On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 9:36 PM, Michael Gr wrote:
>
> Wait. I thought you were for less government?
>
>
I am for more representative government. Take a look at what I said.
Thousands of people work for Congress already, they are just unelected.
~
Wait. I thought you were for less government?
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Jerry Bwrote:
>
> >
> > Representative no longer think of themselves as representatives. They
> > think
> > themselves rulers.
> >
> > Our country desperately ne
I feel like the health care plan is the new bush presidency. Every thread
seems to end up being about it.
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> > gMoney wrote:
> > It's every American's right to lead a shitty lifestyle, and unfortunately
> > many Americans take that option. All
Reading your emails? What exactly *is* it that you think is going to
happen?
> Now you are just being bizarre. Disappeared? Where did you even come up
> with
> that drivel
>
um, you don't seriously think George Soros is behind this do you? And as for
who cares -- I don't, not really, except th
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> you're still getting hysterical over this? Really, you think what they tell
> you to, don't you? Look, they just want to address the substance of the
> chain emails that someone is sending out, the next one of these:
>
> http://www.politifact.com/
> gMoney wrote:
> It's every American's right to lead a shitty lifestyle, and unfortunately
> many Americans take that option. All the taxes and warning labels and
> incentive plans have failed to stem that tide to date...it's reasonable to
> assume that trend will continue.
>
Yeah, but we really
> Maureen wrote:
>
> Republican presidents don't make public requests to spy on citizens.
> They set up monolithic bureaucracies to do it for them under the cover
> of national security.
>
That would've been a super funny zzZING! if it weren't true.
~~
er, forward
most peopel hit reply, and the White House hasn't done squat with the email
addresses so far and I am quite sure won't. It's not the issue. If we find
out otherwise, that is a different story, but it takes a certain kind of
mind to come up with this stuff.
~
you're still getting hysterical over this? Really, you think what they tell
you to, don't you? Look, they just want to address the substance of the
chain emails that someone is sending out, the next one of these:
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/personalities/chain-email/
I am sure we wou
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Larry wrote:
>
> >One of the main privacy arguments for moving to a value added tax is to
> >eliminate the role of the IRS in collecting information on citizens and
> then
> >subjecting them to audits as political intimidation.
>
> Yes no matter that such hits th
>>
>> um, yes. That would be called the IRS, and also the census bureau.
>> Seriously, a nice cup of tea and a lie down should take care of this.
>>
>
>You consent to participate in the Census. See all the chatter among the Left
>about using statistical analysis in the Census because some people a
>There used to be a custom tag someone wrote that I used all the time for 2
>or 3 categories.. pick category one and it would change options in category
>two to pick from. Anyone know what the name of this is or what is available
>to do this code wise so I don't have to reinvent the wheel on an in
Seem to remember it being name cf_twoselectsrelated and
cf_threeselectsrelated by nate somebody.
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Scott Raley wrote:
>
> There used to be a custom tag someone wrote that I used all the time for 2
> or 3 categories.. pick category one and it would change options in c
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> um, yes. That would be called the IRS, and also the census bureau.
> Seriously, a nice cup of tea and a lie down should take care of this.
>
You consent to participate in the Census. See all the chatter among the Left
about using statistical an
Can they? Debatable. The supremes have issued some opinions on this
as it relates to the patriot act, but no clear position exists.
Do they? Absolutely.
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> There is a Constitutional question here. Can the Executive Branch collect
> persona
Republican presidents don't make public requests to spy on citizens.
They set up monolithic bureaucracies to do it for them under the cover
of national security.
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> Let me ask you this - If this same exact request was being made by a
> republic
We all have em honey.Kansas is the home of Pat Buchanan and Sam
Brownback *shudder*
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> It's a source of great shame to me, as a native of Georgia, that
> people at this level of incompetence get sent to congress. I
> apologize to my fellow A
If you send email without specifically requesting that it not be
forwarded, I would assume that forwarding it presents no problem to
you, even if I elect to forward it to the Whitehouse. That would be
especially true for anything posted on a public listserv.
They could nip this issue in the bud
It's a source of great shame to me, as a native of Georgia, that
people at this level of incompetence get sent to congress. I
apologize to my fellow Americans that my home state has inflicted the
likes of this guy, and others such as Bob Barr, Newt Gingrich and
Larry McDonald on the people of thi
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> Apparently, but only when a Democrat does it.
You are missing the point.
Go ahead, made a big deal about this (I mean it, that's swell), but
please, please, please:
When you're on the phone with your congressman/representative, at
least me
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 10:17 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 6:10 PM, denstar wrote:
>>
>> This line of argument strikes me like someone who is all upset about
>> shop-lifting, but murder, eh-- there must be a good reason.
>>
>> This crap is worse? Did I get you confused with s
um, yes. That would be called the IRS, and also the census bureau.
Seriously, a nice cup of tea and a lie down should take care of this.
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Dana wrote:
>
> >
> > you think *I* am whining? send something in a
Apparently, but only when a Democrat does it.
