Do youcould you just get this down tosay...one or two paragraphs?
:)
You're saying that a key advantage of Open Source is that the user
himself can alter the code and extend functionality as he needs to.
You also mentioned the many modifications and extensions of the Apache
webserver as ev
that's not uncommon in the political topics. If you go ahead and look at the
talk page, you'll see that a lot of the dispute has nothing to do with the
Bush section though.
But ok. ::shrug::
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2006/03/24/bush_shuns_patriot_act_requirement/
Bush shuns Patr
Are you citing the article that has a big disclaimer at the top that says,
"The neutrality of this article is in dispute" ? Come on!
Yes, Bush has exercised executive power without the agreement of Congress,
much as past Presidents have done. But it is a gigantic leap from exercising
executive pow
Welcome to reality! And I thought you couldn't learn :)
On 2/7/07, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> yes but we all know that the UN is really a plot to undermine the American
> way of life, right?
~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion
yes but we all know that the UN is really a plot to undermine the American
way of life, right?
On 2/7/07, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I thought it was world-wide.
>
>
> On 2/7/07, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > because it's a national not a municipal issue?
> >
>
>
~~
I thought it was world-wide.
On 2/7/07, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> because it's a national not a municipal issue?
>
~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7
Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform
That's old news. Kibby looked as his notes and said he was wrong,
Cheney told him a month earlier but he forgot. Everyone so far has
testified incorrectly but only Libby should go to jail?
On 2/7/07, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sam wrote:
> > How does that hurt Kibby?
> >
>
> Kibby's
> -Original Message-
> From: Rick Root [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 7:40 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Not all tradition is a good idea
>
> A bill is coming up in the north carolina general assembly that would
> allow
> people in north carolina courts t
because it's a national not a municipal issue?
On 2/7/07, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So it's working. Why do we need federal laws?
>
> On 2/7/07, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > not to mention 213 cities in 38 states
> >
> > http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/opinion/263794_city22.html
> >
actually income after taxes is disposable income I think. Income after
necessities is discretionary income, money you can make choices about.
Should I buy a new dress or a new sound card? Like that. Yep, there is room
for a definition of necessary, but one seems to floating around the business
worl
So it's working. Why do we need federal laws?
On 2/7/07, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> not to mention 213 cities in 38 states
>
> http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/opinion/263794_city22.html
>
> On 2/7/07, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Sam wrote:
> > > So you found three people t
I am not trying to say a thing right now actually... just that this concept
exists and is taught in economics classes. I realize that you don't belive
in economics post Adam SMith ::sigh:: but I thought I'd mention this. Oh,
that and, your reaction to this sort of topic always make me wonder what
> GMan wrote:
> Hmmm ... I'll leave!
>
Remember - as Americans we compete not only to keep the best and
brightest, but to attract the best and brightest. We should endevour
to have America be the best place in the world to make and keep a
fortune.
If it's not, then people will go elsewhere inclu
> Larry wrote:
> he'll probably leave just in time for Cheney rejoin Halliburton and hire
> Scooter as a senior assistant.
>
True enough, Scooter will probably be just fine. Unless ...
People start wondering why the President told us we needed to invade
Iraq due to an impending nuclear holocau
> Casey wrote:
> No, Sociaty is getting too expensive for those without discretionary income.
> When this happens the government needs to pickup the pace and offer
> additional services which compensate for this. Those who make more money
> need to pick up the slack or leave!
>
Ah, so I can stay i
> You're trying really hard to say that others should pay for things you
> want because all your money is tied up in other things you want.
No, Sociaty is getting too expensive for those without discretionary income.
When this happens the government needs to pickup the pace and offer
additional s
> Dana wrote:
> welp, there is a standard. Sorry.
>
A relative standard. Income after taxes? you could be a billionaire
and not have discretionary income based on those standards.
