On 6/12/06, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We did? Are you sure about that?
On May 17, 2001 Secretary of State Colin Powell announced a gift of
$43 million to the Taliban as a purported reward for its eradication
of Afghanistan's opium crop this February. That, in effect, made the
U.S. the Talib
Miss me?
-Original Message-
From: Zaphod Beeblebrox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 4:16 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: HOLY SHIT Ben Roethlisberger
hey Jillian's back!
~|
Message: http://www.
Nah. After dealing with Nixon from 68 to 74, putting up with Shrub is
doable. And I can always cut and paste my opinion. I don't have to
type it each time. It's just sad to see otherwise seemingly
intelligent people so caught up in Shrub's web of deceit. I wear my
neck muscles out shaking my h
I've taken the safety courses and such --and you are right. With the right
gear and some common sense, you stand a very good chance of survival.
For every 'bad motorcycle accident' story, I've got at LEAST one horrible
car accident story.
My biggest thought if my bike goes down is to get my le
Wow, only a Moore worshiper could fall for that. Our government, under
Clinton was trying to negotiate with the Taliban to give up there evil
ways in exchange for a pipeline that would make them fortunes and you
tie it to Bush because he was governor of Texas and Unocal is from
Texas? Unocal is inv
haha, apparently i can't count, make that 31 months. sorry to tease you, it
must seem like eternity now!
On 6/12/06, Robert wrote:
>
> by my count you have about nineteen months left. good luck. ;-)
>
> On 6/12/06, Maureen wrote:
>
> > If Bush,or his supporters, continue to claim a mandate for hi
by my count you have about nineteen months left. good luck. ;-)
On 6/12/06, Maureen wrote:
>
> If Bush,or his supporters, continue to claim a mandate for his actions
> by claiming he was elected by the American people, then I claim the
> right to continue to remind them that they are wrong. For a
+1 that is way, way over the line Dana.
Do we grind up their bones and use it for soap, I suppose? Do we starve them
half to death and then gas them? Do we cart them off in cattle cars for mass
extermination? No. We give them clean living conditions, three square meals,
religious materials. What w
The title is "Terror Links to Saddam's Inner Circle"
It's about Saddam working with the Taliban to attack Americans and
American interests. The connection to al Qaeda is mentioned but that's
not the main point of this article.
On 6/12/06, Robert Everland III wrote:
>This article does nothing excep
He should have never gotten on a motorcycle. Not because of the danger of
motorcycles, because of what he has at stake. All those players riding
around in Hummers and Escalades have the right idea. They can ride
motorcyles and learn to BASE jump once they retire.
On 6/12/06, Jillian wrote:
>
> Wh
NOTE: Corrected data structure sent to you offlist
Maureen
On 6/12/06, Maureen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does a job have multiple locations? if so, you need a separate child
> table for the locations. If not, you can have job info and location
> info in the same table and your data structur
Does a job have multiple locations? if so, you need a separate child
table for the locations. If not, you can have job info and location
info in the same table and your data structure would be:
Parts
part id
other part fields
Jobs
job id
location
other job info
PartsJobs
part id
> Weegs wrote:
> No idea, Im dying to get a bike and every story like this puts me one
> step farther away.
>
I'd love one too, but won't for the same reasons you aren't. I've
decided to take out my need for speed in a car and, honestly, that's
where my main interest is anyway.
I think it depend
When the official game clock exists only on my wrist, who's to say
whether it kills time or not? If a team is down by one and is doing
it to try to move upfield faster than they would otherwise, then I
suppose it might. However, if someone is *trying* to burn seconds,
then the ref might take note
I actually bought this one:
http://www.logitech.com/index.cfm/products/details/US/EN,CRID=2225,CONTENTID=6951
I didn't get rumble because ... um ... I don't like it, and don't
generally pay for options I don't want if I can help it. :-)
I'm liking the feel so far. :-)
--Ben
On 6/12/06, Jim Da
hey now! Don't diss my beloved underscores. They're on the keyboard
for a reason! Actually, I've taken a liking to the way you name stuff
in ruby and that's a bleedover.
