells me is that Bush was asking for a shitpot of unreasonable or illegal wiretaps. If that court was rejecting them, then you KNOW they were bad since they approve everything. On 1/19/06, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I agree but you have to do what y

Re: So what story SHOULD be made into a movie?

It's more Hubbard crap. On 1/19/06, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yeah, Battlefield Earth was one of my favorite books. What's Mission: > Earth? Too lazy to look it up. > > ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/l

Re: Feds Subpoena Google

Isn't that what started this new war? Getting BJs instead of doing the job? On 1/19/06, Gruss Gott wrote: > I want a president that's not afraid to drop his drawers now and > again. Keeps the stress down. > > Good ole Billy ... those were the days. All we had to worry about > were BJs and inter

Re: Feds Subpoena Google

Maybe you should re-read it :) On 1/19/06, Gruss Gott wrote: > > Maybe you need to understand it. Here's what it says in plain language: > > FEDS: Hey, we're the feds, we can look up your butt with a microscope > if we want. And we don't even need a good reason. > > GOOGLE: Uh, that's an exit on

Re: Feds Subpoena Google

I agree but you have to do what you can to save lives. http://www.upi.com/NewsTrack/view.php?StoryID=20051226-122526-7310r WASHINGTON, Dec. 26 (UPI) -- U.S. President George Bush decided to skip seeking warrants for international wiretaps because the court was challenging him at an unprecedented

Re: So what story SHOULD be made into a movie?

> Matt wrote: > It's too bad that Battlefield Earth was such an abortion. The ten books of > Mission: Earth are still out there... > Yeah, Battlefield Earth was one of my favorite books. What's Mission: Earth? Too lazy to look it up.

Re: Blogs

Thanks for that one Jeff. I've appreciated your articles in CFDJ and your posts on CF-Talk.I'll add this one to my blog list. One of these years I'll have to start. I feel that I just don't have much to say. larry On 1/19/06, Jeffry Houser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

Re: Feds Subpoena Google

> Sam wrote: > Maybe we all need to read this: Maybe you need to understand it. Here's what it says in plain language: FEDS: Hey, we're the feds, we can look up your butt with a microscope if we want. And we don't even need a good reason. GOOGLE: Uh, that's an exit only door and we don't want

Re: If you had to change your name, what might you change it to?

Thats almost as bad as Mac McClorg larry On 1/19/06, Deanna Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Fluffy Penwall > > (But, that's not really the first street I lived on - just the first one I > remember. > > > ~| Message: htt

Re: Blogs

I've had no luck getting the CF feed syndicated to weblogs.macromedia.com or to fullasagoog.com, though. At 04:07 PM 1/19/2006, you wrote: >Subject: Blogs >From: "Chesty Puller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 09:38:48 -0500 >Thread: >http://www.house

Re: Feds Subpoena Google

Maybe we all need to read this: http://i.i.com.com/cnwk.1d/pdf/ne/2006/google-doj/mcelvain.declaration.pdf This has nothing to do with protect peoples privacy, they're afraid to give away secrets. On 1/19/06, Larry C. Lyons wrote: > You mean the part dealing with unreasonable search and seizures.

RE: So what story SHOULD be made into a movie?

> -Original Message- > From: Chesty Puller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 9:18 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: So what story SHOULD be made into a movie? > > You didn't like "Greystoke"? That was one of the best. I did... and didn't. It left out a lot

Re: Feds Subpoena Google

> G Money wrote: > Today its a president you might like > and/or trusttomorrow it might not be. > I want a president that's not afraid to drop his drawers now and again. Keeps the stress down. Good ole Billy ... those were the days. All we had to worry about were BJs and interns. ~

Re: Feds Subpoena Google

On 1/19/06, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1/19/06, William Bowen wrote: > > > You don't see a problem with doing an end-run around the > > Constitutional checks and balances? > > Show me where in the Constitution anonymous search patterns are mentioned. You mean the part dealing with unreaso

Re: Feds Subpoena Google

I don't go by labels On 1/19/06, Tim Heald wrote: > You are a Republican, however you are NOT a conservative. ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:193379 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/thre

Re: If you had to change your name, what might you change it to?

Fluffy Penwall (But, that's not really the first street I lived on - just the first one I remember. ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:193378 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5

Re: GMAIL - Delete button in Inbox now!!