You're trying really hard to say that others should pay for things you
want because all your money is tied up in ot
welp, there is a standard. Sorry.
http://retailindustry.about.com/b/a/140333.htm
On 2/7/07, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Dana wrote:
> > you don't understand my point, which is that we don't have to
> second-guess
> > his choice of car. It doesn't matter -- even once he pays for it
some of them have the option. Just some. Sorry if the notion disturbs you.
On 2/7/07, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Dana wrote:
> > oh sure there are people like that. America is a great place. But no ;)
> most
> > people who are poor are not poor by choice. What a Victorian concept.
>> Sam wrote:
>> How does that hurt Kibby?
>>
>
>Kibby's whole defense is that Russert told him about Plame. Russert
>says he didn't know about it until Novak's column.
>
>Unless the defense pulls a rabbit out of the hat, Scooter's going to
>prison. And he's been very careful not to incriminate C
On 2/7/07, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 2/7/07, Denstizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This one's funny:
> > http://thinkprogress.org/2006/10/22/bush-stay-the-course/
>
> I'll give you a little fib on that but really, you really think that's an
> issue?
Naw. Come on. The dude said "s
> Dana wrote:
> oh sure there are people like that. America is a great place. But no ;) most
> people who are poor are not poor by choice. What a Victorian concept.
>
Everyone has challenges.
Some have it easier: they live in nice neighborhoods, have married
parents with professional friends, etc
> Dana wrote:
> you don't understand my point, which is that we don't have to second-guess
> his choice of car. It doesn't matter -- even once he pays for it, he still
> has discretionary income. Lots and lots of it.
>
Everyone does. And the danger of saying there's "discretionary"
income is that
oh sure there are people like that. America is a great place. But no ;) most
people who are poor are not poor by choice. What a Victorian concept.
Dana
On 2/7/07, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Dana wrote:
> > That's just funny. Or maybe sad, I am not sure. I've known quite a few
> >
you don't understand my point, which is that we don't have to second-guess
his choice of car. It doesn't matter -- even once he pays for it, he still
has discretionary income. Lots and lots of it.
On 2/7/07, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Dana wrote:
> > Even if that guy making over $
> Dana wrote:
> That's just funny. Or maybe sad, I am not sure. I've known quite a few
> people who worked their asses off and stayed quite poor.
>
Their choice. My brother dropped out of HS at 16 and now, if he sold
his biz, he'd be a millionaire.
~~~
> Dana wrote:
> Even if that guy making over $200,000 has a pretty snazzy car and an
> expensive house, he still has quite a bit left over for whatever don't you
> think?
NO! Who's to say what's "snazzy" or expensive? I'm sure you've got
lots of luxuries that, during an audit, I could declare yo
> Sam wrote:
> How does that hurt Kibby?
>
Kibby's whole defense is that Russert told him about Plame. Russert
says he didn't know about it until Novak's column.
Unless the defense pulls a rabbit out of the hat, Scooter's going to
prison. And he's been very careful not to incriminate Cheney, so
On 2/7/07, Jim Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Denstizzo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 12:43 PM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: Re: Why Linux is more secure than Windows
> >
> > There are people you pay to administer i
LOL
Yes it is a damn addictive game, many sleepless nights to be had with that
game.
Andrew Scott
Senior Coldfusion Developer
Aegeon Pty. Ltd.
www.aegeon.com.au
Phone: +613 8676 4223
Mobile: 0404 998 273
-Original Message-
From: Ben Doom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday
The money needs to come from somewhere. We don't tax companies, we don't
want to tax on the rich. Go ahead tax the little guy more, bam, IraqUSA in
no time. The less money the little guy has, the less secure our society is.
How about giving up that work happy hour? Don't take that trip?
> Instead
he said he found one
>
> > where's tim-rock, he has been kinda quiet lately... must be job huntin'
>
>
>
-
~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7
Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs
http:htt
not to mention 213 cities in 38 states
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/opinion/263794_city22.html
On 2/7/07, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Sam wrote:
> > So you found three people that will probably gain the most from new
> > laws and that means what?
> >
>
> They're 10 people who are
Yep. See the section on hte Bush administration
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unitary_executive_theory
On 2/7/07, Denstizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Gruss IS right. And it's already going down in the history books as such.
