> -Original Message-
> From: Duane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 1:36 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Sony Playstation 3 Gets FireFox & Linux
>
> From what I've read, the Sony PS3 will only run on blue laser DVDs. I cant
> remember where I read it, but the
> -Original Message-
> From: Russel Madere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 11:55 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: The Fairness Doctrine
>
> As for the burner, that person can say the same thing without desecrating
> the emblem of our nation. The burning of t
> Larry wrote:
> How about Goerge Bush, better or worse than Millard Filmore, or Which
> President was more effective in office James Buchanan or George Bush?
>
Effective is a good term. Bush has not been effective, but he HAS
tried and HAS done so with gusto. Unlike many political types, he's
Do it at CF United instead, seriously!!
> -Original Message-
> From: Ian Skinner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 4:36 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: VEGAS BABY!
>
>
> so... if I start up a flag burning discussion in the bar at the Venetian
> after sessions.
>What are Intelligent Documents?
>
Didn't Apple try something like this about 8 or 9 years ago?
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, deli
>Have a drink.
>
>On 10/20/06, Larry Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
Actually right now I could go for just burning the developer who wrote that POS
in effigy.
Actually forget the effigy part, I'll just do the burning part tonight.
~~~
>Welcome Oguz.
>
>One quick question:
>
>George Walker Bush. Great President, or Greatest President?
>
>
>On 10/20/06, Robert Munn wrote:
>> Hehe, well said.
>>
>> Oguz, you just got your crash-course introduction to CF-Community. Welcome!
>>
How about Goerge Bush, better or worse than Millard Fil
On 10/20/06, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The snippet you gave us doesn't mention any details about HOW the
> "intelligence" is supposedly induced into these documents in order to make
> them affective.
Quantum mechanics and "Smart Tags" better not be included
On 10/20/06, Donna French <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to install Ubuntu on my 2nd hard drive at home to play with (for now).
> I
> know there's a way to have the system ask which OS to boot, but this is my
> first
> go at this so I'm looking for a little help.
Donna -
Ubuntu will instal
welcome..
space cakes are officially in season.
pulling out a freash pan of brownies..
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to y
if you plan to install on a second drive, usually the installer will just
ask you how you want to install the boot loader. you can have it install a
bootloader in the MBR of the primary disk and configure the bootloader to
launch either your existing OS (presumably Windows) or your Ubuntu OS. The
l
Someone's Marketing department was apparently bored. Either that or they
spent too much time reading Harry Potter.
On 10/20/06, Erika L. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What are Intelligent Documents?
>
> A document is a portable and organised way of presenting information.
> Intelligent Doc
ETHICS TO LIVE BY
by Bill Clinton, with a foreword by Tom Delay
DISASTER PREPAREDNESS
by Kathleen Blanco and Ray Nagin
ME AND THE COMMON MAN
by John Kerry
MY WITTY SPEECHES
by Al Gore
HONESTY IN GOVERNMENT
by William Jefferson and Duke Cunningham
RESPECT FOR ETHNIC DIVERSITY
by Geoge Allen
Ian Skinner wrote:
> so... if I start up a flag burning discussion in the bar at the Venetian
> after sessions... will violence break out? :)
>
> So far no violence has been threatened for discussion flag burning. No if
> you where to bring an Old Glory with you and light it up at the bar. Sev
Welcome Oguz.
One quick question:
George Walker Bush. Great President, or Greatest President?
On 10/20/06, Robert Munn wrote:
> Hehe, well said.
>
> Oguz, you just got your crash-course introduction to CF-Community. Welcome!
>
~~~
The whole argument results from the poorly-worded 22nd Amendment. It really
should say that no person shall be allowed to serve more than two terms as
President. I agree with the interpretation of intent in the law that the
combination of the 12th and 22nd Amendments bars Clinton (or W for that
mat
Hehe, well said.
Oguz, you just got your crash-course introduction to CF-Community. Welcome!
On 10/20/06, loathe wrote:
>
> Have a nice glass of hatorade.
>
> Man, you've known me online for how long now?
>
> I EVER pull a punch?
--
---
Robert Munn
www.funkymojo.com
~
> There are some Dell Latitude D600 that I'm looking into bidding on at eBay.
> Feedback???
I use a DELL Latitude D610 for work (WinXP Pro Sp2, 1.8 GHz
processor), it was leased about a year and a half ago and i haven't
had any problems with it except on one occasion the thing bluescreened
on me
There are some Dell Latitude D600 that I'm looking into bidding on at eBay.
Feedback???