I read neener neener neener, and the sound in my head is an annoying police car chase in europe. On 1/19/06, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i had it first... neener neeener neeener :) ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/l

RE: Feds Subpoena Google

You are a Republican, however you are NOT a conservative. > -Original Message- > From: Sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 4:19 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: Feds Subpoena Google > > On 1/19/06, William Bowen wrote: > > > You don't see a problem with

Re: Feds Subpoena Google

We should tell them :) On 1/19/06, Kevin Graeme wrote: > If that's really all they want, then the government shouldn't bother > with a subpeona. They should just go here and figure out how to get it > http://www.google.com/apis/ . If it's not something they can get > through that, then it's circum

Re: Feds Subpoena Google

On 1/19/06, William Bowen wrote: > You don't see a problem with doing an end-run around the > Constitutional checks and balances? Show me where in the Constitution anonymous search patterns are mentioned. > >They aren't asking to identify people, > > They aren't? Really? Yes, they are not. > >

Re: recommended tool for converting videos

check this out: http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/xbox-360/the-360-does-divx-148837.php it appears to be on the fly divx transcoding so divx can be streamed to the 360. _sweet_. ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/

RE: Feds Subpoena Google

The Hibernians for one. Good people, just badly mislead by communists/Maoists. > -Original Message- > From: Sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 3:52 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: Feds Subpoena Google > > If Bin Laden is calling a US Citizen I hope NS

Re: GMAIL - Delete button in Inbox now!!

i had it first... neener neeener neeener :) tw On 1/19/06, Deanna Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've got it. Neener neener. > > On 1/18/06, Kevin Graeme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hm. Nope. Still no Delete. I must be in a different release cluster or > > something. > > > > On 1/

Re: GMAIL - Delete button in Inbox now!!

MotherfI want a refund! On 1/19/06, Deanna Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've got it. Neener neener. > > On 1/18/06, Kevin Graeme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hm. Nope. Still no Delete. I must be in a different release cluster or > > something. ~

Re: GMAIL - Delete button in Inbox now!!

I guess I just hadn't noticed it, but then I haven't looked for it since this topic came up. It wasnt actually there forever was it? I seem to remember have to archive first, delete second early on. On 1/19/06, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > its been in the drop down forever. > i have an act

RE: Superbowl

Hard core Black and Decker baby ;) :D Cheers, Erika -- ##| From: Tim Heald ##| ##| What kind of router are you using? ##| Cisco? ##| Black and Decker? ~| Message: http:

Re: GMAIL - Delete button in Inbox now!!

its been in the drop down forever. i have an actual button now... some do, and most dont. tw On 1/19/06, Chris Stoner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was looking for a delete button and still do not have one. But I do > notice a delete option in the "More Actions..." select box. Is this what is >

Re: Feds Subpoena Google

If that's really all they want, then the government shouldn't bother with a subpeona. They should just go here and figure out how to get it http://www.google.com/apis/ . If it's not something they can get through that, then it's circumspect. On 1/19/06, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's a requ

Re: GMAIL - Delete button in Inbox now!!

I've got it. Neener neener. On 1/18/06, Kevin Graeme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hm. Nope. Still no Delete. I must be in a different release cluster or > something. > > On 1/18/06, Zaphod Beeblebrox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I did have to sign out and sign back in to get it. > >

Re: Feds Subpoena Google

The Catholic wing of Al-Qaeda of course. I'm sorry, but this is so ridiculous. The NSA already has the right and the ability to eavesdrop on Americans...WITH a court approved warrant. There is absolutely no reason for the NSA or the Bush administration or ANYBODY to claim they have to circumve

Re: Feds Subpoena Google

> What's the problem? You don't see a problem with doing an end-run around the Constitutional checks and balances? >They aren't asking to identify people, They aren't? Really? > just search > patterns to determine if the child filters are working. So, then how is the government, you know the o

Re: Feds Subpoena Google

Indeed. Which is why it's a GOOD thing that they're trying to protect the privacy of those records. Because we already know the current administration doesn't give a damn about privacy. On 1/19/06, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What's really scary is what Google does know and store > about ther

Re: Feds Subpoena Google

How are they going to find patterns in the data without identifying the age of users? If all they need is to know if filtering the results work, then anyone can do that with the publicly available interface tools. On 1/19/06, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What's the problem? They aren't asking

Re: Feds Subpoena Google

If Bin Laden is calling a US Citizen I hope NSA is listening in. What Catholic groups are you talking about? On 1/19/06, Larry C. Lyons wrote: > You mean just like the NSA is wiretapping trecherous American > citizens, like several different Catholic groups. > > "They who would give up an essentia

Re: GMAIL - Delete button in Inbox now!!

