On Dec 10, 2009, at 9:56 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 9:20 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox
> wrote:
>>
>> I haven't been eitherjust so happened that I got to reading my latest
>> "Skeptical Inquirer" and found an article about how the public and science
>> agree/disagree with each ot
well you claim we don't know... just trying to give you the benefit of the
doubt. In reality, nobody with a serious bone in their body thinks there's
much doubt in my opinion
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> So proud of such an ad
good idea. Go do that. Come back and tell us which is bigger.
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Let's follow the grant money while we're at it.
>
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 10:12 PM, Larry C. Lyons
> wrote:
> >
> > simple suggestion, follow who is donating most of the money. The
>
::shrug:: somewhat valid, but beside the point.
Air travel exists whether you hold this conference or not. I have not seen
(and am not asking for) numbers on emissions from coal-powered plants vs
airplanes but... what are the people from the Pacific Rim supposed to do,
swim? How many people are t
Let's follow the grant money while we're at it.
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 10:12 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> simple suggestion, follow who is donating most of the money. The
> energy companies and those companies that are responsible for a lot of
> the carbon and other pollution are funnelling a
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 9:20 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox
wrote:
>
> I haven't been eitherjust so happened that I got to reading my latest
> "Skeptical Inquirer" and found an article about how the public and science
> agree/disagree with each other on certain subjects.
>
> Regarding climate change
How are all the jets and limo's that are being used for the climate issue in
Copenhagen affecting the current situation? Kind of ironic in this day of
teleconferencing that they have to waste the energy and pollute the air to
talk about what needs to be done about the climate and how to stop pollu
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Dana wrote:
So proud of such an admittedly clueless opinion, I guess you need to
be proud of something.
> I still have the same position on global warming I did a couple of years
> ago. ...
> I am sure Sam will now post a series of links which may or may not be
hurray hurray. Yes, I am easily amused, but this does wonders for the
legibility of collaborative documents.
~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
simple suggestion, follow who is donating most of the money. The
energy companies and those companies that are responsible for a lot of
the carbon and other pollution are funnelling a lot of money to the
so-called climate change deniers. Far more than what is being given to
those legitimately inve
the conspiracy theorist that sits on my should whispers "corporate ownership
of the media." But hey, he thought WMD were a lotta hype too, so
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox <
zaph0d.b33bl3b...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I haven't been eitherjust so happened that I got to r
I haven't been eitherjust so happened that I got to reading my latest
"Skeptical Inquirer" and found an article about how the public and science
agree/disagree with each other on certain subjects.
Regarding climate change:
Warming is due to human activity - Public 49% Scientists - 84%
Warmi
mmm. I have not really been following this because honestly, this smells
like fake controversy to me. There is other science that says there is
climate change, yes? There are Tuvalu and Fiji that say they are worried
about even surviving. There are Alaskan tribes that say their lifestyle is
disapp
Preview here...
http://www.apple.com/trailers/disney/tronlegacy/
-Cameron
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Ian Skinner wrote:
>
> Coming to a theater near you, a year from now. In 3D!
>
> I don't know whether to be intrigued or to run screaming into the hills
> to hide? Maybe bot
~~
The original still makes me want to puke a little in my mouth.
~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups
Coming to a theater near you, a year from now. In 3D!
I don't know whether to be intrigued or to run screaming into the hills
to hide? Maybe both.
http://news.cnet.com/2300-11386_3-10002008-1.htm
On Dec. 17, 2010, Disney will release Tron: Legacy, the long,
long-awaited sequel to the cult hi
http://news.cnet.com/2300-1023_3-10002005.html
There was a lot of brilliant, groundbreaking innovation to emerge on the
Web in the '00s. There was also a lot that, well, wasn't. And to give
those digital train wrecks their proper place in the sun, we present to
you the 10 most annoying things
I pass this on every year as Christmas time approachesand now is that
time :)
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091210/ap_on_re_us/us_secret_santa
Always warms the heart.
--
You can get killed just for living in
Your American skin
great work. too much to read for me... but great work.
ill read it later, when i can, errr, uhhh, stay focused ;)
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Ray Champagne wrote:
>
> This guy's comics really crack me up. The drawings themselves are great
> too. Nice and simple, but lively.
>
> http://th
This guy's comics really crack me up. The drawings themselves are great
too. Nice and simple, but lively.
http://theoatmeal.com/comics/customer_service
~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let t
http://www.bobonline.net/progxiansd/ssj/index.html
--
Larry C. Lyons
web: http://www.lyonsmorris.com/lyons
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/larryclyons
--
The real problem is not whether machines think but whether men do.
- B. F. Skinner -
~~
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:05 AM, Vivec wrote:
>
> "Clearly, the leaked emails have caused disquiet in some quarters.
> There's no doubt there are concerns about the content of some of the
> emails even when you know the way science really works as laid out
> above. The Intergovernmental Pane
discussion?
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 6:46 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> So, you want to ignore everything we've discussed to date and start over?
>
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 6:05 AM, Vivec wrote:
> >
> >
> http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn18238-why-theres-no-sign-of-a-climate-conspiracy-in-hacked-e
So, you want to ignore everything we've discussed to date and start over?
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 6:05 AM, Vivec wrote:
>
> http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn18238-why-theres-no-sign-of-a-climate-conspiracy-in-hacked-emails.html
>
> We can be 100% sure that the world is getting warmer.
> We
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn18238-why-theres-no-sign-of-a-climate-conspiracy-in-hacked-emails.html
We can be 100% sure that the world is getting warmer.
We are certain that greenhouse gasses are the main cause of the world's warming
"Clearly, the leaked emails have caused disquiet in s
25 matches
Mail list logo