Back to the problem at handFirst off this was an access database
that was originally all in one table :) I've split it o
Well, what do you expect from a man who was raised by Democratic liberals?
;-\
On 6/12/06, Howie Hamlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's one:
>
> http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2006/06/10/fallen_star_blames_self_gop_tactics/
>
> I'm sure there are others...
Yep, for most people. other drivers are the problem. For some people,
especially ones with racing bikes that could run a moto-gp race today,
they are the problem.
Without a helmet, you don't need to worry about the neck.
With a helmet and decent jacket (and riding pants and boots and
lay-down pegs
Here's one:
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2006/06/10/fallen_star_blames_self_gop_tactics/
I'm sure there are others...
--- On Monday, June 12, 2006 8:30 PM, deadcityskin scribed: ---
>
> What was the law that was broken in order to give Bush the win?
>
> See that's wher
I heard a guy on the Dan Patrick show today, on his daily 1-4 ESPN
Radio Show, *yes
just a couple hours after I heard Big Ben talking on the Mike and Mike
show with Erik
Kuselias (standing in for Mike Greenberg) and Mike Golic* anyway, this
guy emails the
show and states something to the effect of
One vote per tax dollar paid. You think Gates pays a billion dollars in taxes?
On 6/12/06, deadcityskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One vote per dollar?
>
> So Bill (you know, Microsoft) gets a billion votes?
>
> Do you really mean that, to be honest I'm warming to the idea.
~~~
One vote per dollar?
So Bill (you know, Microsoft) gets a billion votes?
Do you really mean that, to be honest I'm warming to the idea.
> -Original Message-
> From: Maureen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 7:29 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: So, does anyone s
I happen to hate the accursed underscore, and only used it to conform to his
naming convention.
Great choice :)
> -Original Message-
> From: Duane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 7:02 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: stupid table name question
>
>
> Depends on
If it's a relational table between Parts and Job I would call it
PartsJob, although if the Job table contains location info, I might be
inclined to name it Location instead of Job, and the third table would
be PartsLocation.
On 6/12/06, Zaphod Beeblebrox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm having a
More corrupt than now? How?
On 6/12/06, deadcityskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wow, you want to talk about a surefire scheme for government corruption.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Maureen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > I think it is a bad artifact of the past and should be ab
My opinion, based on extensive reading of a variety of sources, is
that both the 2000 and 2004 elections were rife with election fraud.
Election fraud is a crime at best and coup at worst. This not an
opinion that I came to lightly, and certainly not based simply on
leftist propaganda and spin.
> Jerry wrote:
> With the every day sacrifices that many Americans make to put food on
> their table, the idea that he couldn't wear a helmet, or even stop
> riding, is going to be the focus in people's minds.
>
In his defense I was fairly rebellious when I was his age too and I'm
sure when things
Depends on your naming conventions but I would use PartLocation
Duane
> -Original Message-
> From: Zaphod Beeblebrox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 6:09 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: stupid table name question
>
>
> I'm having a brain fart naming some tables.
> tBone wrote:
> So accusing a man of sending thousands of men, boys really, to their deaths
> for a personal gain motive isn't vindictive?
>
It may be, but it's attacking policy first and the person second.
Moreover, Bush is a policy maker. While I'm not in favor of the
personal attack, Bush is
> Same wrote:
> We did? Are you sure about that?
> Taliban and al Qaeda were related as the article points out.
>
They're not any more related than Bush and the Taliban who was plenty
cozy with them in 1997. Maybe then Gov. Bush was secretly meeting
with them to discuss terrorism against America?
Still, not illegal.
I'm looking for USC, or even Florida state law that was violated.
> -Original Message-
> From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 6:15 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?
>
>
> hmmm. I have se
part_locations?
> -Original Message-
> From: Zaphod Beeblebrox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 6:09 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: stupid table name question
>
>
> I'm having a brain fart naming some tables. I've got a "job" table
> with details about the locat
No, I didn't put all in front of it.