> Okay - I have a question for those of you who already have a tablet.
> Can you use the pen to fill out web forms? For example, I'm building a
> CF web app that I'll use out in the field & what I'm hoping
> Is this possible as far as using the pen for this?
Sure! I find the pen support in IE is a little better than Firefox, but either
works fine. The pen basically works the same way a mouse does, you just are
tapping the screen, rather than clicking a mouse. For text fields, you just
click (tap)
I would be arrested if I lit a towel on fire at the front steps of the
Louisiana State Capital as part of a protest. However, I would not if it were
a flag.
Well you should be. If burning anything is an infraction of the law, then
burning the flag is the same infraction with the same penaltie
They know more in a legal sense. However, the First Amendment is 43 words
long. It was written in the simplest terms to make sure it was understood by
all. So they knew more in the decision of Dred Scott v. Sanford? Even I would
have known it was wrong 150 years ago.
> the surpreme court kn
Okay - I have a question for those of you who already have a tablet. Can you
use the pen to fill out web forms? For example, I'm building a CF web app that
I'll use out in the field & what I'm hoping is possible to do is have
dropdowns, checkboxes, etc. that I can select with the pen then save t
I would be arrested if I lit a towel on fire at the front steps of the
Louisiana State Capital as part of a protest. However, I would not if it were
a flag. The reason I would be arrested for lighting the towel on fire was I
would be burning it in an inappropriate place, was breaking the peace
depends on the flag?
and if they are being worn as a pair of pants
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four
times
The prospective presidential candidacy of Hillary Rodham Clinton has
given rise to plenty of speculation about the notion of Bill Clinton
as the nation's first gentleman. But what about another role? How
about, say, vice president?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/19/AR
so... if I start up a flag burning discussion in the bar at the Venetian
after sessions... will violence break out? :)
So far no violence has been threatened for discussion flag burning. No if you
where to bring an Old Glory with you and light it up at the bar. Several
people have indicated t
so... if I start up a flag burning discussion in the bar at the venetian
after sessions... will violence break out? :)
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion informa
Tell me which of the 6 items protected by the First Amendment is burning a
flag? I contend it is not speech, therefore you have 5 other choices.
You contend it is not speech, but I suspect you are not the authority of the
land that can enforce that contention on the rest of us.
--
Russel Madere wrote:
> Tell me which of the 6 items protected by the First Amendment is burning a
> flag? I contend it is not speech, therefore you have 5 other choices.
the surpreme court knows more than you, thank god.
~|
Int
Russel Madere wrote:
> No, not posturing, opinion. You don't like it, tough.
It's not that I don't like it, it's that it's IRRELEVANT to a discussion
about a flag burning amendment.
If it's illegal to burn something in public, then there's no need for a
flag burning amendment.
The point of a
Tell me which of the 6 items protected by the First Amendment is burning a
flag? I contend it is not speech, therefore you have 5 other choices.
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-
No, not posturing, opinion. You don't like it, tough.
> And don't give me that "starting an open fire in an inappropriate
> place"
> crap. That's just posturing.
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages
No, I didn't. You read that into what I wrote. The difference I asked about
was spitting on a flag vs burning a flag as free speech.
My point was that spitting on an item was protected as free speech. I don't
remember the specifics, but it was a ruling in the late 70s. We had a big
discussi
At first glance I thought this said "Does this make sense to anyone??
Intelligent Democrats".
Heh. I'll just leave that one hanging out there.
On 10/20/06, Erika L. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What are Intelligent Documents?
>
> A document is a portable and organised way of presenting in
The snippet you gave us doesn't mention any details about HOW the
"intelligence" is supposedly induced into these documents in order to make
them affective.
I mean..if they have some new-wave method that magically turns an ordinary
sales pitch into a can't fail money maker...that's one thing. But
Anybody had this procedure done on one of their knees?
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four
times a year.
ht
666 deleted items in my gmail and my outlook "deleted" folders today,
at the same time.
wow.
--
'Never have anything in your life that you can't walk out on in thirty
seconds flat, if you spot the heat coming around the corner'
robert deniro - heat (1995)
~~
That's nice to hear ... Any advice to give to the creators of the
content?
##| -Original Message-
##| From: G Money
##|
##| Looks almost like a joke.
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of h
Bah, you guys are going to need a thicker skin than that.
Also, I'm not known to be the biggest fan of piece, way more money to made
during war :)
> -Original Message-
> From: OÄuz Demirkapı [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 2:48 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject:
> burn = act
> spit = act
> What is the difference?
You're conflating two entirely seperate acts...
