imho there was a good deal of arrogance and ignorance involved in even
attempting it. It is useful however to remember that this is in many ways a
zero sum game. Didn't they cut financial aid for students last year? Just for
example.
Great answer though.
Hell, if we can't even bury a road
why don't you research that and let me know.
Not another radical left wing-nut poll.
Who sponsors these polls again? Oh yeah, nevermind :P
On 5/11/07, Dana Tierney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thursday, according to the posted snippet. Or are you saying we
should wait for a signed
Be nice Gruss. You know he doesn't know what the mission is. Don't annoy the
poor man.
/mommy voice
Just now?
hehehe
On 5/11/07, Robert Munn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
~|
ColdFusion MX7 by AdobeĀ®
Dyncamically transform
Not stated. The prime minister said one to two years. The assembly -- we don't
know. Didn't they already pass one of these resolutions, anyway?
Thursday they asked us to leave in two years, not today.
-Original Message-
From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 11,
The chances of that happening actually increased with the war in Iraq.
So you spent 456 billion making that scenario that much more possible.
brilliant.
Fact is the world was safer with Saddam contained in Iraq.
On 5/11/07, Robert Munn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Happy to oblige. $450 billion could
But how much of this money still went back into the US Economy in some
way.
And how much of that money wasn't even used in the war and included pork
barrel spending.
I mean look at the last Iraq funding bill. It included a minimum wage
hike and a couple other things.
-Original Message-
How does one quantify that?
-Original Message-
From: Vivec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2007 7:07 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: What could $456 billion buy.
The chances of that happening actually increased with the war in Iraq.
So you spent 456 billion
Dana wrote:
Be nice Gruss. You know he doesn't know what the mission is. Don't annoy the
poor man.
Alllriiight. Ya know the frustrating thing is, nothing that's
happening in Iraq is a surprise. So here are the questions to Iraq
supporters:
(1.) Shouldn't the commander-in-chief understand
-Original Message-
From: Nick McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2007 8:32 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: What could $456 billion buy.
How does one quantify that?
I don't think we're able to quantify either position: either that we're
safer or that we're
RoMunn wrote:
Happy to oblige. $450 billion could probably buy you an evacuation of
Manhattan if even a small nuclear device were detonated on the island.
Or better, the men and intelligence needed to snap up all of the
enriched uranium on the market, the scientists to create the weapons
and
What could 456,000,000,000 buy?
912,000 chicks at the same time.
On 5/12/07, Gruss Gott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RoMunn wrote:
Happy to oblige. $450 billion could probably buy you an evacuation of
Manhattan if even a small nuclear device were detonated on the island.
Or better, the men
another reason not to vote for him
http://www.cnn.com/video/player/player.html?url=/video/moos/2007/05/04/moos.giuliani.ferret.wabc
~|
Create Web Applications With ColdFusion MX7 Flex 2.
Build powerful, scalable RIAs. Free
Greg wrote:
What could 456,000,000,000 buy?
912,000 chicks at the same time.
Hef has 456B?
~|
Create robust enterprise, web RIAs.
Upgrade integrate Adobe Coldfusion MX7 with Flex 2
I was using the math from Office Space, if the dude can do two chicks
at one time with a million, he should be able to do 912,000 with 456 B
On 5/12/07, Gruss Gott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greg wrote:
What could 456,000,000,000 buy?
912,000 chicks at the same time.
Hef has 456B?
Even before of 9/11 - the odds of an attack on NYC were 100% - since
it had already happened once before. I guess now they are 100
percent-ier?
-Cameron
On 5/12/07, Vivec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The chances of that happening actually increased with the war in Iraq.
So you spent 456 billion
http://babelfish.altavista.com is as good as any. It'll give you the
general gist.
no machine translation is going to be exact
Well that would be nice except that I am translating emails and this could
get pricey if I send them to a human a couple times a week. I am evaluating
some now. Found
Oh really? I was under the impression there had already been two major
terrorist attacks in Manhattan- 1993 and 2001. I must be mistaken.
On 5/12/07, Vivec wrote:
The chances of that happening actually increased with the war in Iraq.
So you spent 456 billion making that scenario that much
-Original Message-
From: Robert Munn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2007 11:36 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: What could $456 billion buy.
Oh really? I was under the impression there had already been two major
terrorist attacks in Manhattan- 1993 and 2001. I
Apparently it's a new rule:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2007/05/10/MNGAMPOFUS1.D
TL
A snippet:
+ + +
Congress needs to quit talking about supporting the troops and put money
where our mouths seem to be, Poe continued. Nathan Bedford Forrest,
successful confederate
19 matches
Mail list logo