> Maureen wrote:
> Heartbreaking. Absolutely heartbreaking. The caption doesn't make
> much sense though. Why would it matter if the number of soldiers
> equaled the number of 9/11 victims?
Well, I think the point is terrorists killed X number of Americans and
now our response has killed X numb
Heartbreaking. Absolutely heartbreaking. The caption doesn't make
much sense though. Why would it matter if the number of soldiers
equaled the number of 9/11 victims? I fail to see any way that should
matter, unless it's just to show that the enemy has doubled their
death toll.
On 9/22/06, Gru
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/060922/480/5ae0f6e9ccf245c9b29f387585e93d9a
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to you
> RoMunn wrote:
> What a victory- the Hezbollah stronghold of southern Beirut in rubble, the
> south of the country occupied by UN and Lebanese troops, supplies from his
> Iranian patrons strangled by the Israeli military, and absolutely nothing to
> show for it.
>
That's pretty myopic. To arabs,
What a victory- the Hezbollah stronghold of southern Beirut in rubble, the
south of the country occupied by UN and Lebanese troops, supplies from his
Iranian patrons strangled by the Israeli military, and absolutely nothing to
show for it.
On 9/22/06, Gruss wrote:
>
> Bush has Bin Laden and Olmert
My next vacation!
Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 4:46 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: SCUBA Fans: The Ultimate Hotel
For the first time in history an authentic underwater research habitat
is open to the average person-
For the first time in history an authentic underwater research habitat
is open to the average person--sport divers and even those who have
never before dived. And although Jules' still functions as a research
lab, you will be pleased to know that it has air-conditioning, hot
showers, stereo music,
When I get to be president, I'm putting Sam in charge of the
Department of Hyperbole and Melodrama I don't think I've heard so
many red herrings in one paragraph since the last time I listened to
Austin Lounge Lizard sing Teenage Immigrant Welfare Mothers on Drugs.
..
On 9/22/06, Sam <[EMAIL PRO
in my best Homer voice.
"Hmmm. mm. 'to liquefy your bones!...?'
On 9/22/06, ben.doom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm sorry. Was that not the correct response to weapons that create
> temperatures hot enough to liquefy your bones?
>
> Please advise.
>
> --Ben
>
> loathe wrote:
> > E.
I'm sorry. Was that not the correct response to weapons that create
temperatures hot enough to liquefy your bones?
Please advise.
--Ben
loathe wrote:
> E.
>
> Dude?
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: ben.doom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 9:56 PM
>
Bush has Bin Laden and Olmert has Nasrallah:
When Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah appeared in public after two months in
hiding, it was to the rapturous chants of several hundred thousand of
the party faithful.
The leader of Hezbollah had ignored repeated threats against his life
> gMoney wrote:
> Paid $2.01 last night. Thought it wasn't sposed to hit 2 till Thanksgiving?
> These lower gas prices are greatI'm voting Republican
>
Burning gas RULES! Burn it, BURN IT!! BURN!
//grabs keys, heads for garage
~~~
> Sam wrote:
> Good advice but I can't do it. I've been dirt poor before and won't
> mind being that way again. But while the money's coming in I like to
> enjoy. Not to say I'm not trying, the whole American dream thing makes
> it hard.
>
With that piece of the puzzle I'd offer that you're fiscal
> Sam wrote:
> My real curiosity is I don't really understand the labels. I'm all
> over the spectrum normally and find it hard to find a label that
> applies most of the time. I guess I can use Bush supporter and
> Dittohead :)
>
If I may, I would offer that you're a social conservative which is
Good advice but I can't do it. I've been dirt poor before and won't
mind being that way again. But while the money's coming in I like to
enjoy. Not to say I'm not trying, the whole American dream thing makes
it hard.
On 9/22/06, Gruss Gott wrote:
> Here's a couple of good rules of thumb we use for
> Sam wrote:
> I have a plan. Stop sending out the notices telling people how much to
> expect when they retire. I always assumed I was on my own until I
> started getting these notices. I'm almost up to $3k a month when I
> figured it would be a couple hundred.. Makes me think I don't have to
> sa
>$1.95 is the lowest I've seen.
>
>$2.04 is pretty common, but I get it for $1.94 with my Kroger Plus Card
>
$1.99 to $2.55 in my part of Northern Virginia
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hit
$2.05
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly
Archive:
Not really, if we're using liberal as a classification it has to have
some commonality. I'm just guessing, or trying to understand what it
is.
On 9/22/06, Gruss Gott wrote:
For example - with the nambla issue, that should be banned as that
information serves no useful legal purpose. That being s
Well what do you think Clintons comment was?
If we're dishing it out...