Originally you asked what the difference was between spitting on a
person and burning a flag. The answer is a person is a person
(governed by assault/battery statues) a flag is an object (protecte
Have a nice glass of hatorade.
Man, you've known me online for how long now?
I EVER pull a punch?
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Munn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 2:34 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: New in ...
>
> Dude, way to roll out the welcom
Keep believing that son.
> -Original Message-
> From: Rick Root [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 1:36 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: The Fairness Doctrine
>
> Gruss Gott wrote:
> >
> > Let's just be clear: you CAN knock the sh1t out of someone for doing
> >
Sure, cause we all know how much attention I pay to shit like that :)
> -Original Message-
> From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 1:27 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: The Fairness Doctrine
>
> > Rick wrote:
> > You absolutely should not be able
Hooaah
I'm saying, let so haji fuck reawaken the giant.
> -Original Message-
> From: G Money [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 1:26 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Republicans Suspend Habeas Corpus
>
> On 10/20/06, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
>
Robert,
Not a problem at all. :-)
He also used wrong country name etc. but who cares. We like peace
and friendship and that is enough.
Anyway, thanks for your interest.
Sincerely,
OÄuz Demirkapı
TeraTech Inc. | Senior Developer
405 East Gude Dr Suite 207,
Welcome to the US, Oguz.
On 10/20/06, Oðuz Demirkapý <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi again,
>
> > Where are you from originally Oguz, and what brought you to the
> states?
> >
> I borned in Turkey and lived there until `99. Than I was in lots of
> different countries because of m
Dude, way to roll out the welcome mat.
On 10/20/06, loathe wrote:
>
> Turkey huh?
>
> So, how about that Albanian genocide?
--
---
Robert Munn
www.funkymojo.com
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Upda
> How about flinging poop at a monkey that's holding a flag?
Probably not illegal.
though the monkey probably doesn't qualify for full-value
Constitutionally protected free speech--what with the newly enacted
legislation and the monkey not being a citizen and all...
--
will
"If my life weren'
PS3 is going to open up it's doors to online gaming...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/6069082.stm
You won't need to buy games on disk...
Casey
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hittin
Have a drink.
On 10/20/06, Larry Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> gMoney wrote:
> >> ^^^ Larry's drunk at noon again
> >>
> >
> >Naw, he ususally doesn't make typos until he starts sobering up. And
> >when he's sober he sure is mean. Luckily THAT doesn't happen too
> >often.
>
> I ju
You're weird
On 10/20/06, Gruss Gott wrote:
> > Sam wrote:
> > So black and white.
> > Not yet.
> >
>
> Which is exactly how you know we lost.
>
> Your lesson for today comes from Today's WSJ:
> -
> Critical-thinking skills ar
>> gMoney wrote:
>> ^^^ Larry's drunk at noon again
>>
>
>Naw, he ususally doesn't make typos until he starts sobering up. And
>when he's sober he sure is mean. Luckily THAT doesn't happen too
>often.
I just type too fast for myself.
But if you want mean...
How about a bastardized piece o
> WillBo wrote:
> is spitting on a flag illegal?
>
How about flinging poop at a monkey that's holding a flag?
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by yo
> Sam wrote:
> So black and white.
> Not yet.
>
Which is exactly how you know we lost.
Your lesson for today comes from Today's WSJ:
-
Critical-thinking skills are necessary for engaging in critical
thinking, but they are not
> What is the difference?
is spitting on a flag illegal?
--
will
"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable."
- Carrie Fisher
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80
> gMoney wrote:
> simply don't like flag burning hippies and want
> them arrested.
>
Doctor: "What would like to watch as you slip away from this world?"
Grandpa Simpson: "Hippies being beaten with clubs."
~|
Introducing the Fus
burn = act
spit = act
What is the difference?
>> I'm personally unsure of the difference, but I'm not a legal scholar.
>
>person = person
>flag = object
>
>now?
>--
>will
>
>"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
>and that would just be unacceptable."
>- Carrie Fisher
~~~
> Ian wrote:
> And don't give me that "starting an open fire in an inappropriate place"
> crap. That's just posturing.
>
So how about this: You're lost in death valley and it's night and
you're freezing. And old flag blows by and is your only source of
kindling. Can you burn the flag to save y
and you'll find an awful lot of people who will support you in your ass kicking
This saddens and concerns me greatly.
It just screams "might makes right", "mob rules", "intimidation" to me. And in
my mind that is 180 degrees opposite of what has made our country great. I
will support anybody
Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> Let's just be clear: you CAN knock the sh1t out of someone for doing
> it. There just may some legal details you have to deal with
> afterward.
