The other side only wants Israel dead so it's a choice between diplomacy
which gives them time to attack again (and they have and will) or mass
death. The key is directing the mass death to Hizballah rather than to
everyone. Bottom line is that its either Hizballah mass death or Israel's
mass d
> Sam wrote:
> Who can put a price on freedom and security?
Random thought: How much of your money is Iran a threat? Are you
willing, today, to commit say %25 of your income to the fight? If not
that, then what? More? Less?
Given that, how much was Hussein worth? 50%? 75% You say you can't
Well, no, the NSA stuff we know about, they want access to it all, and
if they don't have direct access to it, then the company providing the
service must be able to provide a record of who and when.
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Tangorre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, Jul
Uh, when did I say I was cool with the NSA doing it?
> -Original Message-
> From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2006 10:11 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: google is scary
>
> actually what I find a bit odd is that you don't want Google doing it,
but
> NSA
Exactly. Face it, all our information is in more places than we could ever
know about...
From: "Dana" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> actually what I find a bit odd is that you don't want Google doing it, but
> NSA -- that's just fine by you...
~~
actually what I find a bit odd is that you don't want Google doing it, but
NSA -- that's just fine by you...
Dana
On 7/29/06, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Right cause worrying about a company that keeps track of everything
> people write, and read about, and then sell ads based on
wow Mike, why mince words? tell us how you really feel ;)
On 7/29/06, Mike Tangorre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Don't be such a pussy.
>
>
>
> From: "Nick McClure" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >I don't really like google. I like the search engine, but I don't like
> > gmail, and I don't really trust t
Right cause worrying about a company that keeps track of everything
people write, and read about, and then sell ads based on that is odd.
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Tangorre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2006 10:03 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: google i
Don't be such a pussy.
From: "Nick McClure" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>I don't really like google. I like the search engine, but I don't like
> gmail, and I don't really trust them, at all
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quart
> Sam wrote:
> Who can put a price on freedom and security?
::sigh:: Iraq had absolutely nothing to do with that.
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information
hehe --- there is a google calculator answer ;)
On 7/29/06, Zaphod Beeblebrox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> just out of curiousity, I asked google "what is the answer to life the
> universe and everything?"
>
> you'll never guess what it replied with
>
>
> On 7/29/06, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
a towel?
On 7/29/06, Zaphod Beeblebrox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> just out of curiousity, I asked google "what is the answer to life the
> universe and everything?"
>
> you'll never guess what it replied with
>
>
> On 7/29/06, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > mm it's a bit startling. I am l
what do you mean paranoia -- those people in the black helicopters sent you
didn't they?
On 7/29/06, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> google is fine. paranoia on the otherhand is a motherfucker.
>
>
>
> On 7/29/06, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > mm it's a bit startling. I am looking at th
google is fine. paranoia on the otherhand is a motherfucker.
On 7/29/06, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mm it's a bit startling. I am looking at the links though and they are right
> on target. Once I get used to the idea I might find this a useful feature...
> it's a bit like asking the big
saved in the same way andrea yates saved her children
On 7/29/06, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> please define saved?
>
> On 7/29/06, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Matt.
> >
> > I'm still in the camp that thinks Saddam was a threat. My point was
> > people are arguning 30k or
just out of curiousity, I asked google "what is the answer to life the
universe and everything?"
you'll never guess what it replied with
On 7/29/06, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mm it's a bit startling. I am looking at the links though and they are right
> on target. Once I get used to the
mm it's a bit startling. I am looking at the links though and they are right
on target. Once I get used to the idea I might find this a useful feature...
it's a bit like asking the big computer in the sky for an answer to my
research question though.
On 7/29/06, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
I don't really like google. I like the search engine, but I don't like
gmail, and I don't really trust them, at all
> -Original Message-
> From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2006 3:19 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: google is scary
>
> right after I sent this
right after I sent this gmail started displaying links in my webclips that
apply to my question...