Republican Congress who dinged him for taking action
What action? A few bombs here and there?
On 9/22/06, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> That's a rhetorical/partisan argument from my perspective. Pres
> Clinton was just as concerned
> RoMunn wrote:
> Not just Clinton, every President and Congress for the last thirty plus
> years
> And screw those Lincoln-driving Social Security-dependent boomers- they can
> drive Kia's and eat Ramen noodles
DUDE! He shoots, he scores!
> Sam wrote:
> If that were the case I would have said: "human-animal weddings"
> The Namba issue is a real issue that I thought all liberals,
> especially elitist ones, supported for the civil liberties aspect
Anytime you finding statements like "all liberals believe ..." you
should remember tha
> Sam wrote:
> What was his philosophy? Terrorism is nothing to worry about, it'll
> just go away.
>
That's a rhetorical/partisan argument from my perspective. Pres
Clinton was just as concerned as everyone else on terrorism and even
more so than the Republican Congress who dinged him for taking
We will not bring up the subject of sheep again. Ever.
On 9/22/06, Erika L. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Neigh.
>
> Getting chilly here, where's my sweater?
>
> ##| -Original Message-
> ##| From: Todd Ashworth
> ##|
> ##| Nuke!
> ##|
> ##| Surprise!
> ##|
> ##| Todd
>
On 9/22/06, Jerry Barnes wrote:
> Ahhh. See. This is an example of a concrete plan. I don't think it
> would get you or anyone elected to office or keep an office, but at
> least it is a plan. That is what the Democrats are missing. Concrete
> ideas.
I have a plan. Stop sending out the notic
If that were the case I would have said: "human-animal weddings"
The Namba issue is a real issue that I thought all liberals,
especially elitist ones, supported for the civil liberties aspect. I
guess I could have started with your questions and worked my way up to
the BIG question. But I don't lik
> Social Security, as a program, isn't broken at all. It's the
> uneducated voters and, through them, Congress that's broken. Had
> Congress not left the SS fund full of IOUs there'd be no problem.
>
I can buy that. Alas, due to their greediness, the system cannot
continue to work as it is. So
> I say the exact opposite - it's "elitist" that's meant to say,
> "they're our of touch and don't understand you but I'm a normal Joe
> just like you."
I can agree that elitist is meant to imply "they're out of touch and
don't understand ..." but I still think the liberal label is more
damning.
> Nah, just tired of you jumping in my face all the time for unrelated
> reasons.
Ah I see. But Sam, _you_ brought the book into the discussion. And you
did it as an alarmist argument.
> I thought I was asking valid questions and I did receive good
> answers that cleared things up for me.
I thin
John: "What is the column 'InStock' used for?"
Jack: "Easy, if the item is in stock, it is marked with an 'X'. If not,
then it is empty"
John: "But the column is set up with the data type 'text'"
Jack: "So..."
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
still... better than the $3.00+ it was going for in So Cal 2 weeks ago :)
On 9/22/06, Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> $2.69 in Southern California.. give or take.
>
> Oh.. and there are about 4 refineries within 30 miles of me house
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Nick McClure [mailto:[E
Or text fields to hold a 100 char or less title?
Or a state field that is char, 3 wide?
On 9/22/06, Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes.. but for some reason, I love laughing at those when I seem them.
>
> I guess it is my comic relief...
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Tangorre [m
Nah, just tired of you jumping in my face all the time for unrelated
reasons. I thought I was asking valid questions and I did receive good
answers that cleared things up for me. Your response was both annoying
and expected. But I'm not really in a fighting mood, high holidays and
all that starting
$2.69 in Southern California.. give or take.
Oh.. and there are about 4 refineries within 30 miles of me house
-Original Message-
From: Nick McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 9:34 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Gas at $2
That may be part of it, what ab
Yes.. but for some reason, I love laughing at those when I seem them.
I guess it is my comic relief...
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tangorre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 8:30 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Hmm...
From: "Jacob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> How
We don't have to:
If you look closely at the annual letter you receive from the Social
Security Administration, you will see that the benefits you've been
buying with your payroll taxes are only "scheduled." That's a fancy
word for maybe. The federal government can revoke them at will,
according t
> You tell me Billy boy. Does it?
Haven't seen the book Sam. Don't care to. If it gets published, I
won't buy it, nor I think, will any of the people I associate with.
Personally i think NAMBLA is reprehensible, I don't support their
organization, nor do I support their stated goals.
Do you feel
Not just Clinton, every President and Congress for the last thirty plus
years has known this problem was coming, and they either ignored it or
failed to get anything passed to deal with it. I primarily blame Congress,
esp. the House, for this mess.