You did.
All I said was ALL voters were American.
Bush won.
Americans voted for him.
Americans elected bush.
See how that works out?
> -Original Message-
> From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 5:55 PM
> To: CF
Umm,
You mean Osama?
Taliban, was in Afghanistan.
Just wondering, do you often spout off about things you obviously know
nothing about?
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Everland III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 2:40 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Terr
Wow, you want to talk about a surefire scheme for government corruption.
> -Original Message-
> From: Maureen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I think it is a bad artifact of the past and should be abolished
> forthwith. My ideal voting system would be one vote for each tax
> dollar paid an
Concentration camps?
Wow, there's a loaded word Dana.
Concentration camps, with good food and health care and all kinds of shit
right.
No one noticed that we had ovens yet right?
> -Original Message-
> From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 2:56 PM
>
How #upper("exactly")# did he lose the election?
> -Original Message-
> From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 2:40 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?
>
>
> ok well if we aren't talking about the *election*
They aren't Americans.
They don't have, shouldn't have a voice, as far as I am concerned.
Their governments can speak on their behalf's through their ambassadors.
That's the way it works.
Remember when Powers was shot down.
Was he held as a prisoner of war?
No, there was no war.
Should the r
Nah the team is ok.
The ratings are really retarded, only taking into account recent games, and
we've been playing losers.
> -Original Message-
> From: Sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 1:39 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: USA 0 - CZE 2
>
>
> I did just read
What part of the constitution was violated?
I know the document pretty well, and I am failing to see it.
> -Original Message-
> From: Maureen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 2:23 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Is Coulter somehow related to Robertson?
>
>
>
I'd go with the Bush and the Limbaugh.
Don't know enough about Delay to vote.
Tim
> -Original Message-
> From: Sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 1:36 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Is Coulter somehow related to Robertson?
>
>
> Of the Fifty-nine Deceits,
What was the law that was broken in order to give Bush the win?
See that's where your argument breaks down.
Do you really think that the democrats wouldn't have grabbed onto something
with which to impeach this monkey by now?
I'm not saying you shouldn't say what you believe, or trying to attack
Who elected him then?
Tim
> -Original Message-
> From: Maureen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 1:23 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?
>
>
> He didn't say Bush won, he said the people elected him, which is a
> patently fa
Ok,
So accusing a man of sending thousands of men, boys really, to their deaths
for a personal gain motive isn't vindictive?
Accusing him of having sold his country to the Saudis?
Moore is a fool.
Coulter, Rush, Bill O'Jackass.
They are all the same. They pander to their specific demographic.
Yes, they are both Red Herrings.
Argue that the system's broken, not that legitimate results based on
the system are a party problem or a specific candidate problem.
-Cameron
On 6/12/06, Maureen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, you're right, of course, and that's what I meant to say.
> However,
hmmm. I have seen an argument that it second-guessed a Florida state court on a
matter of Florida case law. This would not seem to be a healthy implementation
of federalism, if true.
Dana
>Yes, it complied in every way with the system.
>
>The system may be broken, but it jerked and started to a
> While the judiciary is part of our system of government
Yes, it is. The system.
> Or is the claim that the 2000 election conformed in every way with the
> system?
The system include how the government deals with exceptions and events
not explicitly planned for.
-Cameron
Yes, it complied in every way with the system.
The system may be broken, but it jerked and started to a decision
based on the rules and players at the time.
On 6/12/06, Maureen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While the judiciary is part of our system of government, The Supreme
> Court is not usually
I'm having a brain fart naming some tables. I've got a "job" table
with details about the location at which the equipment is installed.
I've got a "parts" table that lists all the parts that can be
installed at a location. Now, I can't figure out what to call the 3rd
table. "Installed_parts" ?
ok the Kerry campaign was calling people to ask if they knew where their
precinct was and if the person had any questions. Large numbers of people did
not know where their precinct was and therefore you told them. Many many people
where given misinformation about polling places and hours of oper
Are you trying to argue that a plurality should decide the presidency?