>
> This isn't conjecture, Robdog!
>
> On 2/7/07, Robert Munn <[EMAI
> Essentially, only whores get cervical cancer. That's what the religious
> right wants you to believe. I've actually heard that argument before too.
Well, everyone knows that only whores have cervicals. Right?
--Ben
~|
Upgra
How does that hurt Kibby?
On 2/7/07, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In court this afternoon, Russert gave a vivid description of his
> telephone call from Libby, saying that it rapidly "evolved into a
> consumer complaint." Russert testified that Libby was upset that Chris
> Matthews, the
so the woman who gets HPV from her husband should just die I guess. Don't
mind me, I know you are reporting the position not advocating it, but it
really does frost me off.
Dana
On 2/7/07, Rick Root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 2/7/07, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > religious people
Hey Einstein, I'm looking for the term "no plans to invade Iraq"
Can you help me out with that?
On 2/7/07, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> here, since you seem to have trouble operating a search engine -- here is
> one link, with the pertinent bit in the first paragraph. If you need help
> with
That's just funny. Or maybe sad, I am not sure. I've known quite a few
people who worked their asses off and stayed quite poor.
Total bullshit. Just about everyone in this country can make what
> they want - just a matter of motivation and choice.
~~~
On 2/7/07, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> religious people trip me out. I was listening to talk radio this morning
> on
> the way in, and the gist of it seemed to be that the HPV vaccination is a
> big conspiracy to... something. How can anyone possibly think that
> preventing cancer is a bad
On 2/7/07, Denstizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This one's funny:
> http://thinkprogress.org/2006/10/22/bush-stay-the-course/
I'll give you a little fib on that but really, you really think that's an issue?
If you think about it the left has changed the meaning of stay the
course. It was intende
On 2/7/07, Ben Doom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So what you're saying is that we should all swear on the WACK?
DING DING DING! We HAVE A WINNER!
~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7
Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & crea
So what you're saying is that we should all swear on the WACK?
--Ben
Rick Root wrote:
> A bill is coming up in the north carolina general assembly that would allow
> people in north carolina courts to swear oaths by "the bible or any other
> text sacred to that person's religious faith"
>
> Anyw
religious people trip me out. I was listening to talk radio this morning on
the way in, and the gist of it seemed to be that the HPV vaccination is a
big conspiracy to... something. How can anyone possibly think that
preventing cancer is a bad thing???
On 2/7/07, Rick Root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
Rick Root wrote:
> Does WoW mean "World of Warcraft"?
Yes.
> Now she gets out the laptop and as soon as my daughter goes to bed, she's
> online playing warcraft until 10:30.
Of course.
> I never should've bought it for her!
Duh. :-)
> I haven't been addicted to any game like that since playi
well yes, this is my point, and I *think* Jerry's too. There is this thing
called discretionary income, which is how much you have left when you have
paid your taxes, your rent, your bills and your food. The amount of this is
what determines your standard of living. That guy making $10 an hour does
> Casey wrote:
> Those making over 200,000 should have enough to kick in a little extra. I
> mean come on, that's $16,666 gross per month * 25% subtract the $4166 and
> this person still has $12,500 per month. Many of whom work just as hard as
> those making $10 a hour struggling.
>
Total bullshi
In court this afternoon, Russert gave a vivid description of his
telephone call from Libby, saying that it rapidly "evolved into a
consumer complaint." Russert testified that Libby was upset that Chris
Matthews, the host of the MSNBC show "Hardball," had said in two
broadcasts that Cheney was respo
here, since you seem to have trouble operating a search engine -- here is
one link, with the pertinent bit in the first paragraph. If you need help
with that double click thing, let me know :)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A17347-2004Apr16.html
On 2/7/07, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Does WoW mean "World of Warcraft"?
My wife is freakin' addicted to that damn game. She used to sit in bed and
read in the evenings and go to sleep at 9:30.
Now she gets out the laptop and as soon as my daughter goes to bed, she's
online playing warcraft until 10:30.