I believe the vast majority of people who SAY they would do such a thing
would actually prefer NOT go get arrested, go to jail, a
On 10/20/06, Ian Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I suspect the problem with this for those who want an amendment or to
> commit battery on such persons is that the punishment for illegal burning is
> only going to be a few dollars and maybe a touch of community service, which
> is not severe
> gMoney wrote:
> Interesting analogybecause a Marine with his hands bound, legs bound,
> one eye covered, in a dust storm...is still one lethal muthaphukka'.
Damn right. We just have a LOT fewer options than we used to. But
poking sticks will provoke a reaction.
> would be wise not to unde
So black and white.
Not yet.
On 10/20/06, Gruss Gott wrote:
> > Sam wrote:
> > We didn't lose no matter how many times you say it.
>
> Did we win?
>
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
I guess I mis-read something or misunderstood. The PS3 will be backwards
compatible. My bad.
Duane
-Original Message-
From: Duane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 2:36 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Sony Playstation 3 Gets FireFox & Linux
>From what I've read,
BTW, the reason they want to pass a flag burning AMENDMENT to our
constitution is because EVERY law passed outlawing desecration of the
flag HAS BEEN OVERTURNED by the courts.
Any law protecting the flag in such a way is onconstitutional because
every one of them violated the first (and most im
Exactly...and you'll find an awful lot of people who will support you in
your ass kicking, but the State can't, and shouldn't, be among them.
On 10/20/06, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Rick wrote:
> > You absolutely should not be able to beat someone up for legally
> > expressing the
And don't give me that "starting an open fire in an inappropriate place"
crap. That's just posturing.
My take on this, is if it is illegal to burn ANYTHING where the person(s) are
burning the flag. Charge them with such infraction.
I suspect the problem with this for those who want an amend
> gMoney wrote:
> ^^^ Larry's drunk at noon again
>
Naw, he ususally doesn't make typos until he starts sobering up. And
when he's sober he sure is mean. Luckily THAT doesn't happen too
often.
~|
Introducing the Fusion Aut
>From what I've read, the Sony PS3 will only run on blue laser DVDs. I cant
remember where I read it, but the article stated that a lot of the
manufacturers are unhappy about this because of increased production costs.
Apparently these disks are a much higher quality but much more expensive.
This h
> Rick wrote:
> You absolutely should not be able to beat someone up for legally
> expressing themselves.
>
Let's just be clear: you CAN knock the sh1t out of someone for doing
it. There just may some legal details you have to deal with
afterward.
> Did we win?
We turned a corner.
--
will
"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable."
- Carrie Fisher
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
On 10/20/06, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So prior to Bush foreign policy we were like a strong Marine. Now
> we're the same Marine except hands bound behind the back, legs bound,
> one eye covered, in a dust storm.
Interesting analogybecause a Marine with his hands bound, legs
Russel Madere wrote:
> Because as the emblem of our country it deserves protection from desecration.
> I only support the defintion of purposeful burning of the flag outside of of
> disposal ceremonies as desecration. That is an act, not speech. It is
> associated with NON peacful demonstrati
> Sam wrote:
> We didn't lose no matter how many times you say it.
Did we win?
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your doo
On 10/20/06, Oðuz Demirkapý <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Welcome to the US...and to CF-Community.
> >
> I think I am not new here. :) I am familiar with this list and most
> of the CF community from other lists. I also know lots of people
> personally because of being active
On 10/20/06, Larry Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> enjoy the show.
>
> laryr
>
^^^ Larry's drunk at noon again
--
"If I had a million dollars, I'd buy you an exotic pet...like a llama, or an
emu."
~|
Introducing the
loathe wrote:
> I think there are some things that should be held sacred, the flag is one of
> those things for me, however I think it should still be able to be burned.
>
> However I should be able to beat the crap out of anyone that does so.
You absolutely should not be able to beat someone up
G Money wrote:
> But why, Russ? The flag is one hell of an important symbol to me too man,
> but what it represents has to be MORE important, doesn't it?
>
> On 10/20/06, Russel Madere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>The only restriction I support is a ban on the purposeful burning of a
>>flag not
So much for killing this thread.
I can't believe you're a neo-con now.
Are you suggesting we attack NK rather then negotiate?
We didn't lose no matter how many times you say it. When people like
you and Jane Fonda convince enough people that we need to surrender
and stop fighting for survival then
> I'm personally unsure of the difference, but I'm not a legal scholar.
person = person
flag = object
now?