Or are you trying to say that the electoral college did not elect bush?
Or that the electoral college did not vote for who they were supposed to?
Or that the correct people were not sent to the electoral college?
Because these
While the judiciary is part of our system of government, The Supreme
Court is not usually involved in decisions regarding Presidential
Elections, nor are the district and state courts in Florida. Or is
the claim that the 2000 election conformed in every way with the
system?
On 6/12/06, Cameron Ch
Yes, you're right, of course, and that's what I meant to say.
However, Bush did not even win by a plurality in 2000, so discussing
whether or not Clinton won is definitely one of Cameron's red
herrings.
On 6/12/06, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A simple majority would be 50.1% of the
thanks.
>Nice, compare Abu Ghraib to the concentration camps. Good work.
>
>On 6/12/06, Dana Tierney wrote:
>> Yeah, we send Arabs to concentration camps, not Jews.
>>
>> > Well the Germans and Italians I spoke to say America today is nothing
>> > like it was then. They were even shocked at the
sorry, someone was yelling in my other ear when I wrote that. Let me try to be
clearer without dragging Venn diagrams into it.
you seem to be saying
Voters elect an election winner
All voters are American
Therefore Bush (an election winner) was elected by all Americans.
Negative. All voters
It is true that the country is unlikely to improve anything while the members
of each party are demonizing the members of the other. That said, Bush... well.
If I said he was the worst thing to happen in the country in years, this would
be an understatement, in my opinion.
But ok, he can't run
despite your salary she is right about the fallacy -- though I differ somewhat
it my opinions from hers.
Do it with Venn diagrams and you will see it. Your logic only holds if you put
ALL in front of A and B. And at that point you have a clearly false, if
logically valid, statement.
Dana
>O
>took me a long time to realize that her lips werent synchronized with
>the singing..
I never noticedI couldn't keep my eyes off her ! and then it took
quite a while to realise that the flash clip was looping and that there was no
end to it!
(That makes me so happy. Thanks Charlie)
On 6/12/06, Charlie Griefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (startlingly) :D
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:208955
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists
hey Jillian's back!
On 6/12/06, Jillian Koskie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What really bothers me is that he's going to become the poster child for
> 'motorcycles are dangerous'.
>
> The man was riding a Hayabusa --one of the fastest street legal motorcycles
> out there... WITHOUT A HELMET.
>
> I
(startlingly) :D
On 6/12/06, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I never claimed NOT to be a pedant.
>
> (Which should be startling obvious)
>
> On 6/12/06, Maureen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > When all else fails, correct their spelling. ;0
> >
> > On 6/12/06, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROT
They didn't make it up, but somebody sure did.
And very very long after the fact too!
*chuckle*
On 6/12/06, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We did? Are you sure about that?
> Taliban and al Qaeda were related as the article points out.
>
> Fox news is reporting on the Foreign Military Studies O
Actually, the Ghanan goalie had some great play today, and there were
just a couple of bobbles by the defense.
On 6/12/06, Vivec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ouch..3-0. Yes, the US was ranked fairly high to have not managed a goal.
>
> I'd have liked to see the match though, since the stats show t
Ouch..3-0. Yes, the US was ranked fairly high to have not managed a goal.
I'd have liked to see the match though, since the stats show that
several Czech players were awarded cards for unsportsmanlinke
behaviour as well as one card for Time wasting.
Why they would be wasting time when they were 2
What Jerry said.
-Cameron
On 6/12/06, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A simple majority would be 50.1% of the vote or higher.
>
> He won with just a plurality.
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i
The Judicial Branch is part of the current system.
-Cameron
On 6/12/06, Maureen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For starters, my initial comment was a correction to someone who said
> that the American people elected Bush. It wasn't a red herring, or a
> misleading generalization. it was a startm
anyone have a role based permission ftp app?
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.8.3/361 - Release Date: 6/11/2006
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.