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Dana wrote:
>
>>
>> you think *I* am whining? send something in and see what happens, is what I
>> say. I submit that this will be nothing. I have nothing to say
I wasted fifteen minutes of my life, which I will never get back, on
googling this. Naturally this is coming from Cornyn. Have you you every
heard talk radio in Texas? Naturally the White House is laughing and saying
there is no enemies list. Naturally Cornyn doesn't believe that and probably
you
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Dana wrote:
>
> you think *I* am whining? send something in and see what happens, is what I
> say. I submit that this will be nothing. I have nothing to say because this
> entire little hissy fir of yours is about exactly that, nothing.
>
>
so I take it that mean
but all that is somehow ok...
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 8:31 AM, Larry L wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > I also noticed you didn't respond to my comments about postal workers or
> > meter readers spying on citizens, as was part of the bush
> administr
you think *I* am whining? send something in and see what happens, is what I
say. I submit that this will be nothing. I have nothing to say because this
entire little hissy fir of yours is about exactly that, nothing.
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 8:31 AM, Larry L wrote:
>
>
> I also noticed you didn't respond to my comments about postal workers or
> meter readers spying on citizens, as was part of the bush administration's
> patriot act. If anything that was inspired by Cuba and the Soviet Union. So
> are you going
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 7:41 AM, Dana wrote:
>
> Robert
>
> You've gone off the deep end. They just don't want to have to troll AOL
> chat
> boards to see what the looney-tune right has dreamed up now. They are *so*
> not concerned with the opinions of individual citizens; They want early
> warni
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Larry Lyons wrote:
> Thus let those idiots stuff themselves, or drink themselves, or smoke
> themselves to death, but do it in such a way that it doesn't cost anyone
> else or to society as a whole. Perhaps by having them sign waivers forgoing
> any health insur
>>
>> The last few constitutional crises were not the result of the Democrats.
>> Remember its 30 years ago that Nixon resigned over his attempts to overthrow
>> the constitution. The last time a democratic president was impeached it was
>> over getting a bj. So lets see, one tried to f*ck the con
it depends what the republican president does with the emails!
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> Let me ask you this - If this same exact request was being made by a
> republican president, would you be as tolerant? For some reason, I
> doubt you would.
>
> On Mon, Aug 10,
No, can't say I like the idea or would have asked it if it were me. But this
is a very big red herring imho/.
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> > Dana wrote:
> >
> > you guys are reaching.
>
> Of course they're reaching. "Forward emails" doesn't mean "our
> Lubyanka West tr
>> We need a system that incents people to stay healthy in the first
>> place by punishing unhealthy lifestyles and rewarding healthy ones.
>
>
>Wouldn't matter. People are already punished significantly for unhealthy
>life choicesand it doesn't motivate them to change their ways.
Except what
Let me ask you this - If this same exact request was being made by a
republican president, would you be as tolerant? For some reason, I
doubt you would.
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Dana wrote:
>
> you guys are reaching. Come on. There is are enough real problems to get
> upset about, and ze
> Dana wrote:
>
> you guys are reaching.
Of course they're reaching. "Forward emails" doesn't mean "our
Lubyanka West troopers will silence dissenters".
But it doesn't invalidate the point that the Whitehouse asking for
citizens to forward other citizen's "mail" is not ideal.
~
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 9:27 AM, Gruss Gott wrote:
> We need a system that incents people to stay healthy in the first
> place by punishing unhealthy lifestyles and rewarding healthy ones.
Wouldn't matter. People are already punished significantly for unhealthy
life choicesand it doesn't m
you guys are reaching. Come on. There is are enough real problems to get
upset about, and zero evidence that the white even considered an enemies
list. I'd make a remark about that being a republican thought pattern, but
I'm trying to keep a straight face here ;)
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 6:42 AM,
Robert
You've gone off the deep end. They just don't want to have to troll AOL chat
boards to see what the looney-tune right has dreamed up now. They are *so*
not concerned with the opinions of individual citizens; They want early
warning on the funded campaigns. I could report you for expressing
Michael Dinowitz wrote:
> ... people who drink more than one liter (about four cups) of sweetened
> beverages a day ...
>
And my thought was *more* then one liter|quart a day, WOW, that is
probably the weekly consumption rate for me and my kids.
~~~
> Dino wrote:
>
> My first reaction was that I was right. I avoid sugary drinks,
> especially those with high fructose corn syrup. I feel that they go
> straight to fat.
Well it does reveal one of the reasons why the US has skyrocketing
health care costs: our system doesn't care for health, it tr
> I'm not even sure what it was that the Whitehouse said, but here's the
> way I would see it:
>
> (A.) "Let us know the lies, half-truths, and other BS you're hearing
> about healthcare" Okay.
>
> (B.) "Let us know who the people are that are spreading lies,
> half-truths, and other BS you're he
"My third reaction was, this guy is going to be assassinated by Coke."
If you ever go to "The World of Coke" in Atlanta, you may find this
statement truer than you know...
--
Scott Stewart
ColdFusion Developer
4405 Oakshyre Way
Raleigh, NC 27616
(h) 919.874.6229 (c) 703.220.2835
-Original Me
I only remember Marvel since that's what I grew up with and stopped
following it around issue 199. 200 Issues of Cobra and GI Joe.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:mdino...@houseoffusion.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 09, 2009 11:49 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: GI Joe
44 matches
Mail list logo