I never should've bought it
A bill is coming up in the north carolina general assembly that would allow
people in north carolina courts to swear oaths by "the bible or any other
text sacred to that person's religious faith"
Anyway, the local conservative talk radio show host here in the afternoons
(WPTF Raleigh) seemed to th
really. Cause I get "about 172,000 results"...
http://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&channel=s&hl=en&q=%22plan+of+attack%22+%22bob+woodward%22&btnG=Google+Search
maybe your skills do need work
On 2/7/07, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I did.
> Got
I've been reading through this post and while I agree with much that's being
said, I just want to state for those of us who don't make 200,000 a year, it
totally makes sense for those people to pay more taxes. If the average
salary in the usa is $10 per hour how do you expect to extract enough cash
> Sam wrote:
> I'm afraid GE is in it for the money.
Of course they're in it for the money! Catch up.
~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7
Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs
http:http://ad.
I'm afraid GE is in it for the money. Aren't they the ones trying to
sell the new green technology? If they really cared, they'd clean the
Hudson
On 2/7/07, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> They're 10 people who are CEOs of major companies. That means the
> business opposition to whether
> Denny wrote:
> The attitude is what bugs me. This isn't a closed system, like
> J-man pointed out.
Let's look at Iraq.
--
Who's dying over there? Not me nor anyone in my family. Nor am I
asked to sacrifice anything. Yet Iraq has been tied to my very
security. Shouldn
> Sam wrote:
> So you found three people that will probably gain the most from new
> laws and that means what?
>
They're 10 people who are CEOs of major companies. That means the
business opposition to whether GW exists or not is gone. Now the
debate has move to what to do about it.
That's a go
Enabler! =]
I do still have the demo installed on my kick ass 64 system... hrm...
No! Must stay strong!
It is freakishly fun tho...
Resist, Resist...
Play a lute, have a jam sesh...
On 2/7/07, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You want to play WoW with me :)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Denstizzo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 12:43 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Why Linux is more secure than Windows
>
> There are people you pay to administer it. Same as anything else.
> We've been over this before, howev
No Exploit has ever gained access as the service account, the two you listed
both gained access via the IIS anonymous user account, and account with
limited rights on the server.
The process that listens on the network Is svchost, which does run as the
local system, however it can be changed, it d
On 2/7/07, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 2/6/07, Denstizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you watch Fox News you saw it. The Right was quick to bash those
> > who opposed, and you know it. And nobody said anything (how I felt).
>
> Why is it you can never back up anything you say? Come
i wasnt insinuating, you all just got to see
tony's brain work...
one thought, railed smack dab into another :)
but glad to see you are doin good.
tw
On 2/7/07, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nah, actually am back working :)
>
> DoS doesn't liek us having these kinds of list on secure gov'
You want to play WoW with me :)
On 2/7/07, Denstizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ah, yes DDT. Another sterling example of capitalism solving
> problems. Can't sell it here? Sell it there! Not like we don't
> import from there, anyways. Pt.
> No circle of dependence, nope. None.
>
> Mayb
On 2/7/07, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The DDT controversy. Damned if you spray, damned if you don't
Ah, yes DDT. Another sterling example of capitalism solving
problems. Can't sell it here? Sell it there! Not like we don't
import from there, anyways. Pt.
No circle of dependence, n
On 2/7/07, Bruce Sorge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This is pretty darn funny.
>
> http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,250711,00.html
Personal Fav:
"Can we marry up those two or maybe that's the wrong word
can we have some kind of union of those two issues?" Ackerman asked.
Priceless!
~
LOL.
On 2/7/07, Denstizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 2/7/07, Bruce Sorge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Although the article never mentions suicide (just that folks who are
> > distracted by little listening devices are apt to get run over), it was
> a
> > very informative and interesti
On 2/7/07, Bruce Sorge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Although the article never mentions suicide (just that folks who are
> distracted by little listening devices are apt to get run over), it was a
> very informative and interesting history lesson.
