Re: climate raw data destroyed

On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Sam wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Gruss Gott wrote: > > > > Dude, I have no idea what you're talking about. > > I know, but I have patience. > > > You can get temperatures for 100s of years from 100s of sources and > > "global warming" wasn't even

Re: My new project for next year

> > So.. looks like I will be taking the plunge into finding a Blade > Server/Virtualization/SAN solution beginning next year. > > I thought virtualization in your industry was going in a totally different direction. ~| Want to

Re: My new project for next year

booobies!! On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Jacob wrote: > > So.. looks like I will be taking the plunge into finding a Blade > Server/Virtualization/SAN solution beginning next year. > > How fun! =) > > > ~| Want to r

Re: climate raw data destroyed

On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Gruss Gott wrote: > > Dude, I have no idea what you're talking about. I know, but I have patience. > You can get temperatures for 100s of years from 100s of sources and > "global warming" wasn't even a discussion until at least the 70s. > > So it sounds like your

My new project for next year

So.. looks like I will be taking the plunge into finding a Blade Server/Virtualization/SAN solution beginning next year. How fun! =) ~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the Hous

Re: climate raw data destroyed

> Sam wrote: > > Point is moot since the EPA did a run-around congress and is going to > classify exhaling as toxic waste. Talk about CHANGE baby. > Dude, I have no idea what you're talking about. You can get temperatures for 100s of years from 100s of sources and "global warming" wasn't even a

Re: climate raw data destroyed

http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/wigley_denies_i_did_not_choke_on_the_deceit/ On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Gruss Gott wrote: > >> Sam wrote: >> >> This guys thinks they are: >> > > This isn't a game of Where's-the-moron, but you do a good job at th

RE: climate raw data destroyed

>From the same NYTimes article " Globally, one-fifth of the world's carbon emissions come from the destruction of rain forests, scientists say. It is unknown how much of that is being canceled out by forest that is in the process of regrowth. It is a crucial but scientifically controversial quest

Re: climate raw data destroyed

Point is moot since the EPA did a run-around congress and is going to classify exhaling as toxic waste. Talk about CHANGE baby. On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Gruss Gott wrote: > >> Mo wrote: >> I am so tired of the spin and mis-information, on all these topics, >> from all sides. >> > > Here

Re: climate raw data destroyed

Ah, so anyone that doubts hide-the-decline was a totally legitimate scientific procedure is a moron? Let me put this in a way that even you could understand :) If the people we trust taking the temperature are caught lying about the temperatures it's time to ask serious questions. It is not time

Re: climate raw data destroyed

On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Judah McAuley wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Scott Stewart > wrote: > > Note: there are no known non plant species that breathe C02 and produce > > oxygen as a by-product. > > Except: Your Mom > Checkmate! -- You can get killed just for living in

Re: climate raw data destroyed

On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Scott Stewart wrote: > > NatGeo made some good points the other night... > > Is the planet warming: yes Based on the raw data or the fudged data? > Is it generally cyclical: yes > Is the planet warming faster than in previous cycles, their data says yes > Their

Re: climate raw data destroyed

On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Scott Stewart wrote: > Note: there are no known non plant species that breathe C02 and produce > oxygen as a by-product. Except: Your Mom ~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something

Re: climate raw data destroyed

> Sam wrote: > > This guys thinks they are: > This isn't a game of Where's-the-moron, but you do a good job at that. ~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion maili

Re: climate raw data destroyed

> Mo wrote: > I am so tired of the spin and mis-information, on all these topics, > from all sides. > Here's what I don't get: We've got pretty solid temperature data for the last 200 years. Over 2 centuries worth and across 3 centuries. If you look at it there's no doubt we're in a decade-ove

RE: climate raw data destroyed

NatGeo made some good points the other night... Is the planet warming: yes Is it generally cyclical: yes Is the planet warming faster than in previous cycles, their data says yes Their question is "Is man contributing to the accelerated cycle" they believe that we are.. Before Sam pitches the C

Re: climate raw data destroyed

This guys thinks they are: The Smoking Gun At Darwin Zero http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/08/the-smoking-gun-at-darwin-zero/ On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 12:14 AM, Gruss Gott wrote: > So you think temperature readings - recorded history from a zillion > sources - since 1880 are suspect? > ~~

Re: climate raw data destroyed

Nope that's just infrastructure costs. Nothing about new taxes or closed businesses and lost jobs, new light bulbs, new AC's and heaters, appliances... I agree that $10 trillion is nothing, we can just ask Barry to write another check, my grand-kids will be good for it. On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 11

Re: climate raw data destroyed

Vague is right. Worldwide spending over the "next few decades" for all climate related items? But of course worded in your message as if the US was going to spend trillions in the next 15 minutes. I am so tired of the spin and mis-information, on all these topics, from all sides. On Tue, Dec 8

Re: climate raw data destroyed

> RoMunn wrote: > We could do everything wrong and 100 years from now the planet could be an > iceberg, or we could do everything right and 100 years from now the planet > could be a hot-house. Or it could be the other way around. We have no way of > knowing, and more importantly no way of control

Re: grumble craigslist

another good idea, thanks ;) On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 8:11 AM, Cameron Childress wrote: > > Once you get the Craig's search just right, you can also save searches > as an RSS feed using the link at the bottom of the page. Drop it > right into your RSS reader and you can read search results right

SR Sidarth (so-called 'Macaca' of Sen Allen R-VA fame) on Jeopardy on Monday

http://hamptonroads.com/2009/12/jeopardy-contestant-had-earlier-fame-macaca-moment 'Jeopardy' contestant had earlier fame for 'macaca' moment Was that? Yes, it was S.R. Sidarth on television Monday night on Jeopa

Re: Big wave surfing in Hawaii

On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:06 PM, Judah McAuley wrote: > > 50 foot waves in Hawaii have brought around a competition that hasn't > happened for 5 years due to lack of waves. These guys are nuts, but > totally cool. > > http://www.grindtv.com/video/surf/big_waves_hit_hawaii > > And looking like a

Re: grumble craigslist

Once you get the Craig's search just right, you can also save searches as an RSS feed using the link at the bottom of the page. Drop it right into your RSS reader and you can read search results right in your RSS reader. I find this particularly good for breaking down a search by geographical ar

Re: Big wave surfing in Hawaii

btw, great seein' you and the little lady! hope you had a fun trip. ras On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Ras Tafari wrote: > nice rob-o! > > > On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 12:48 AM, Robert Munn wrote: > >> >> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Judah Mc wrote: >> >> > >> > 50 foot waves in Hawaii have b

Re: Big wave surfing in Hawaii

nice rob-o! On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 12:48 AM, Robert Munn wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Judah Mc wrote: > > > > > 50 foot waves in Hawaii have brought around a competition that hasn't > > happened for 5 years due to lack of waves. These guys are nuts, but > > totally cool. > > > > h

Re: For You New Moms

Quaid! ~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:309269 Subscription:

Re: For You New Moms

nice ~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:309268 Subscription: h

Re: Fox and global warming data

sorry, forgot to wrap that in On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Maureen wrote: > > Perhaps verbally..but not mathematically. I just found it ironic that > a story about fudging data would fudge data. > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Michael Grant wrote: > > > > Well, it's been possible to

Re: all your timeline are belong to us

rofl, following this on tweetdeck, samples below: = I just had an acid trip nightmare in Japanese anime!!> == Why the fuck are random Japanese people showing up in my timeline === I have weird japanese people tweeting on my page and im not even following them... i really dont