--
will
"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable."
- Carrie Fisher
~|
Intr
> tBone wrote:
> Turkey huh?
> So, how about that Albanian genocide?
>
Welcome to the list Oguz!
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, del
Turkey huh?
So, how about that Albanian genocide?
> -Original Message-
> From: OÄuz Demirkapı [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 12:36 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: New in ...
>
> Hi again,
>
> > Where are you from originally Oguz, and what broug
>Every one i've seen like this is far more expensive and windows runs a lot
>slower.
>
>
>
PC Mag did a point by point comparison of a top of the line Macbook Pro and a
top of the Dell. The MacBook Pro with a similar set of options came in about
$400 cheaper. In
Many others don't. I look at other acts of desecration as speech and therefore
protected. The burning I do not.
An example of this is spitting on the flag. I remember a case where spitting
on an item was protected as speech. I do not remeber the specifics, I was
still in elementary school.
> Russ wrote:
> Because as the emblem of our country it deserves protection from desecration.
If you protect the flag then you elevate it above the people. That is,
you're saying that a symbol is more important than the people for
which it stands.
Once you do that, you're a slave to symbol. And
Welcome Oguz,
Watch out for the welcoming bombardment of virtual muffins, name your flavour.
enjoy the show.
laryr
>Thanks Tony,
>
>I prefer to have my name as is, but you can use "Oguz Demirkapi" as
>in my e-mail address. :)
>
>
>Sincerely,
>
>O?uz Demirkap?
>
>TeraTech Inc
Hi again,
> Where are you from originally Oguz, and what brought you to the states?
>
I borned in Turkey and lived there until `99. Than I was in lots of
different countries because of my and my wifes job but mainly
Germany and Turkey. We came to Germany because of my wifes pos
Why? Both acts break the peace and therefore should be illegal.
The First Amendment specifically protects 6 things. None of these include
breaking the peace.
>I think there are some things that should be held sacred, the flag is one of
>those things for me, however I think it should still be ab
Good argument, never looked at it that way.
> -Original Message-
> From: Russel Madere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 12:18 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: The Fairness Doctrine
>
> Because as the emblem of our country it deserves protection from
> desecra
Because as the emblem of our country it deserves protection from desecration.
I only support the defintion of purposeful burning of the flag outside of of
disposal ceremonies as desecration. That is an act, not speech. It is
associated with NON peacful demonstrations as the act of starting an
I think there are some things that should be held sacred, the flag is one of
those things for me, however I think it should still be able to be burned.
However I should be able to beat the crap out of anyone that does so.
Action, reaction.
> -Original Message-
> From: Gruss Gott [mailto:
> gMoney wrote:
> But why, Russ? The flag is one hell of an important symbol to me too man,
> but what it represents has to be MORE important, doesn't it?
>
And to me the whole concept of America is that we DON'T worship a
flag. We stand for freedom and liberty and burning a flag is one of
those
Cool. I chose the Elks over the Masons. They had a pool.
>VFW and Masons.
>
>I'm not really catholic anymore, so I'm not K of C but I have lots of
>friends that are.
>
>>
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update.
> gMoney wrote:
> The bargaining chips were are sons, daughters, mothers, fathers, sisters and
> brothers.
>
> Those are pretty goddam high stakes.
>
Our relatives and most of our diplomatic capital. All spent. And out
debt to China totally hobbles us in dealing with North Korea.
So Bush's "we
VFW and Masons.
I'm not really catholic anymore, so I'm not K of C but I have lots of
friends that are.
> -Original Message-
> From: Russel Madere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 11:56 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: The Fairness Doctrine
>
> Which ones?
I want to install Ubuntu on my 2nd hard drive at home to play with (for now). I
know there's a way to have the system ask which OS to boot, but this is my
first go at this so I'm looking for a little help.
Any help appreciated,
Donna
~
But why, Russ? The flag is one hell of an important symbol to me too man,
but what it represents has to be MORE important, doesn't it?
On 10/20/06, Russel Madere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The only restriction I support is a ban on the purposeful burning of a
> flag not associated with proper
Looks almost like a joke.
On 10/20/06, Erika L. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What are Intelligent Documents?
>
> A document is a portable and organised way of presenting information.
> Intelligent Documents are documents that do this whilst achieving the
> purpose for which they were crea
Which ones? K of C, Legion or Elks? Leading Knight of Lodge 490 here.
>Hehe, I'm in more than one of those groups.
>
>I'm wondering if that was meant to be insulting or not.
>
>>
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Up
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