Yes, I was laughing about trying to nerf-ize li
Gruss IS right. And it's already going down in the history books as such.
This isn't conjecture, Robdog!
On 2/7/07, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> right
>
> On 2/7/07, Gruss wrote:
> >
> > > RoMunn wrote:
> > > i'm sorry which one of those did he do?
> > >
> >
> > Well, you
Not I.
but I found the family history entertaining.
I'd seriously posit that there are waay better social NWS then myspace.
=]
On 2/7/07, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> No, Denshtizzler
>
~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion
I did.
Got nothin, nada zip!
On 2/7/07, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's a very fine reference with several chapters on the many ways that
> that statement was untrue. If you can't google it, that's on you. I don't
> have time to play right now.
>
By drug do you happen to mean Larium?
It isn't banned as far as I know, but I swear to god I'll never take it
again, I'd sooner GEt malaria.
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 3:44 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Another Rant
Blame
Tim is happily employed again, working for the Dept of State.
Thanks for the thoughts :)
-Original Message-
From: Crow T Robot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 3:14 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Need Cold Fusion help
I was wondering about Tim too
> --
Seriously, with WoW who needs to troll mailing lists, I can troll some
online noob sauce, then kill him, in WoW :)
-Original Message-
From: Zaphod Beeblebrox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 3:18 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Need Cold Fusion help
nah, he's
Nah, actually am back working :)
DoS doesn't liek us having these kinds of list on secure gov't systems is
all :)
BTW, I wouldn't troll like this, I'd do a much better job.
-Original Message-
From: Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 3:05 PM
To: CF-Community
They wouldn't take my ccard. Thank god.
See, I'm kinda obsessive. Or perhaps compulsive.
Compulsively Obsessive. Yup. Screwed on tight. :)
I sorta follow along tho... got some peeps who'r into it. Waaay into it.
That "Plague" was pretty awesome, neh?
On 2/1/07, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
That's a very fine reference with several chapters on the many ways that
that statement was untrue. If you can't google it, that's on you. I don't
have time to play right now.
On 2/7/07, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Just like I though, you can't even come up with one. Reality sucks huh :P
>
** Private ** wrote:
> What account does Apache start under?
The account you configure it to start under.
>> The most
>> obvious privilege is the privilege to start processes under a
>> different user account.
>
> The IIS worker process starts under it's own identity - Network
> Service.
Heh. Oh yeah. I drive a Subaru. 96. Feaking awesome cars.
I've got a jeepster that I'll someday repair and go 4x4ing with tho.
Someday. Yeah.. It's an old V6. Pimp.
For the peeps with the data on Al-- You're not getting this from
drudge, are you?
And for the !"do as I say but not as I do"
The DDT controversy. Damned if you spray, damned if you don't
On 2/7/07, Denstizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My point is that (hey- are you saying the drug is the only
> way to get rid of malaria? Give me a break- Uncle!) there
> are many things that, if it were really about the stuff we say
>
Just like I though, you can't even come up with one. Reality sucks huh :P
On 2/7/07, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The reference for this and for the fact that he in fact did is Plan of
> Attack by Bob Woodward. I'm at work and can't chase a link this second.
~
Although the article never mentions suicide (just that folks who are
distracted by little listening devices are apt to get run over), it was a
very informative and interesting history lesson.
Bruce
On 2/7/07, Denstizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 2/7/07, Bruce Sorge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
On 2/7/07, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Blame the environmentalists for banning the drug that curbs it.
I've said it before- I'll say it again. 'twas the beer commercials.
Oh, never said that here but, you know. I've said it. =]
Blame only gets you so far. It's cool to bitch and "blam
> Sam wrote:
> Tell him GG, what's the mileage on you're huge 8 cylinder?
>
Well, if I drive the freeway a lot then about 20 (my high is 27). If
I'm fecking around in the 'burbs are normal, then about 12-15.
http://pictureposter.audiworld.com/71240/4.2web.jpg
~~~
On 2/7/07, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It's just a phenomenon that surrounds the human animal.