I was looking for a delete button and still do not have one. But I do notice a delete option in the "More Actions..." select box. Is this what is being referred to as a "delete button" or do some of you have an actual button? Either way, I will happily take the option and maybe the others who do

Re: Feds Subpoena Google

It's a request for 1 million searches. What the search term was and what links resulted. No identities so no privacy violations. It's not even likely they'll catch more than one search per person and if they do they don't know who the person is. On 1/19/06, Tim Heald wrote: > I choose to use Googl

Re: ABC Distributing Closing may 31st

NOW On 1/19/06, Tim Heald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As do I, at appropriate times. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Paul Ihrig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 3:36 PM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: Re: ABC Distributing Closing may 31st > > > > i l

Re: Feds Subpoena Google

> Billy, you're doin' a heckofajob! I like your strategery. Got my sleeves rolled up too. Now it looks like i's really workin. -- will "If my life weren't funny, it would just be true; and that would just be unacceptable." - Carrie Fisher ~~

RE: ABC Distributing Closing may 31st

As do I, at appropriate times. > -Original Message- > From: Paul Ihrig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 3:36 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: ABC Distributing Closing may 31st > > i like glow sticks > > > ~~

RE: Feds Subpoena Google

Can't you see it's the same thing with guns? It's such a simple leap man. > -Original Message- > From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 3:34 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: Feds Subpoena Google > > You mean just like the NSA is wiretappin

Re: Feds Subpoena Google

They didn't strike it down its in limbo. They said they believe filtering will do the job so the law wasn't needed but a full trial in Philly would determine that. It's not about censorship, it's about proving you're old enough, same as looking at a Playboy at 7/11. On 1/19/06, William Bowen wrot

Re: ABC Distributing Closing may 31st

i like glow sticks ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:193352 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http:

RE: Feds Subpoena Google

I choose to use Google. I give them permission to collect such information by using their services. I have not given either Google, or the federal government to use that information is such away. I should, at a minimum have 4th amendment protections against this, if not 1st. > -Original Mes

Re: Feds Subpoena Google

> Billy wrote: > Men will marry rabbits, and monkeys will be promoted to high office! > Opposition to our requests makes it obvious that they are guilty of > malfeasical practices. > Billy, you're doin' a heckofajob! I like your strategery. ~~~

Re: Feds Subpoena Google

You mean just like the NSA is wiretapping trecherous American citizens, like several different Catholic groups. "They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security." On 1/19/06, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What's the problem? They aren't a

Re: Feds Subpoena Google

What's the problem? They aren't asking to identify people, just search patterns to determine if the child filters are working. This means children doing harmless searches that get tricked into going to porn sites that the filters miss. Whitehouse.com comes to mind. All the other search engines comp

Re: Woot! New lappytop!

> Dutch wrote: > WPA. Enterpise if you can, else Home. > +1 I use WPA-PSK with TKIP encryption. I don't know what any of that means anymore, and I know it makes adding new devices tough, but it's supposed to be good. Also I don't broadcast the SSID and limit clients via a MAC filter list (allow

RE: Feds Subpoena Google

I can't wait for 2007. > -Original Message- > From: William Bowen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 3:17 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: Feds Subpoena Google > > > So who wrote the subpoena? > > DOJ. Which is their job. > > But I think the really intere

Re: Feds Subpoena Google

> So who wrote the subpoena? DOJ. Which is their job. But I think the really interesting part of this is that the Supreme Court already struck this law down. So I guess El Presidente decided that since he's got Alito coming on board he can get this another go'round. Then when the unconstitutiona

RE: ABC Distributing Closing may 31st

Some people seriously need to put down the pipe, put the pacifier and the glow sticks and the Vicks back in the closet and drink some water. > -Original Message- > From: Jillian Koskie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 2:07 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: A

Re: ABC Distributing Closing may 31st

What? What happened?Where am I? God I hate when this happens. >This is on community. ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:193343 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription:

RE: Feds Subpoena Google

Jesus I can't believe this. So who wrote the subpoena? The Senate? Can the executive write one for their own investigation into this law? Why would it matter what Google searches show up? Christ can you imagine how bad to Google images results would look? > -Original Message- > From:

Re: ABC Distributing Closing may 31st

yea, who the eff is ABC distributing and why should i care :) tw On 1/19/06, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bill, > > Was this meant for cf-community? > > If so...What? > > On 1/19/06, Bill Wheatley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Couldn't have happened to a nicer company. > > ~~

Re: Feds Subpoena Google

> Insanity. but, now son, dontcha see? If the Internets are unfettered and porn is readily available through search engines like the high profile Gooble, glooge...heh... the terrorists will win! Men will marry rabbits, and monkeys will be promoted to high office! Opposition to our requests makes

Re: If you had to change your name, what might you change it to?