I never claimed NOT to be a pedant.
(Which should be startling obvious)
On 6/12/06, Maureen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When all else fails, correct their spelling. ;0
>
> On 6/12/06, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You can call it a fact all day, but that does not make it so.
> >
When all else fails, correct their spelling. ;0
On 6/12/06, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You can call it a fact all day, but that does not make it so.
> (and fwiw, it's judiciary)
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusi
A simple majority would be 50.1% of the vote or higher.
He won with just a plurality.
On 6/12/06, Maureen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Which shows a simply majority for Clinton in each case.
>
> On 6/12/06, Howie Hamlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 1992:
> >
> > Clinton 43%
> > Bush 37.4%
> > P
You can call it a fact all day, but that does not make it so.
(and fwiw, it's judiciary)
The supreme court IS part of the system we have in place, as are the
election officials.
On 6/12/06, Maureen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> He wasn't even elected by the system we
> "have in place". He was put
Which shows a simply majority for Clinton in each case.
On 6/12/06, Howie Hamlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1992:
>
> Clinton 43%
> Bush 37.4%
> Perot 18.9%
>
> 1996:
>
> Clinton 49.2%
> Dole 40.7%
> Perot 8.4%
>
> Electoral
>
>
> 1992:
>
> Clinton 370
> Bush 168
> Perot 0
>
> 1996:
>
> Clinton
> -Original Message-
> From: Deanna Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 9:53 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Interface Review, Anybody?
>
> Um, unless I get to enter some sort of search string, I'd call this
> more of a guided browse type interface than a
I think it is going to be a smaller set than that.
I think it is all going to fall into the "professional athletes think
the rules don't apply to them".
For many people, the amount of money he stands to lose is like
carelessly dropping the winning lottery ticket on the way to cash it
in.
With th
For starters, my initial comment was a correction to someone who said
that the American people elected Bush. It wasn't a red herring, or a
misleading generalization. it was a startment of fact. The majority
of the American People did not vote for Bush. Not even the majority
of the voters voted
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Munn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 12:33 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: HOLY SHIT Ben Roethlisberger
>
> wow, that really sucks, but this accident begs the question- when are pro
> athletes going to learn that:
>
> 1. the
i don't think that'll happen. i think he'll be the poster child for
idiots who ride motorcycles without appropriate gear...but i don't
think it'll be motorcycles in general.
On 6/12/06, Jillian Koskie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What really bothers me is that he's going to become the poster chil
> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Doom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 11:06 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Game Pad
>
> So we have two votes for my non-existant PS2 controller...
I'm sorry - bad wording.
I meant that Logitech made the same pad (essentially)
What really bothers me is that he's going to become the poster child for
'motorcycles are dangerous'.
The man was riding a Hayabusa --one of the fastest street legal motorcycles
out there... WITHOUT A HELMET.
I'd love to know what he was wearing too... Ie. Appropriate gear otherwise.
I'm sorr
ok that was good :)
On 6/12/06, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, if it turns out he needs a jaw transplant, his coach has plenty to
> spare.
>
> (Sorry)
>
> On 6/12/06, Crow T. Robot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well, the good thing about that quote is this:
> >
> > "and only 's
Well, if it turns out he needs a jaw transplant, his coach has plenty to spare.
(Sorry)
On 6/12/06, Crow T. Robot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, the good thing about that quote is this:
>
> "and only 'some' knee damage. That timeline would have Roethlisberger
> back before the end of training
Well, the good thing about that quote is this:
"and only 'some' knee damage. That timeline would have Roethlisberger
back before the end of training camp."
While I don't know about the timeline comment, if his knees are OK,
that's great. I'm looking forward to many intense battles on the field
i can't find the page that i originally copied from, but did find this one:
http://www.rotoworld.com/content/playerpages/playerbreakingnews.asp?sport=NFL&id=1181&line=68482&spln=1
quotes the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
On 6/12/06, Crow T. Robot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wow. I didn't read that.