> ...
> Part of it is a completely valid desire to help continue our species as
> long
> as possible. What's fascinating is that once we've exhausted our interest
> in
> the current "hot" topic
The reference for this and for the fact that he in fact did is Plan of
Attack by Bob Woodward. I'm at work and can't chase a link this second.
On 2/7/07, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Can you be a little more specific? Maybe even provide a link?
>
> On 2/7/07, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
No, Denshtizzler
On 2/7/07, William Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hrmm... MT-Angry?
>
~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7
Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs
http:http://ad.doubleclick.
Can you be a little more specific? Maybe even provide a link?
On 2/7/07, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> we have no plans to invade Iraq at this time.
~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7
Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & cr
On 2/7/07, Bruce Sorge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> We have all heard that the basic tenet of Darwin's "Theory of Evolution"
> lies with Natural Selection. Well, I guess this could be a modern form of
> it? LOL.
But that distracted person could be the next Einstein!!!
We gotta protect people f
we have no plans to invade Iraq at this time.
On 2/7/07, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 2/6/07, Denstizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you watch Fox News you saw it. The Right was quick to bash those
> > who opposed, and you know it. And nobody said anything (how I felt).
>
> Why is
I think it is... :D
-Original Message-
From: Erika L. Walker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 8:16 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: WoW Thread
Isn't porn a better alternative?
~|
Upgrade to
Yea, he does. I just figured he packed up and moved on, but maybe this is
pt deux.
> -Original Message-
> From: Erika L. Walker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 3:58 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Need Cold Fusion help
>
> He writes almost EXACTLY like
right
On 2/7/07, Gruss wrote:
>
> > RoMunn wrote:
> > i'm sorry which one of those did he do?
> >
>
> Well, you said, "it's not as if he asked Congress" and I was pointing
> out that Mr. Bush hasn't asked or worked with Congress on a damn
> thing.
>
> The whole point of his Presidency has
He writes almost EXACTLY like the guy from executive, mr D.F.
On 2/7/07, Tony wrote:
>
> i wonder who...
>
> they dont write like anyone writes on here...
>
~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7
Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration
It's just a phenomenon that surrounds the human animal.
We can become infactuated with a scenario that seems to reasonably represent
a threat to our existence.diminishing rain forests, global cooling,
global warming, oceanic pollution, sun spots, asteroids, acid rainon and
on. Everything o
hrmm... MT-Angry?
On 2/7/07, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That crosses you off, GG is also off.
> Who else
> How about the angry guy?
>
>
> On 2/7/07, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > i wonder who...
> >
> > they dont write like anyone writes on here...
> >
> > i cant figure it out, ive
That crosses you off, GG is also off.
Who else
How about the angry guy?
On 2/7/07, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i wonder who...
>
> they dont write like anyone writes on here...
>
> i cant figure it out, ive been trying.
>
> where's tim-rock, he has been kinda quiet lately... must be job
Blame the environmentalists for banning the drug that curbs it.
On 2/7/07, Denstizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Did you know that: ( http://www.amref.org/ )
> *Malaria is the most important parasitic disease in the world*. It kills
> 3,000 children every day and more than one million each yea
On 2/6/07, Denstizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you watch Fox News you saw it. The Right was quick to bash those
> who opposed, and you know it. And nobody said anything (how I felt).
Why is it you can never back up anything you say? Come on, one link
can't be that hard.
> And a sexual cas
I was wondering what to use when trolling for trolls. Evidently they like
frogs. I suggest a 2-0 hook and 30 lbs test or SpiderWire.
>>Well you've won. Now I'm sitting here crying my eyes out, just like I did in
>>summer camp when the counsellors made fun of me
for my macaroni art where I t
On 2/7/07, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Come on people...the diminishing rain forests was the crisis of the mid to
> late 1990's. This is the 21st century, where the crisis that is going to
> kill us all is global warming.
>
> Try to keep current on your doomsday scenarios.
Valid point.
1 - 100 of 206 matches
Mail list logo