Say no more! --Ben Jerry Johnson wrote: > No, that's a valid porn misspelling. > > Lie sure. > > Got an meaningless sexual innuendo as part of the misspelling. > > Know what I mean? Wink wink. Nudge Nudge. > > On 1/19/06, Kevin Graeme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Dammit, I typo'd my porn nam

Re: Superbowl

I thought you were going to go with a "the specs say you can't power either for more than 5 yards". ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:193338 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 S

Re: Language Abuse

If your code was a professional skysurfer, would it be a high-performance performant? If there were holes in its security, would it be a perforated performant? If it smelled good, a perfumed performant? Torturing the language for a more strategical tomorrow, --Ben Dawson, Michael wrote: > Her

RE: ABC Distributing Closing may 31st

This is on community. > -Original Message- > From: Jerry Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 2:53 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: ABC Distributing Closing may 31st > > Bill, > > Was this meant for cf-community? > > If so...What? > > On 1/19/06, B

Re: Feds Subpoena Google

He's on a mission from Gawd to straighen up America and so he has the power to do this. or so the reasoning goes if you read the presidential declaration on the McCain anti-torture legislation. larry On 1/19/06, Tim Heald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Insanity. > > > -Original Message- >

Re: ABC Distributing Closing may 31st

Bill, Was this meant for cf-community? If so...What? On 1/19/06, Bill Wheatley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Couldn't have happened to a nicer company. ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:193334 Archives:

RE: If you had to change your name, what might you change it to?

Not to mention it would be easier to avoid a copyright or trademark infringement if you misspelled it. > -Original Message- > From: Chesty Puller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 2:41 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: If you had to change your name, what mig

Re: If you had to change your name, what might you change it to?

No, that's a valid porn misspelling. Lie sure. Got an meaningless sexual innuendo as part of the misspelling. Know what I mean? Wink wink. Nudge Nudge. On 1/19/06, Kevin Graeme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dammit, I typo'd my porn name! Now I'll never get a job. > > -Black Leisure > > On 1/19/0

Re: If you had to change your name, what might you change it to?

Spelling well is not a requirement for porn actor. - Matt - Original Message - From: "Kevin Graeme" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Community" Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 2:45 PM Subject: Re: If you had to change your name, what might you change it to? > Dammit, I typo'd my porn name

Re: If you had to change your name, what might you change it to?

Dammit, I typo'd my porn name! Now I'll never get a job. -Black Leisure On 1/19/06, Kevin Graeme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Black Liesure ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:193329 Archives: http://www.

RE: Feds Subpoena Google

Insanity. > -Original Message- > From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 2:39 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Feds Subpoena Google > > Google Gets Subpoena > In Federal Porn Probe > Associated Press > January 19, 2006 1:37 p.m. > > The Bush admini

Language Abuse

Here is one I hate to see: Who the fek thought to mis-use this word in the context of quick-running applications? "Performant" -- Does *not* mean "high-performance". Performant: A performer. http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=performant Example: "My code is performant." "So you m

Re: ABC Distributing Closing may 31st

I didn't even know who ABC was. But I found this and it's enough for me. http://www.resellerratings.com/seller3525.html On 1/19/06, Bill Wheatley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Couldn't have happened to a nicer company. > They are not really closing so much as their sister company LTD bought > out A

Re: CF Developer Position

Good salary? On 1/19/06, Michael T. Tangorre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We are looking for a ColdFusion developer to work in our Chevy Chase and/or > Silver Spring office. Shoot me an email off-list or contact me on AIM: > mtangorre for more information. > > I am going to post a detailed descri

Re: Superbowl

Hey, I do puns and regex. You folk can do football -- I don't much care for it. Besides, if he was lame, he'd be on the injured list. --Ben Ray Champagne wrote: > Well, if we name that bus driver Jerome Bettis, then we have ourselves a > joke. Albeit it kinda lame, but better than I did. :)

ABC Distributing Closing may 31st

Couldn't have happened to a nicer company. They are not really closing so much as their sister company LTD bought out ABC and is merging operations in chicago. But thankfully the scumbags that run the company are out of work but who cares after they bilked millions out of the version scams they wer

Feds Subpoena Google

Google Gets Subpoena In Federal Porn Probe Associated Press January 19, 2006 1:37 p.m. The Bush administration, seeking to revive an online pornography law struck down by the Supreme Court, has subpoenaed Google Inc. for details on what its users have been looking for through its popular search en

Re: RDP

Use gotomypc.com it is great and very affordable. Also it gets around any proxies that might be a problem. But if you need a legit xp pro license i have one that i dont use so get with me later and i'll send it if you want. On 1/18/06, Zaphod Beeblebrox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I used to use

Re: Superbowl

Well, if we name that bus driver Jerome Bettis, then we have ourselves a joke. Albeit it kinda lame, but better than I did. :) Ben Doom wrote: > There once was a man who drove his VW van everywhere again and again. > He was a universal serial bus driver. > > --Ben "crammed it" Doom > > Ray C

  1   2   3   >