And screw those Lincoln-driving Social Security-d
You tell me Billy boy. Does it?
Try to follow along, we're talking aboput Liberals, social and elites.
All liberals seem to support the ACLU and the fight for NAMBLA to
publish this book.
The argument they use is it's informational the same as bomb making.
So it falls under "Keep the gov't out of
> That may be part of it, what about your gas taxes and other state
> regulation?
We have hefty gas taxes, but, as an example, when we moved to
Washington State from Kansas City, almost nine years ago, gas was only
$.05 higher per gallon, now we're talking $.75... and we've only
increased gas taxe
> But the book is sold to adults not children. Freedom of speach and all that.
Sam, does this fantasy book of your contain pictures of minors?
If so, it involves children and would therefore fall under the "not
legal" category.
I find it interesting that you jump right to Silliness Factor 10 by
> First Maureen, now I'm agreeing with Will..this list has been a bad,
> naughty liberal influence on me!
Well, you're in KC... so you can go watch a rodeo and get all your
conservative values back... you know... big hair, cowboy hats, cruelty
to animals... that sort of stuff!!
;-)
Isn't the
> I'm not interested enough to find the Bush, "I'm not worried about ..." quote.
Is that the "I'm not worried about Bin Laden, I don't lose sleep"
(paraphrased) quote?
That was long after 9/11. He was trying to show that we were in such
control of the situation that he didn't have to worry about
Yeah, Pete Cabrinha is one of the original tow-in surfers who conquered Jaws
ten years ago.
Check this out, it's a video of all the XXL finalists from this year:
http://www.surfline.com/video/vids/2006/mar/xxlbiggest/xxlbiggest_wmp.cfm
On 9/21/06, Gruss wrote:
>
> http://www.billabongxxl.com/
But the book is sold to adults not children. Freedom of speach and all that.
On 9/22/06, Gruss Gott wrote:
> That means, basically, The Golden Rule. So let's take your NAMBLA
> example: that would definitely be illegal to a social liberal because
> it involves minors. This would differ from, say
That may be part of it, what about your gas taxes and other state
regulation?
> -Original Message-
> From: William Bowen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 11:22 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Gas at $2
>
> Still in the $2.70 - $2.90s here in Washington Sta
$1.95 is the lowest I've seen.
$2.04 is pretty common, but I get it for $1.94 with my Kroger Plus Card
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg Morphis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 11:15 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Gas at $2
>
> 2.27 lowest I've seen in
What was his philosophy? Terrorism is nothing to worry about, it'll just go
away.
Why yes that was Bush's philosophy for the first 9 month of his administration
- until the Terrorists attacked.
I'm not interested enough to find the Bush, "I'm not worried about ..." quote.
--
Ian Sk
> tBone wrote:
> Socially liberal to me means that you believe peoples morals are their own
> and shouldn't be the focus of legislation.
>
Hear, hear, that's it. Socially liberal means you want citizens to as
free from legislation (and therefore government) as possible.
That means, basically, Th
You keep blaming the boomers but wasn't it Clinton that took most of
the money and paid of the deficit? The idea was 20 years of booming
economy could easily pay it back.
At least that's the way I remember it.
On 9/22/06, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> He he. No silly. Social liberal means "get the gover
> WillBo wrote:
> > Or we let die in the street.
>
> Um... is this the "social libral" thing you were talking about?
>
He he. No silly. Social liberal means "get the government the hell
out of moral issues like drugs, prostitution, and Gay Marriage".
As for Social Security, if we eliminate bene
Not at all.
Don't be silly. That would be economic liberalism.
Communists tend to involve themselves in every aspect of your life. Gays
and the religious were persecuted in the Soviet Union, and birth control is
enforced in China.
Socially liberal to me means that you believe peoples morals ar
What was his philosophy? Terrorism is nothing to worry about, it'll
just go away.
On 9/22/06, G Money wrote:
> "But the thing that bothers me about having an ideology as opposed to a
> philosophy is that, if you have an ideology, then the outcome is dictated
> before the facts are in, before the a
First Maureen, now I'm agreeing with Will..this list has been a bad,
naughty liberal influence on me!
On 9/22/06, William Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Can I get an amen?
>
> But...but... he got his knob polished in the oval office!!!
>
> I mean... I mean.. how could he have a perspec
Isn't Social Liberalism based on Marxism and Socialism?
The modern ones want the Government to take care of the people that
won't take care of themselves. They do this by taxing the rest. So the
government supports these people and then has to mind their business
in what's being done with it? Like
That's easy. When the Soviet Union collapsed and people figured out that the
socialist ideas and policies of the old Left were bankrupt.