-- Forwarded message --
From: Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Jul 29, 2006 1:05 PM
Subject: more hardware questions
To: CF-Community
If anyone else feels like helping I could use so
I Agree Totally. Time will tell if it was a good move, but we saved a
million Iraqis, and now we've got a military base in the middle east. Damn
good move, IMO.
But then again, I don't ignore that wars happen, and Islamic fundamentalists
want us destroyed. Time will tell, but a major showdow
Who can put a price on freedom and security?
When you claim we destabilized the Mid-East that implies it was stable
before. Is that some sort of sick joke or did you cut history class
that day?
What facts are in?
We're at war with terror and if we just ignore it, like you want us
to, we all die or
the IRA wanted justice, man. I don't excuse them, but they were justified.
And wrong. Which is my point.
On 7/29/06, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> My point is nothing happened to change the hearts and minds of the
> people there. The IRA, which was a small band of terrorist, wanted
> good jo
If anyone else feels like helping I could use some more ideas -- can always
use ideas -- on hardware. Right now I am looking for
1) Clients - thin clients specifically not ruled out - these need to be very
simple and robust, will be used by young children
2) need very high graphics capability. Am
My point is nothing happened to change the hearts and minds of the
people there. The IRA, which was a small band of terrorist, wanted
good jobs and got them. Nothing to do with the population and changed
opinions except life is now safer.
On 7/29/06, Dana wrote:
> Perhaps no minds have changed, b
Has diplomacy worked in Israel, Serbia, Rwanda or even Afghanistan?
Did it work with Hitler Musilini or Hirohito?
Now lets look at your crescent, aren't many Middle-East nations
condemning Hezbola? Looks like people in the region are recognizing
the true threat to peace and are starting to stand u
On 7/29/06, Gruss Gott wrote:
> The summary of your point is that you think it's possible to win an
> urban "combatant" war. I don't. We'll find out who's right.
Summary of my point is we have no choice but to win.
> As I pointed out for Iraq - 95% of the people killing Americans are
> Iraqis.
> Sam wrote:
> I'm still in the camp that thinks Saddam was a threat.
The question isn't was he a threat, nor is it did we help the Iraqis.
Rather it's did his level of threat justify the resources expended to
get rid of him? So let's put that question on the table:
Was Hussein a 1 Trillion doll
please define saved?
On 7/29/06, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks Matt.
>
> I'm still in the camp that thinks Saddam was a threat. My point was
> people are arguning 30k or 50k Iraqis died because of this war. Look
> how many we've saved.
Perhaps no minds have changed, but a damn sight fewer of them are dying. I
actually know someonewho moved to Belfast a couple of months ago. Do you
think things like that would happen if there weren't a ceasefire? Yeah
people still nurse their 300 years of grievances but they aren't killing
anyone
Thanks Matt.
I'm still in the camp that thinks Saddam was a threat. My point was
people are arguning 30k or 50k Iraqis died because of this war. Look
how many we've saved.
On 7/28/06, Chesty Puller wrote:
> Sam, you summed it up right nice.
>
> On one of your points, I happen to be one of those p
> Sam wrote:
> Are they sweet innocent Iraqi's or Ba'ath party loyalists? Many people
> are claiming we should have left Saddam
Dude, I hate have to break this to you, but the time for opinions on
Iraq is over as the facts are in. The Bush justification (if you
ignore the WMD lies and misdirectio
My old boss was a stickler for the AP style book. Get that book, and you'll
never make another grammar mistake again. Like time stamps as one example.
it's "a.m. p.m." NOT AM PM at best you could use A.M. P.M.
--
Casey Dougall
Web Applications Developer
Ph: 518 743-9424 Fax: 743-0337
Mannix Mar
> Sam wrote:
> Let's think back to WWII again and use your philosophy.
> We'd be dead.
>
The summary of your point is that you think it's possible to win an
urban "combatant" war. I don't. We'll find out who's right.
As I pointed out for Iraq - 95% of the people killing Americans are
Iraqis. T
33 matches
Mail list logo