Debating the electoral college and the current system of electing a
president it one thing. Making wild and misleading generalisations
like "the president wasn't elected" is generally used as a Red Herring
designed to make the debate about Bush and and Left vs Right rather
than the electoral colle
Yeah. How about them Red Sox?
On 6/12/06, Crow T. Robot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Football.
>
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:208929
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Su
And soccer
(which isn't the same thing at all)
On 6/12/06, Crow T. Robot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Football.
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:208928
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/th
Football.
Maureen wrote:
> If the integrity of elections isn't up for debate, then when what you
> consider an important enough topic to discuss?
>
> On 6/12/06, Cameron Childress <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This (IMHO) is one of the arguments that both those on the "Left" and
>> "Right" would
If the integrity of elections isn't up for debate, then when what you
consider an important enough topic to discuss?
On 6/12/06, Cameron Childress <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This (IMHO) is one of the arguments that both those on the "Left" and
> "Right" would love for us to buisilly continue to
Only three people, other than Shrub, have lost the popular vote and
and won the electoral vote:
John Q. Adams, Rutherford B. Hayes, and Benjamin Harrison
http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/electoral-college/scores.html
On 6/12/06, John Galt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What presidents HAV
1992:
Clinton 43%
Bush 37.4%
Perot 18.9%
1996:
Clinton 49.2%
Dole 40.7%
Perot 8.4%
Electoral
1992:
Clinton 370
Bush 168
Perot 0
1996:
Clinton 379
Dole 159
Perot 0
--- On Monday, June 12, 2006 4:55 PM, Maureen scribed: ---
>
> Why would it hold true for Clinton? In what universe did he no
OK, Prof.
How?
Dead City Skinhead (G.E.D. Graduate making 6 figures)
> -Original Message-
> From: Maureen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 4:52 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?
>
> No. Your entire post is a logical fall
Thats better than most of the quarterbacks in the league at the moment...
On 6/12/06, Crow T. Robot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Awake, alert, aware of his situation, surroundings.
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.c
This (IMHO) is one of the arguments that both those on the "Left" and
"Right" would love for us to buisilly continue to waste our energy
endlessly debating while they continue to merrily flush our money down
the shitter. It's one of the "why the other team is evil" arguments
when we should be talk
Wow. I didn't read that. Got a link?
Charlie Griefer wrote:
> not sure it's been posted yet to this thread...but i just read this:
>
> Roethlisberger lost most of his teeth, fractured his left sinus cavity
> bone, suffered a nine-inch laceration to the back of his head and a
> broken jaw, and s
Why would it hold true for Clinton? In what universe did he not have
the majority of the popular vote?
On 6/12/06, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So the same holds true for Clinton?
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Maureen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, June 12,
not sure it's been posted yet to this thread...but i just read this:
Roethlisberger lost most of his teeth, fractured his left sinus cavity
bone, suffered a nine-inch laceration to the back of his head and a
broken jaw, and severely injured both of his knees when he hit the
ground, police said.
T
G.W Bush got greater than 50%. Reagan got greater than 50%
> -Original Message-
> From: John Galt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 4:47 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: So, does anyone still trust these guys?
>
> What presidents HAVE won the popular election?
>
New report: Angered New England Patriots fan tries to take out Big Ben
in PA:
" Reports added that a car, with Maine license plates, was traveling in
the opposite direction of Roethlisberger's motorcycle and turned left.
Roethlisberger was unable to stop and the motorcycle hit the passenger
s
No. Your entire post is a logical fallacy.
Maureen
(former logic professor)
On 6/12/06, John Galt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok.
>
> Let's do this logically.
>
> There was an election.
>
> It had one winner.
>
> The people that voted in that election were American (we hope).
>
> There was a wi
On 6/12/06, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Of all the things I have ever read in an email, calling George Bush
> "my guy" has to be the funniest. *chuckle*
Well, if you aren't a Bush fan, you're certainly giving a good
impersonation of one.
> I feel that I lost in having to choose bet
1 - 100 of 266 matches
Mail list logo