The irony, of course, is that the "compassionate conservatives" are
basically liberals who like guns and religion and dislike abortion.
On 9/22/06, Jerry B wrot
> Can I get an amen?
But...but... he got his knob polished in the oval office!!!
I mean... I mean.. how could he have a perspective on anything that is
worth listening to!?!?
:-P
oh and... AMEN BROTHER!
:-D
--
will
"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unac
> gMoney wrote:
> I don't think W is Catholic. Are you referring to the influence of the RC
> church and/or the Pope???
>
His advisory team is and it's been the basis of his ideological
development. It's the basis for "compassionate conservativism." It
comes from is born again evangelical roots
>> Nick wrote:
>> But based on the two descriptions, they are different, Lucy didn't have the
>> tree climbing upper body they've observed in the latest find.
>>
>
>I thought they both did, but in any event this is part of the debate.
>Why are humans so different and why did they evolve so fast whi
>> Christopher Tolkien has spent 30 years working on The Children of
>> Hurin, which The Lord of the Rings author started in 1918 and later
>> abandoned.
>
>me'thinks there may be a reason it was abandoned... JRR his'own self
>lived a long time ignoring that book :-)
>
If its the part I'm thinking
>God, I love focused nerds.
>
>Love this line:
>
>Bernard Wood ... also agreed that it won't settle the debate among
>scientists, which he said "makes the Middle East look like a picnic."
>
>
>
>On 9/20/06, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
Paleontology is well know for its heated wars. The hi
It's a sad state of affairs that I miss the bastard.
> -Original Message-
> From: G Money [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 11:33 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Clinton's spot-on criticism of Bush
>
> "But the thing that bothers me about having an ideology as
"But the thing that bothers me about having an ideology as opposed to a
philosophy is that, if you have an ideology, then the outcome is dictated
before the facts are in, before the arguments are heard. And that, I think,
can cause problems."
Can I get an amen?
--
"We can sit outside and argue a
> Or we let die in the street.
Um... is this the "social libral" thing you were talking about?
:-P
--
will
"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable."
- Carrie Fisher
~|
Introducing
> Paid $2.01 last night. Thought it wasn't sposed to hit 2 till Thanksgiving?
> These lower gas prices are greatI'm voting Republican
Still in the $2.70 - $2.90s here in Washington State...
But, that couldn't be the gas stations/fuel companies artificially
keeping the prices high in an ef
2.27 lowest I've seen in Little Rock, AR still a lot better than the
2.70+ we were paying just a couple weeks ago
On 9/22/06, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paid $2.01 last night. Thought it wasn't sposed to hit 2 till Thanksgiving?
> These lower gas prices are greatI'm voting Republica
Paid $2.01 last night. Thought it wasn't sposed to hit 2 till Thanksgiving?
These lower gas prices are greatI'm voting Republican
jk :)
--
"We can sit outside and argue all night long, about a God we've never seen,
but who never fails to side with me."
~
Neigh.
Getting chilly here, where's my sweater?
##| -Original Message-
##| From: Todd Ashworth
##|
##| Nuke!
##|
##| Surprise!
##|
##| Todd
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hit
On 9/22/06, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I say the exact opposite - it's "elitist" that's meant to say,
> "they're our of touch and don't understand you but I'm a normal Joe
> just like you."
>
> The addition of liberal is meant to appeal to a particular
> demographic. I don't think l
> Barnes wrote:
> The two choices you listed don't exactly make me jump for joy. To
> fund it, more taxes will be needed. There is enough welfare already.
> SS is a broken system.
Social Security, as a program, isn't broken at all. It's the
uneducated voters and, through them, Congress that's b
> Jerry wrote:
> So, when did liberal become a bad word?
>
I say the exact opposite - it's "elitist" that's meant to say,
"they're our of touch and don't understand you but I'm a normal Joe
just like you."
The addition of liberal is meant to appeal to a particular
demographic. I don't think libe
On 9/22/06, Jerry Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So, when did liberal become a bad word?
The day Rush Windbag signed on the air for his first political broadcast.
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 p
> Social security reform is the biggest populist sham ever invented.
> Anybody that understands the reasoning and economics behind the
> program will tell you there's 2 options:
>
> 1.) Leave it as is and fund it, or
> 2.) Make it Welfare.
>
The two choices you listed don't exactly make me jump fo
Hope the son did a better job than Brian Herbert.
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four
times a year.
http://w
The word liberal is the catch here. No one, including liberals, want
to be labelled liberal anymore. So, if people don't research the
candidates and do remember the liberal elitist catch phrase, then it
will probably help his cause.
So, when did liberal become a bad word?
~~
75 matches
Mail list logo
